https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12915
--- Comment #1 from Kevin Korb <rs...@sanitarium.net> --- This would not actually be very helpful. Going between a *nix style timestamp and a FAT one has other issues. Especially if your TZ changes or you are in a TZ where the clock changes twice per year. Your modify windows will need to be 2 + (number of hours difference * 3600) which is kind of an unsafe thing to do. FAT just isn't capable of keeping proper timestamps. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
