On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 11:43 PM, Daniel Prager <daniel.a.pra...@gmail.com>
> I kind of expected that it would be possible to do what I wanted with
> "indy" contracts, but struggled with the heavy use of combinators in the
Two offhand thoughts:
1. To practice with dependent contracts, I made a "full" spec for the
The exercise was fun, I learned a lot, and I think my solution is "as
readable as possible" :) .
2. "Oh Lord, Don't Let Contracts be Misunderstood" implements a little DSL
on top of ->i contracts: http://www.ccs.neu.edu/racket/pubs/icfp16-dnff.pdf
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.