Performance was my whole rationale for trying sqlite3. I do have some power backup, so I will try reducing the fsyncs.
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 12:03 PM, Mark Hatle <mark.ha...@windriver.com> wrote: > > Note, sqlite support was -much- slower then BerkeleyDB. It was only added > to > deal with people who didn't want to have the Sleepcat license conditions. > Performance was definitely not the reason. > > If your device can live w/o the syncs, you can disable them -- mostly in > the RPM > configuration... just keep in mind if someone powers down in the middle of > a > transaction the data base is more likely to be messed up then with the > fsyncs. > > --Mark > > > Jate > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > RPM Package Manager http://rpm5.org > User Communication List rpm-users@rpm5.org >
