rda-l  

Re: [RDA-L] Time and effort

Kelleher, Martin
Thu, 02 Sep 2010 02:16:38 -0700

Personally, I think all librarians (all the way to the top!) should 
periodically manage enquiries in some way or other. I think it's the best way 
to get a personal understanding of the user base, and helps to put all aspects 
of information work in perspective.

Martin Kelleher
Electronic Resources/Bibliographic Services Librarian
University of Liverpool

-----Original Message-----
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access 
[mailto:rd...@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca] On Behalf Of Weinheimer Jim
Sent: 02 September 2010 09:50
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Time and effort

Miksa, Shawne wrote:
<snip>
Jim unbelievable wrote: "But it must be accepted that catalogers are *most 
definitely NOT* the people to know what people need from information. That can 
only come from reference librarians and the public, the researchers, scholars, 
and students, themselves."

With all due respect---what planet are you on, Jim? Come back to this one. 
Where do you get this stuff? Let me welcome you to the 21st century where 
catalogers are user-centric, born and bred. We start from the point of the 
user--what are their needs, how do we organize it to help them meet those 
needs; how do the choices we make as organizers affect their ability to find, 
identify, select, obtain, navigate.....and so on. Let's call it functionality, 
shall we?

Only a reference librarian, and not a cataloging librarian, can know what 
people need from information?  Bulldada. If there is an instance of this then 
it occurs when a cataloger gets so wrapped up in the 'brilliance' of their own 
cataloging skills that they can't see the forest for the trees. 

Done. Outta here. Buh-bye.
</snip>

I will state that in order to find out what the different needs are of 
different people, you must actually work with those people. A cataloger, whose 
work is necessarily done away from the public, *cannot do this*, unless he or 
she also works in reference, but then that is the reference-librarian-half of 
the multi-tasking librarian doing the work. (And I will state that it is highly 
difficult to be very good on both duties--one of the reasons why I have 
suggested that perhaps the current AACR2 cataloging standards may already be 
too high)

Before OPACs, a cataloger may have had practically no contact with the users. 
Today, the most a *cataloger* can do is read and analyse log files, those lists 
of searches done, and then try to *logically divine* what people really want 
and if those searches are correctly done or not. Of course, such conclusions 
may be far off the mark. Working with the patrons (i.e. reference) is the only 
reliable way of discovering what they may want.

When you say that 21st century catalogers (a group to which I, apparently, do 
not belong) are user-centric, born and bred, I personally haven't seen it. In 
fact, the cataloging community's declaration that what people want from 
information is to find/identify/select/obtain etc. is the most convincing 
evidence that I can supply. This is *ABSOLUTELY NOT* what people want when 
searching for information.

How in the world can I state that so blatantly? Just by watching people and 
talking with them, something catalogers cannot do unless they also work as 
reference librarians. People prefer Google searching to searching library 
catalogs, I think there can be little dispute on that. And they say that they 
get better results. People *cannot* do the FRBR-type of searching or retrieval 
there, since there isn't even an option of searching by author, title, or 
subject searching, much less WEMI retrieval possibilities. Yet, people like it 
better and say they get better results. There is an obvious contradiction here, 
and makes the cataloging community look very backward, indeed.

Instead of explaining away all of these contradictions or ignoring them, we 
need to understand what is going on and figure out new possibilities that will 
make a genuine difference to our patrons, and thereby to our own work. 

If catalogers insist that they know it all, woe be to everyone! 

James Weinheimer  j.weinhei...@aur.edu
Director of Library and Information Services The American University of Rome 
via Pietro Roselli, 4
00153 Rome, Italy
voice- 011 39 06 58330919 ext. 258
fax-011 39 06 58330992
First Thus: http://catalogingmatters.blogspot.com/