grarpamp
Mon, 08 Feb 2010 18:35:11 -0800
>>> cp -al, rsync >> Various source changes would likely change some metadata in the old >> sets. > Yep. See my request for a --no-tweak-hlinked option to avoid such > https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4561
This is interesting. Though it would have more uses than being just another bolt on alternative to the 'link-dest nosrc itemization' issue, it is that in that regard. >> And it doesn't handle those pesky multiple link-dests. > Presumably you would want to itemize with respect to only one of the > link-dest dirs ... cp -al Someone brought up multiple link-dests as a sortof reason not to pursue the generalized, in rsync, itemization solution. I've not had a reason to use multiple link-dests yet, nor can I think of one other than as a possible dire need for bandwidth/space savings. But in the case someone does use them, which is fine, and they want 'link-dest nosrc itemization', rsync will already have all the paths it needs as arguments and can then sit back and do the crunching for said itemization. > https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5644 I've looked at this one even less than the above one... as it's rather diverged from the OP's Q#1 and the warning and proposal for 'link-dest nosrc itemization'... and the expansion of this thread into a related but unrelated catch all is melting my brain :-) Ben: freebsd mfs = ufs on ram, mdmfs(8) -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html