From: "Brad Pardee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


It sounds to me very much like the Navy has, in essence, said that a person can only be a chaplain if they act as if they don't actually believe anything. That doesn't sound like what 200+ years worth of American fighting men and women were willing to die to defend.

*******

I don't think that 200+ years worth of Americans died in order to have a Navy Chaplain attempt to indoctrinate their fellow soldiers into the particular faith of that Chaplain. Seeking to protect the religious freedom of all soldiers, and not just the priveledged few, hardly seems out of accord with American values.

I am not familiar with the military chaplancy, but I am familiar with hospital chaplains who work to serve the needs of all patients regardless of their faith position--including chaplains working in sectarian hospitals (most often Catholic). They do not find it necessary to impose their beliefs on the patients they serve. Why should the military be different -- particularly when they are being paid by all citizens, not just their faith cohort?

If the issue is simply the religious freedom of the chaplain, then we can revert to the practices within hospitals that allow outside clergy to attend to the special religious demands of their co-religionists?

David
_______________________________________________
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.

Reply via email to