A sane and sensible take on the issue. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 20:25:43 -0600 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Sean McBride <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: political-research@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [political-research] [Fwd: 11/22- Jones-Fetzer Crisis: A Reply to Jim's Modest Proposal]
Sean, You have good instincts. The devastation to the WTC appears to me to be overwhelmingly greater than thermate could possibly explain. I therefore believe it is important to explore other possibilities. It is false that I endorse the conjecture that it was done by orbiting satellites. What I think is that the full range of alternatives has to be considered, which, given the evidence that Judy and Morgan have amassed, includes that one. Jim Quoting Sean McBride : > Actually, I wondered whether the WTC towers were brought down by > directed-energy weapons or some similar kind of highly classified advanced > technology from the very beginning -- I speculated about that possibility in > cia-drugs within weeks of 9/11. I didn't have a shred of proof then to > support my intuition nor do I now -- just a strong gut instinct based on the > overall look and feel of the events on 9/11, which always struck me as staged > and rigged, a poorly executed magician's trick. > > But I am certainly not going to demonize or quarrel with any 9/11 skeptic > who disagrees with me. In the absence of hard evidence, there is room for > many competing points of view about what really happened on 9/11. And that > is where the no-planers cult has gone off the rails -- it is unable to > tolerate legitimate diversity of opinion about 9/11. > > > Rosalee Grable wrote: > A little background -- Fetzer agrees with Dr, Judy Wood that the > damage > to the World Trade Centers was caused by beam weaponry from orbiting > satellites. > This is not "aliens" or "spacemen" but Reagan Era Star WARs accomplished > with a few extra lies along the way. > The powers that be can't challenge their facts, so they make up stuff > and expect popularity to get them by. > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: [911InsideJobbers] 11/22- Jones-Fetzer Crisis: A Reply to > Jim's Modest Proposal > Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 16:45:43 +0100 > From: Nico Haupt > > ...happy thanksgiving, latest from ScholarsGate: > > f.y.i. > > http://www.bloglines.com/blog/ewing2001?id=2139 > 11/22- Jones-Fetzer Crisis: A Reply to Jim's Modest Proposal > > http://www.911blogger.com/node/4620 > GeorgeWashington aka Floum ignores statement about his Jones connection > > http://www.bloglines.com/blog/ewing2001?id=2140 > 9/11 Scholars Crisis: Fetzer Accepts Invitation to Speak at National Press > Club > > http://www.bloglines.com/blog/ewing2001?id=2138 > Letter from Kevin Barrett on Fetzer and Space Beams > > http://www.bloglines.com/blog/ewing2001?id=2137 > Video: Lifting the Fog Conference > > http://www.bloglines.com/blog/ewing2001?id=2136 > saiGirl: Professor Steven E Jones- "Connecting the Dots" > > http://www.bloglines.com/blog/ewing2001?id=2135 > A short history of "Scholars for 9/11 Truth" > > 911blogger.com/"GeorgeWashington" outed as a front for Professor Steven E. > Jones > http://911closeup.com/nico/911blogger_jones.html > > -- > Der GMX SmartSurfer hilft bis zu 70% Ihrer Onlinekosten zu sparen! > Ideal für Modem und ISDN: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/smartsurfer > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > >
