Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
>> Adding a "rpm54" port would be the most straight-forward way to include it.
>> I'll see what I can do about it, should be a copy of the existing "rpm52"…
>>
>
> I'd be a bit lazy about rpm54 which is quite "active" atm. Meanwhile,
> rpm-5.3.11++ is "production" and "stable" and all that good stuff.
Added both, "rpm53" 5.3.11-20110602 and "rpm54" 5.4.7-20120302.
The .src.rpm format is somewhat troublesome to port, but bundled
rpm2cpio.sh and extracted the tarball in a post-extract {} step.
--anders
______________________________________________________________________
RPM Package Manager http://rpm5.org
User Communication List rpm-users@rpm5.org
