Afternoon Urs, I'm in full agreement with Marcel, I have not yet looked at any of your QL/E offerings *in any depth* , not because of any lack of interest, but because I have my system running how I prefer it.
As for feedback, after many years of writing stuff in various QL magazines, and occasionally creating my own Assembly Language occasional eComic,in afraid that getting feedback is pretty much impossible most of the time. If not for George, keeping me correct all those years, I don't think I'd have had any feedback at all! Good luck. Cheers, Norm. On 13 March 2017 08:47:47 GMT+00:00, Marcel Kilgus <ql-us...@mail.kilgus.net> wrote: >Urs Koenig (QL) wrote: >> Marcel wrote: >>> Good job, thanks. It just seems to contain so much software that I >>> can only briefly test a small part of it :-o >> Appreciate. Your feedback is the one and only since it was released >12 days >> ago. Plus my old Swiss friend Markus took up some of my work and >expanded >> it. This is another form of very constructive feedback. > >That is a sad state of affairs, I can imagine that quite some work >goes into these things. And I would have killed for something like >QL/E while QPC was still a commercial venture ;-) I guess the main >problem is that distributions are cool for new people to check out the >system and it's a very good base for starting your own system. But >most people hanging around here, me included, have tuned their boot >files for two decades, so to speak, and are not looking for anything >that is ready-to-run. I still think it's important to have it, though, >and would like to give it a more thorough go, but there are so many >projects currently going on, some even QL related, it's difficult to >find the time. > >Cheers, Marcel > >_______________________________________________ >QL-Users Mailing List -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. _______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List
