OK! I got it. Thanks to Steven. Joan
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Arakawa, Steven <steven.arak...@yale.edu>wrote: > If the OCLC BF&S considers the $w to be mandatory if a 775 is created, > then I think your only recourse is a note, preferably formatted (in my > opinion). **** > > ** ** > > Steven Arakawa **** > > Catalog Librarian for Training & Documentation**** > > Catalog & Metadata Services, SML, Yale University**** > > P.O. Box 208240 New Haven, CT 06520-8240 > (203)432-8286 steven.arak...@yale.edu**** > > ** ** > > *From:* Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access > [mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] *On Behalf Of *Joan Wang > *Sent:* Wednesday, November 14, 2012 4:55 PM > *To:* RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA > *Subject:* Re: [RDA-L] Reproduction**** > > ** ** > > Come out another question: if OCLC control numbers are not mandatory, how > can we can these fields as linking entry fields? :D > > Joan Wang > Illinois Heartland Library System**** > > On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Joan Wang <jw...@illinoisheartland.org> > wrote:**** > > Hi, Steven > > Thanks. I thought that OCLC control number is mandatory. If it is not, > there would be no problem. **** > > ** ** > > Thanks again, **** > > Joan**** > > ** ** > > On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Arakawa, Steven <steven.arak...@yale.edu> > wrote:**** > > I don’t think you can use 533 since it is intended to apply to the > reproduction. I was wondering if 534 $p should read Reproduction of > (manifestation): <followed by the details of the original in the > appropriate subfields>. The current LCPS uses 775 or 776, but both > examples seem to assume an existing catalog record for the original, but a > linking control number isn’t mandatory as far as I know, so I don’t see why > you couldn’t use those fields and set the indicator to display the > information as a note.**** > > **** > > Steven Arakawa **** > > Catalog Librarian for Training & Documentation**** > > Catalog & Metadata Services, SML, Yale University**** > > P.O. Box 208240 New Haven, CT 06520-8240 > (203)432-8286 steven.arak...@yale.edu**** > > **** > > *From:* Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access > [mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] *On Behalf Of *Joan Wang > *Sent:* Wednesday, November 14, 2012 4:07 PM > *To:* RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA > *Subject:* [RDA-L] Reproduction**** > > **** > > Hi, **** > > **** > > I got an impression from the 2012 OLAC conference. For reproductions, > transcribe information based on the reproduction in your hands such as in > the three new 33x fields, and record data related to its original > manifestation in linking fields such as 776 and 787, and also use > relationship terms such as "reprint of (manifestation)”. Do not use 533/534 > fields anymore. **** > > **** > > I actually went back RDA Toolkit and found the following general > guideline: **** > > **** > > *When describing a facsimile or reproduction, record the data relating to > the facsimile or reproduction in the appropriate element. Record any data > relating to the original manifestation as an element pertaining to a > related work or manifestation, as applicable.***** > > **** > > My understanding is that RDA treats reproduction as a type of > relationship. That is consistent with FRBR. So catalog the reproduction in > your hands and reflect relevant relationships if necessary. If my > understanding is correct, the above impression I got is just one of > solutions. The solution has an assumption that the related manifestation > (its original version) has been cataloged, and therefore we can link a > record for the reproduction to another for the original version.But what is > the solution for those that have not been cataloged? It is possible that > the original manifestations have not been cataloged? Use notes? Can we use > 533/534 fields? Or my impression is completely incorrect? **** > > **** > > Anybody would like to clarify my question and give me some record > examples? I would appreciate it. **** > > **** > > Many thanks, **** > > Joan**** > > -- **** > > Zhonghong (Joan) Wang, Ph.D. > Cataloger -- CMC**** > > Illinois Heartland Library System (Edwardsville Office) > 6725 Goshen Road > Edwardsville, IL 62025 > 618.656.3216x409 > 618.656.9401Fax**** > > **** > > > > > -- **** > > Zhonghong (Joan) Wang, Ph.D. > Cataloger -- CMC**** > > Illinois Heartland Library System (Edwardsville Office) > 6725 Goshen Road > Edwardsville, IL 62025 > 618.656.3216x409 > 618.656.9401Fax**** > > ** ** > > > > > -- **** > > Zhonghong (Joan) Wang, Ph.D. > Cataloger -- CMC**** > > Illinois Heartland Library System (Edwardsville Office) > 6725 Goshen Road > Edwardsville, IL 62025 > 618.656.3216x409 > 618.656.9401Fax**** > > ** ** > -- Zhonghong (Joan) Wang, Ph.D. Cataloger -- CMC Illinois Heartland Library System (Edwardsville Office) 6725 Goshen Road Edwardsville, IL 62025 618.656.3216x409 618.656.9401Fax
