Allen Gilliland wrote: > Looks fine to me, so +1, but one note. we should be clear about the > caching strategy. my expectation is that we would not cache these feeds > just like we don't cache search results pages. that would need to be > accounted for in the FeedServlet.
It makes sense. It makes so much sense that I'm writing up another proposal for complete reverse proxy support (e.g. no page cache at all, optionally). We would like an option that disables page caching in the app server because we discovered a large amount of CPU being consumed by StringBuffer memory management instead of writing directly to the socket stream. > > Also, we provide the option for the built-in search to be disable, and > that would also need to be handled in the FeedServlet so that search > feeds are not returned when search is disabled. Right. Good catch. -Elias > > -- Allen > > > Elias Torres wrote: >> Hi guys (again), >> >> Here's another simple/short proposal that I would like comments on so I >> can get a sense from the community if I can proceed and when. >> >> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ROLLER/Proposal_SearchFeeds >> >> -Elias >
