Hi Paolo, 

  I would say sflow->netflow translation would be valuable according to my 
field experience. 

Reason: the nature of sflow is sampling the packet and forward the info to 
backend (i.e. sflow collector) ASAP.  This causes at least ten times of SQL 
rows and thus, more than ten times of data processing complexity. 

TC
-----Original Message-----
From: pmacct-discussion [mailto:pmacct-discussion-boun...@pmacct.net] On Behalf 
Of Paolo Lucente
Sent: Thursday, November 27, 2014 8:17 PM
To: pmacct-discussion@pmacct.net
Subject: Re: [pmacct-discussion] IPFIX -> NetFlow v9 convert

Hi Eugene,

Translation of protocols and protocol versions is not supported by pmacct. 
Every now and then somebody asks for it but there has never been enough push to 
look into it (specifically handle all the corner cases in order to do something 
proper).

Cheers,
Paolo

On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 10:41:34AM +0400, Eugene Prokopiev wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I need to receive IPFIX datagrams from 1.1.1.1 to 2.2.2.2 and 
> translate them to 3.3.3.3 as NetFlow v9? How to do it with pmacct?
> 
> I tried to see tee plugin description and tee_receivers.lst.example, 
> but I can't find any solution.
> 
> --
> WBR,
> Eugene Prokopiev
> 
> _______________________________________________
> pmacct-discussion mailing list
> http://www.pmacct.net/#mailinglists

_______________________________________________
pmacct-discussion mailing list
http://www.pmacct.net/#mailinglists


====================================================================
本信件可能包含工研院機密資訊,非指定之收件者,請勿使用或揭露本信件內容,並請銷毀此信件。 
This email may contain confidential information. Please do not use or disclose 
it in any way and delete it if you are not the intended recipient.
_______________________________________________
pmacct-discussion mailing list
http://www.pmacct.net/#mailinglists

Reply via email to