Anil Gangolli wrote: > +1 > > Is "first" earliest or latest in conventional ordering?
Correct, latest it is. > > What's the issue with "last" ? For last we'd need a total count first. However, it's not just total # of entries, we need to get the total for that specific request and the current interfaces don't allow us to easily get that count. No matter what it's slower than just putting a pointer to the next page #. -Elias > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 4:45 AM > Subject: Re: A couple of feed related things... > > >> On 2/21/07, Allen Gilliland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Elias Torres wrote: >>> > I would like to implement Mark Nottingham's feed history. >>> > >>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-nottingham-atompub-feed-history-08.txt >>> >>> > >>> > Basically adding pointers for first, next and previous (last is not >>> > optimal) in our feeds. >>> >>> sounds like a nice thing to have, but this is still just a draft right? >>> i'm not really inclined to introduce things that haven't been >>> finalized and approved. if the spec has been approved as part of the >>> atom protocol for example, then it's fine with me. >> >> +1 but it should be optional and default to off >> >> >>> > Also, I would like to implement a feed for search results in Roller. >> >> +1 >> >> - Dave >> > >
