Justin Piszcz
Sun, 23 Dec 2007 03:54:30 -0800
On Sun, 23 Dec 2007, Steve wrote:
-------- Original-Nachricht --------Datum: Sun, 23 Dec 2007 06:23:34 -0500 (EST) Von: Justin Piszcz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> An: policyd-weight-list@ek-muc.de Betreff: policyd-weight feature requestHi, Was wondering if support for whitelists would be made available in policyd-weight? For example, see: http://www.dnswl.org/ I add it in here: 'list.dnswl.org', 0.00, -5.0, 'DNSWL', But it still counts as a 'bad' RBL,I had that issue some time ago. I wrote to Robert asking to only count as bad dnsbl if the rating added is positive. If a negative rating is added, then the bad dnsbl is not counted. I think that this is now the default way of calculating inside policyd-weight. What version are you using?
0.1.14 beta-12 currently.
is there any chance of making a whitelist section where if X number of whitelist RBLs include a certain IP -or- the value is less than X it is allowed? This then leads to a second question, perhaps one wants to place emphasis or weight upon the trust level: Per: http://www.dnswl.org/tech Trustworthiness / Score (127.0.x.Y): * 0 = none - only avoid outright blocking (eg Hotmail, Yahoo mailservers, -0.1) * 1 = low - reduce chance of false positives (-1.0) * 2 = medium - make sure to avoid false positives but allow override for clear cases (-10.0) * 3 = high - avoid override (-100.0). So it would need to be something like: list.dnswl.org ret=127.0.0.0 -5.0 list.dnswl.org ret=127.0.0.1 -3.0 Just an idea.. But the main request is a @whitelist for RBL's to help reduce false positives. Justin.Steve____________________________________________________________ Policyd-weight Mailinglist - http://www.policyd-weight.org/-- Psssst! Schon vom neuen GMX MultiMessenger gehört? Der kann`s mit allen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/multimessenger?did=10 ____________________________________________________________ Policyd-weight Mailinglist - http://www.policyd-weight.org/