Nigel Parkin
Thu, 19 Nov 2009 13:36:26 -0800
Possibly because one might assume a fan friendly Playmate in control of her own pricing might do a deal? Possibly because when Tom told the story, or Eric observed it, Eric missed out Tom wondering about a deal?
At the shows I tend to do now, the organiser agrees a price with the guest, and
advertises it beforehand, usually. But then, it's normally photos the organiser
provides, and then you can, if you so wish, take a free still, if the guest
signs your item. ie, you get a poster or mag signed, you pay for the autograph,
and get the still free.
Folks like Tom and Wil will tend do do everything for a guest in one tranche.
Whereas my recent signing featuring Ursula Andress, I got a variety of items..
stills, posters, books, signed by her (and, and I tried to get a trading card,
but it didn't work out) over the weekend, but knew it was a fixed price per
sig, so no deals available..
Btw, 1 year since I started chemo this coming monday... Had another checkup
today.. still going great :)
Nig
----- Original Message -----
From: lemonchet77
To: pml1@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, November 16, 2009 7:03 PM
Subject: [PML1] Re: GC 48 Comments
Wasn't Sondra at the last Chicago GC? I didn't remember hearing any commments
about her not taking pics with fans in Chicago.
Somebody mentioned fans should name the PM who didn't show up. I agree but I
don't notice who doesn't show up unless I want their autograph and they do not
show up or pull a Terri Lynn Doss, arrive at 4pm for a 11am start.
After being subjected to a stream of stupid comments about GC in Memphis or
New Orleans, I wasn't expecting to see the comments by Eric about Sondra and
Karen. Very rude and nasty. How does Peggy allow this to happen?
Also what business is it of anybody on the PML to mentioned a transaction at
GC for autographs, that another collector and PM worked out? If the other
collector is too stupid to ask for a discount, is Karen suppose to say No to
the full price? This isn't something at the person Eric mentioned. It is just a
general statement.
--- In pml1@yahoogroups.com, "JT" <jmg_...@...> wrote:
>
> May be the reason of behaviour of Karen, Sondra and Stacy is that (seen on
GC 48 web site) :
>
> STACY ARTHUR 01/91
> Brought to you by O'Neill's Autographs
> SONDRA THEODORE 07/77
> Brought to you by O'Neill's Autographs
> KAREN VELEZ PMOY 1985
> Brought to you by O'Neill's Autographs
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]