Alexander Dahl
Sun, 24 Jan 2010 04:12:28 -0800
Hi, >> So if I don't put any username there, it's like I would have omitted the >> line. This is not quite what I expected. This may be senseless but I > > Actually it's exactly what I would have expected, not specifying a list > is the same as leaving the list empty, which "auth users = " without any > names does. I guess it's a matter of point of view :-)
Yeah, that's what came to my thoughts after sending the first mail. >> would have expected, the rsync daemon would deny everyone to connect >> then, because he would check an empty list against the secrets file. Is >> there a way to accomplish this behaviour, denying access? Or maybe a > > Put a user in there that doesn't exist in the password file? That's what I did now. Thanks for this idea. :-) Greets Alex -- »With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censured, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably.« (Jean-Luc Picard, quoting Judge Aaron Satie) *** GnuPG-FP: 02C8 A590 7FE5 CA5F 3601 D1D5 8FBA 7744 CC87 10D0 ***
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html