Mary Anne, this amicus brief filed in the 4th Circuit Muslim ban litigation will suggest many good possibilities: http://www.robbinsrussell.com/sites/default/files/appellate_pdf/FILED%20CA4%20AMICUS%20BRIEF%20-%20IRAP%20v%20Trump.pdf
You might consider assigning the brief itself. On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 6:09 PM, Case, Mary Anne <mac...@law.uchicago.edu> wrote: > Students in my Con Law of Religion course want to devote a class to the > Religion Clauses issues in the “Muslim ban” cases. I would welcome > suggestions as to what materials to assign, especially to a group that may > not have other Con Law experience. > > _______________________________________________ > To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu > To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see > http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw > > Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as > private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are > posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or > wrongly) forward the messages to others. > -- Ira C. Lupu F. Elwood & Eleanor Davis Professor of Law, Emeritus George Washington University Law School 2000 H St., NW Washington, DC 20052 301-928-9178 (mobile, preferred) 202-994-7053 (office) Co-author (with Professor Robert Tuttle) of "Secular Government, Religious People" ( Wm. B. Eerdmans Pub. Co., 2014)) My SSRN papers are here: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=181272#reg
_______________________________________________ To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.
