Just a quick follow-up question: in the example I saw on your webpage (with
three clades, one of which with a higher rate), how would you go about a
sort of "post-hoc" test to determine which clades differ significantly from
one another in their rates?
On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 4:13 PM, Liam J. Revell <liam.rev...@umb.edu> wrote:
> Hi Karla.
> phytools has a function called ratebytree for this. This essentially
> corresponds to the 'censored' model of O'Meara et al. 2006, but we also
> have a submitted manuscript describing it. I can send you that in a second
> For more information about using the function you can search for
> 'ratebytree' on my blog, blog.phytools.org.
> All the best, Liam
> Liam J. Revell, Associate Professor of Biology
> University of Massachusetts Boston
> web: http://faculty.umb.edu/liam.revell/
> email: liam.rev...@umb.edu
> blog: http://blog.phytools.org
> On 7/22/2017 3:10 PM, Karla Shikev wrote:
>> Dear all,
>> I'd like to test whether the rate of evolution of a phenotypic trait (e.g.
>> body size) is significantly different among distantly-related clades (e.g.
>> mammals vs birds). I got tip data and completely resolved and callibrated
>> trees. One possibility would be to estimate rates and their confidence
>> intervals for each clade and to compare them directly, but I'm sure
>> a more elegant way to do this.
>> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>> R-sig-phylo mailing list - Rfirstname.lastname@example.org
>> Searchable archive at http://www.mail-archive.com/r-
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
R-sig-phylo mailing list - Remail@example.com
Searchable archive at http://firstname.lastname@example.org/