antmanno
Tue, 17 Nov 2009 07:33:09 -0800
Shockingly, I got the magazine on Monday when I expected it this Friday. --- In pml1@yahoogroups.com, "bettestreep2008" <bettestreep2...@...> wrote: > > My digital copy arrived today and here are my first thoughts > > The Joanna Krupa cover and pictorial - sensational! Agree > > The Chelsea Handler cover is pointless. I could accept this cover if she was > the interview subject but having dual covers for December wasn't required. > They could have done this for the June 2009 PMOY issue instead. A wasted > opportunity. > > Lolita - 6 pages of some model but it looks rather uninspired. Maybe the text > will provide more meaning. > That model is porn star and star of recent mainstream film, Sasha Grey. My guess is that they were trying to portray a Lolita somehow. While it is a decent pictorial, it hardly supports that idea. > Cheeky erotica - 6 pages and rather interesting. The double page picture > featuring all the models is sexy. Agree > > Sex in Cinema - 6 pages of rather unsexy pics. Time to just give this > pictorial the flick. > > How to undress for a man - 1 page of tiny pictures that are about as sexy as > paint drying! This would have worked much better as a 4 page pictorial with > bigger pictures. > I wish it was more pages, but it was a decent theme. > Crystal Harris - goodness what a huge improvement to every other picture I've > seen of her - including the now deleted Cyber Club ones! She is very pretty in these photos. > > Overall - the December issue is an improvement on previous months but there > is still some way to go. > If you look on the last page it says that there will be double the heat on Playmates (or something like that) => It will be a double issue. There were SIX pictorials in this issue. That is an awful lot even if some of them were rather small like the How to undress for a man and the Lolita pictorials. But, it is something. When did a PB magazine have six pictorials in it that was not a special or double issue?