-------- Original-Nachricht --------
Datum: Sat, 19 May 2007 04:15:47 -0400 (EDT)
Von: Justin Piszcz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: policyd-weight-list@ek-muc.de
Betreff: Re: S25R anti-spam system and some other stuff

> 
> 
> On Fri, 18 May 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> > Hallo list
> >
> > Has any one read this:
> > http://www.gabacho-net.jp/en/anti-spam/anti-spam-system.html
> >
> > It sounds very interesting. Without DNS lookups getting most of the
> dialups.
> >
> > I have changed on one of my test servers the newest policyd-weight
> edition (beta-5) to use that for dynamic host detection:
> >                #
> http://gabacho.reto.jp/en/anti-spam/anti-spam-system.html
> >                $revhost =~
> >         
> /^[^\.]*[0-9][^0-9\.]+[0-9]|^[^\.]*[0-9]{5}|^([^\.]+\.)?[0-9][^\.]*\.[^\.]+\..+\.[a-z]|^[^\.]*[0-9]\.[^\.]*[0-9]-[0-9]|^[^\.]*[0-9]\.[^\.]*[0-9]\.[^\.]+\..+\./i
> >                ||
> >
> >
> > The catch rate is very good.
> >
> > I would as well suggest to add this into policyd-weight to catch even
> more dynamic hosts:
> >                $revhost =~
> >         
> /^(dhcp|dialup|cable|isdn|ppp|adsl|dsl|dial|dynamic|host|pool|port|ippool|static|user|pc|pop|client)[^\.]*[0-9]|^[^0-9]+[0-9]+\.[^\.]+\.adsl/i
> >                ||
> >
> >
> > The above regex catches on my setup by far more dynamic systems then the
> original policyd-weight regex.
> >
> > Maybe adding "^unknown$" and flag them as dynamic would as well not be
> such a bad idea. But I don't know.
> >
> >
> > Has any one else modified his policyd-weight to catch more of the
> dynamic systems?
> >
> >
> > // SteveB
> > -- 
> > Ist Ihr Browser Vista-kompatibel? Jetzt die neuesten
> > Browser-Versionen downloaden: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/browser
> >
> > ____________________________________________________________
> > Policyd-weight Mailinglist - http://www.policyd-weight.org/
> >
> 
> There is a problem with this, some hosts (mailing lists) are legit on 
> dsl/cable addresses and therefore it blocks legitimate e-mail.
> 
Who was talking about blocking? I was only talking about using the regex (or 
parts of it) from S25R for identifying a wider range of dynamic clients without 
using a lookup like DUL.


> ____________________________________________________________
> Policyd-weight Mailinglist - http://www.policyd-weight.org/

-- 
Psssst! Schon vom neuen GMX MultiMessenger gehört?
Der kanns mit allen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/multimessenger

____________________________________________________________
Policyd-weight Mailinglist - http://www.policyd-weight.org/

Reply via email to