On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 8:23 PM, Dupéron Georges <jahvascriptman...@gmail.com
> wrote:

> In these cases, instead of turning off the contract checks altogether, it
> would be nice to have a way to disable the define/contract and turn it into
> a contract-out, using a single parameter (perhaps a per-file syntax
> parameter?).
> I'm not sure what would be the best syntax and implementation strategy for
> this, though.

With a `define/contract-out` macro?

But I'd rather not have a macro like this in the contract library.
I prefer reading code with all the "provide" statements at the top of the

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to