Justin Piszcz
Sun, 23 Dec 2007 03:55:23 -0800
On Sun, 23 Dec 2007, Henrik Krohns wrote:
On Sun, Dec 23, 2007 at 06:23:34AM -0500, Justin Piszcz wrote:Hi, Was wondering if support for whitelists would be made available in policyd-weight?Of course you should just bypass whitelisted hosts with postfix tables so they don't get to policyd-weight at all. It doesn't have any checks that matter for "good" relays, SA should handle those. For those that insist on using policyd-weight, yeah maybe there could be some option to check dnswl (negative rbls) first and stop tests immediately at given level.
Yes but the reason I'd like it in policyd-weight instead of postfix is its not a good idea to explicitly allow/whitelist that many hosts, some of them are still spam, I got a spam yesterday from a host that was listed on that list, that is why I'd rather take the weight of all of the RBL's combined + the whitelist and hash it out.
Justin. ____________________________________________________________ Policyd-weight Mailinglist - http://www.policyd-weight.org/