* "David E. Wheeler" <da...@justatheory.com> [2015-01-08T13:42:10] > I think that is probably sane, but maybe there are other opinions? Should we > allow whitespace in L<> URLs? If so, I think we would just change \S to .
I didn't scrutinize the regexp (which is present in perlpodspec) closely, but URLs may not contain unescape spaces, so I think there's no reason to allow it. L<foo bar|http://baz-bar> should be okay L<foo bar|http://baz bar> should not L<foo bar | http://baz-bar> unclear from quick skim of spec I assume the second case is what came up. It's not a valid URI, by my reading of https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3986#appendix-A -- rjbs
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature