Re: [ql-users] problem with the new C68 pieces for WMAN

[James Hunkins]

This weekend I will try rebuilding everything from scratch (with the 
suitable backup since I can't afford the downtime :)  ).  I am thinking 
that the RELOC stuff might have snuck in during one of the interim 
'patches' to the library and might not be needed.

Will post my success after I do the rebuild.

Cheers,
jim
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Jim Hunkins                                     JDH Software Technologies
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
On Mar 18, 2004, at 6:18 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

In a message dated 15/03/04 07:56:22 GMT Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:



 By way of a test, I hid the old libc_a and still it all worked.
 When I ran 'slb -t ram1_lis libc_a', I could find no evidence of
 your missing name.
 Christopher Cave



 I looked for RELOC (in case it was STRT not START or some other 
variant) by using qmon with
        f 'reloc' <address where I had loaded the various versions of 
LIBC_A  I was looking at>

 There were two RELOCs but not remotely like RELOC_START.

 RELOC_START sounds like something a linker needs to do with all C68 
programs, since they all have absolute addresses between modules, not 
PC relative ones.

 George