Henrik K
Fri, 28 Mar 2008 09:49:30 -0700
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 12:34:28PM -0400, Whit Blauvelt wrote: > > No complaints here. If policyd-weight doesn't get a maintainer, guess we'll > be moving to postfwd. But I tried running that overnight instead, and while > it's a very promising framework it seemed not quite as mature yet. I've been running postfwd for several weeks on production already and it's developing forward very quickly. You can do pretty much everything that policyd-weight does and some better (like async DNS). It's missing some checks like MX relations etc, but I don't know if thats really even needed. The developer is very active and knowable, so I think we are in good shape there. ____________________________________________________________ Policyd-weight Mailinglist - http://www.policyd-weight.org/