Follow-up Comment #3, patch #5709 (project pspp):
You're right.
I would have probably written something like:
static void
reverse (int *values, size_t cnt)
{
size_t i = 0;
size_t j = cnt - 1;
while (j > i )
swap (values[i++], values[j--]);
}
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/patch/?5709>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
_______________________________________________
pspp-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pspp-dev
