On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 11:43 PM, Daniel Prager <daniel.a.pra...@gmail.com>

> I kind of expected that it would be possible to do what I wanted with
> "indy" contracts, but struggled with the heavy use of combinators in the
> examples.

Two offhand thoughts:

1. To practice with dependent contracts, I made a "full" spec for the
JavaScript left-pad function.

The exercise was fun, I learned a lot, and I think my solution is "as
readable as possible" :) .

2. "Oh Lord, Don't Let Contracts be Misunderstood" implements a little DSL
on top of ->i contracts: http://www.ccs.neu.edu/racket/pubs/icfp16-dnff.pdf

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to