Re: [releases] Blocker nomination process

[Eike Rathke]

Hi Volker,

On Tuesday, 2008-04-29 20:11:46 +0200, Volker Merschmann wrote:

> >  Is that really the case and intended process? It is not enough to
> >  propose an issue on this list to get it honestly considered for the
> >  release status meeting? Well, just added 88411 then, after one week of
> >  silence with one exception.
> >
> Yes, it is.
> In this way we can keep the blocker issue clean from too much text and
> if additional information is necessary it can be asked and given here.

Don't know how my question is related to "keep the blocker issue clean
from too much text" ... anyway, my intention was to gather opinions on
this mailing list and have the release status meeting considering it
_before_ I added the issue to the blocker list, because I wasn't sure if
it would classify as a blocker. Seems that was the wrong approach.

  Eike

-- 
 OOo/SO Calc core developer. Number formatter stricken i18n transpositionizer.
 SunSign   0x87F8D412 : 2F58 5236 DB02 F335 8304  7D6C 65C9 F9B5 87F8 D412
 OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS
 Please don't send personal mail to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] account, which I use 
for
 mailing lists only and don't read from outside Sun. Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Thanks.

pgppLCSp2OSnb.pgp
Description: PGP signature