Hi Greg,
> Using conda makes the installation a lot simpler and saves me a fair
amount of time while doing the builds.
Sounds like a good deal.
> Is using the anaconda python distribution a problem for you?
Actually not. I was concerned about its support for other packages, but
it comes with pywin32 built-in so we can create COM services (think
Excel...) and it does indeed make it much easier to install RDKit.
Thanks for the help.
Cheers
-- Jan
On 2017-05-05 04:48, Greg Landrum wrote:
Hi Jan,
I've stopped creating standalone windows binaries now that the conda
packages are available.
Using conda makes the installation a lot simpler and saves me a fair
amount of time while doing the builds.
Is using the anaconda python distribution a problem for you?
On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 5:41 PM, Jan Holst Jensen
<j...@biochemfusion.com <mailto:j...@biochemfusion.com>> wrote:
Hi,
I was trying to find Python Windows binaries for the latest RDKit
release. I could find them for the older 2016_03_1 release on
SourceForge but had no luck finding anything newer on SourceForge
or Github.
According to GitHub they should be there:
https://github.com/rdkit/rdkit/tree/Release_2017_03_1
<https://github.com/rdkit/rdkit/tree/Release_2017_03_1>
Under "Installation":
"Windows binaries are available with each release." - but where :-) ?
Cheers
-- Jan
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Rdkit-discuss mailing list
Rdkit-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rdkit-discuss
