For archives: this is now fixed and tested working by Gregoire:

http://www.mail-archive.com/pmacct-commits@pmacct.net/msg01035.html

Cheers,
Paolo

On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 05:52:59PM +0000, Paolo Lucente wrote:
> Hi Gregoire,
> 
> Thanks for reporting this. It smells like a bug. Can you please produce
> and send me privately a trace with some NetFlow packets containing NAT64
> entries so to be able to reproduce/fix in lab? 
> 
> Cheers,
> Paolo
> 
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 05:41:12PM +0100, Grégoire Leroy wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > I'm using an ASR1001 Cisco for CGN (NAT444 and NAT64). The ASR1001
> > sends logs with netflow and I can read it with the method described
> > here (http://wiki.pmacct.net/OfficialExamples), section 17. To read
> > them, I use pmacct 1.5.0RC2 (in fact, nfacctd).
> > 
> > For NAT444, everything is good, I got records as  :
> > 100.96.0.10                                    58776     [PUB_IP_1]
> > 18782              2 2014-03-21 17:14:53.651000000  0
> > 0
> > 
> > However, here is what I get with NAT64 :
> > 0.0.0.0                                        51056     [PUB_IP_2]
> > 1029               2 2014-03-21 17:14:53.574000000  0
> > 0
> > 
> > I should get an IPv6 address instead of "0.0.0.0".
> > Note : I've built pmacct with --enable-ipv6
> > 
> > Do you have any hints about it ? Did I miss something ?
> > 
> > Thank you very much,
> > Regards,
> > Grégoire Leroy
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > pmacct-discussion mailing list
> > http://www.pmacct.net/#mailinglists
> 
> _______________________________________________
> pmacct-discussion mailing list
> http://www.pmacct.net/#mailinglists

_______________________________________________
pmacct-discussion mailing list
http://www.pmacct.net/#mailinglists

Reply via email to