Dave wrote: > [snip] >> > >> > Basically adding pointers for first, next and previous (last is not >> > optimal) in our feeds. >> >> sounds like a nice thing to have, but this is still just a draft right? >> i'm not really inclined to introduce things that haven't been >> finalized and approved. if the spec has been approved as part of the >> atom protocol for example, then it's fine with me. > > +1 but it should be optional and default to off
Why? - James
