fili
Wed, 16 Jan 2008 09:10:08 -0800
Ok, a bug. Fixing appears troublesome (breaks lowest-resource-usage-policy).Not certain whether requests which will be answered with 'rc:' should generally not be cached (this wouldn't break cache-resources).$CACHESIZE=0;
Thanks Rovert, I've got it up and running now using $CACHESIZE=0;Do you think that no-caching might result in higher loads on a mail-heavy server?
I've read the release info of 0.1.14 beta-14, specificly:
results with 'rc:' as action are not cached
Is it useful for my current setup to update? And should I then change $CACHESIZE back to the default value?On a different note, wouldn't it be a good idea to introduce a variable like:
$BLOCK_RETRY_TTL = 30; 30 being the seconds in which retries will be temporarily blocked. If this value is set to 0, then Policyd-weight won't block retries at all. Regards and keep up the good work! Fili ____________________________________________________________ Policyd-weight Mailinglist - http://www.policyd-weight.org/