> On 7 Mar 2017, at 15:53, pg...@q40.de wrote: > > > GWASS did not produce the same code as QMAC from Minerva source, and > required various sourcecode changes, which now no longer allow to > use QMAC. We did not hunt down all the subtle differences yet. I'm > sure this could all be solved by more debugging and discussing the > issues with you, and you would be more than willing to help. But > this process would require a continuos period of time to concentrate > on the topic, which neither Richard nor me found.
I remember spending much time altering the source code of SMSQ/E so that it could be assembled by GWASS. I think the reason for doing this this was that GWASS allows the 68020+ instructions to be used, which QPC2 allows, but QMAC doesn't. Otherwise, I agree that it is silly to go to the trouble of altering the Minerva code just so that you could use GWASS. George _______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List
