sage-devel  

Messages by Date

• 2024/04/25 Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) 'Martin R' via sage-devel
• 2024/04/24 Re: [sage-devel] Re: Question: why does /usr/bin/gcc get called during Sage startup? Matthias Koeppe
• 2024/04/24 Re: [sage-devel] Re: Question: why does /usr/bin/gcc get called during Sage startup? Matthias Koeppe
• 2024/04/24 Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Matthias Koeppe
• 2024/04/24 Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Matthias Koeppe
• 2024/04/24 [sage-devel] Re: Question: why does /usr/bin/gcc get called during Sage startup? Marc Culler
• 2024/04/24 Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Nathan Dunfield
• 2024/04/24 Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Dima Pasechnik
• 2024/04/24 Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Nathan Dunfield
• 2024/04/24 Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Marc Culler
• 2024/04/24 Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Oscar Benjamin
• 2024/04/24 Re: [sage-devel] Re: Question: why does /usr/bin/gcc get called during Sage startup? Dima Pasechnik
• 2024/04/24 Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Dima Pasechnik
• 2024/04/24 Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Marc Culler
• 2024/04/24 Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Dima Pasechnik
• 2024/04/24 Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Oscar Benjamin
• 2024/04/24 Re: [sage-devel] Re: Question: why does /usr/bin/gcc get called during Sage startup? Marc Culler
• 2024/04/24 Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Kwankyu Lee
• 2024/04/24 Re: [sage-devel] Re: Question: why does /usr/bin/gcc get called during Sage startup? Dima Pasechnik
• 2024/04/24 Re: [sage-devel] Question: why does /usr/bin/gcc get called during Sage startup? Marc Culler
• 2024/04/24 Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) 'Martin R' via sage-devel
• 2024/04/23 Re: [sage-devel] Question: why does /usr/bin/gcc get called during Sage startup? Marc Culler
• 2024/04/23 [sage-devel] Re: Question: why does /usr/bin/gcc get called during Sage startup? Marc Culler
• 2024/04/23 [sage-devel] Re: Question: why does /usr/bin/gcc get called during Sage startup? 'Gonzalo Tornaría' via sage-devel
• 2024/04/23 Re: [sage-devel] Question: why does /usr/bin/gcc get called during Sage startup? Dima Pasechnik
• 2024/04/23 Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Dima Pasechnik
• 2024/04/23 Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Matthias Koeppe
• 2024/04/23 [sage-devel] Question: why does /usr/bin/gcc get called during Sage startup? Marc Culler
• 2024/04/23 Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Dima Pasechnik
• 2024/04/23 Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Matthias Koeppe
• 2024/04/23 Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Matthias Koeppe
• 2024/04/23 [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Matthias Koeppe
• 2024/04/23 Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Dima Pasechnik
• 2024/04/23 [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Matthias Koeppe
• 2024/04/23 Re: [sage-devel] VOTE: Revert merged PR with unreviewed dependencies seb....@gmail.com
• 2024/04/23 Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) 'Martin R' via sage-devel
• 2024/04/23 Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Matthias Koeppe
• 2024/04/23 [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Marc Culler
• 2024/04/23 Re: [sage-devel] VOTE: Revert merged PR with unreviewed dependencies David Roe
• 2024/04/23 Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Dima Pasechnik
• 2024/04/23 [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Kwankyu Lee
• 2024/04/23 [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) 'tobia...@gmx.de' via sage-devel
• 2024/04/22 [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) 'Martin R' via sage-devel
• 2024/04/22 Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Kwankyu Lee
• 2024/04/21 Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Michael Orlitzky
• 2024/04/21 Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Matthias Koeppe
• 2024/04/21 [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Matthias Koeppe
• 2024/04/21 Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Matthias Koeppe
• 2024/04/21 [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Matthias Koeppe
• 2024/04/21 Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Marc Culler
• 2024/04/21 Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Nathan Dunfield
• 2024/04/21 [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) 'Martin R' via sage-devel
• 2024/04/21 [sage-devel] Re: Governance proposal: Maintainer/code-owner model for .ci, .devcontainer, .github/workflows, tox.ini Matthias Koeppe
• 2024/04/21 Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Matthias Koeppe
• 2024/04/21 Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Matthias Koeppe
• 2024/04/21 Re: [sage-devel] Modularization project: I. The goals Matthias Koeppe
• 2024/04/20 Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Michael Orlitzky
• 2024/04/20 Re: [sage-devel] On backdooring open source projects Michael Orlitzky
• 2024/04/20 Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) kcrisman
• 2024/04/20 Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Dima Pasechnik
• 2024/04/20 Re: [sage-devel] On backdooring open source projects Emmanuel Charpentier
• 2024/04/20 [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Matthias Koeppe
• 2024/04/20 Re: [sage-devel] Re: SingularError in rational_parameterization Dima Pasechnik
• 2024/04/20 Re: [sage-devel] Re: SingularError in rational_parameterization Dima Pasechnik
• 2024/04/20 Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Michael Orlitzky
• 2024/04/20 Re: [sage-devel] Re: SingularError in rational_parameterization 'Peter Mueller' via sage-devel
• 2024/04/20 [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Matthias Koeppe
• 2024/04/20 Re: [sage-devel] Re: SingularError in rational_parameterization Dima Pasechnik
• 2024/04/20 Re: [sage-devel] Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Dima Pasechnik
• 2024/04/20 Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Dima Pasechnik
• 2024/04/20 Re: [sage-devel] Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Michael Orlitzky
• 2024/04/20 Re: [sage-devel] Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Volker Braun
• 2024/04/20 Re: [sage-devel] On backdooring open source projects Matthias Koeppe
• 2024/04/20 Re: [sage-devel] VOTE: Revert merged PR with unreviewed dependencies Volker Braun
• 2024/04/20 [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) 'Martin R' via sage-devel
• 2024/04/19 [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) 'Martin R' via sage-devel
• 2024/04/19 [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Matthias Koeppe
• 2024/04/19 Re: [sage-devel] Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Michael Orlitzky
• 2024/04/19 [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Matthias Koeppe
• 2024/04/19 Re: [sage-devel] Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Matthias Koeppe
• 2024/04/19 [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) 'Martin R' via sage-devel
• 2024/04/19 Re: [sage-devel] On backdooring open source projects Michael Orlitzky
• 2024/04/19 Re: [sage-devel] Re: SingularError in rational_parameterization 'Peter Mueller' via sage-devel
• 2024/04/19 Re: [sage-devel] Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Michael Orlitzky
• 2024/04/19 Re: [sage-devel] Re: SingularError in rational_parameterization dimpase
• 2024/04/19 [sage-devel] Re: SingularError in rational_parameterization 'Peter Mueller' via sage-devel
• 2024/04/19 Re: [sage-devel] VOTE: Revert merged PR with unreviewed dependencies Travis Scrimshaw
• 2024/04/18 Re: [sage-devel] On backdooring open source projects Georgi Guninski
• 2024/04/18 [sage-devel] Re: sagemath-10.4 beta3 Henri Girard
• 2024/04/18 [sage-devel] sagemath-10.4 beta3 Henri Girard
• 2024/04/18 Re: [sage-devel] VOTE: Revert merged PR with unreviewed dependencies G. M.-S.
• 2024/04/18 Re: [sage-devel] Re: VOTE: Revert merged PR with unreviewed dependencies Kwankyu Lee
• 2024/04/18 Re: [sage-devel] Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Dima Pasechnik
• 2024/04/18 [sage-devel] Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Matthias Koeppe
• 2024/04/18 Re: [sage-devel] Re: VOTE: Revert merged PR with unreviewed dependencies Marc Culler
• 2024/04/18 Re: [sage-devel] VOTE: Revert merged PR with unreviewed dependencies julian...@fsfe.org
• 2024/04/18 Re: [sage-devel] VOTE: Revert merged PR with unreviewed dependencies Michael Orlitzky
• 2024/04/18 [sage-devel] Re: VOTE: Revert merged PR with unreviewed dependencies Nils Bruin
• 2024/04/18 Re: [sage-devel] Re: VOTE: Revert merged PR with unreviewed dependencies David Roe
• 2024/04/18 Re: [sage-devel] Re: VOTE: Revert merged PR with unreviewed dependencies Matthias Koeppe
• 2024/04/18 Re: [sage-devel] Re: VOTE: Revert merged PR with unreviewed dependencies David Roe
• 2024/04/18 [sage-devel] Re: VOTE: Revert merged PR with unreviewed dependencies Matthias Koeppe
• 2024/04/18 Re: [sage-devel] VOTE: Revert merged PR with unreviewed dependencies David Joyner
• 2024/04/18 Re: [sage-devel] VOTE: Revert merged PR with unreviewed dependencies Dima Pasechnik
• 2024/04/18 [sage-devel] Re: VOTE: Revert merged PR with unreviewed dependencies 'Martin R' via sage-devel
• 2024/04/18 [sage-devel] VOTE: Revert merged PR with unreviewed dependencies David Roe
• 2024/04/18 Re: [sage-devel] On backdooring open source projects Lorenz Panny
• 2024/04/18 [sage-devel] Re: SingularError in rational_parameterization Antonio Rojas
• 2024/04/17 [sage-devel] Re: SingularError in rational_parameterization Kwankyu Lee
• 2024/04/17 [sage-devel] Re: SingularError in rational_parameterization Nils Bruin
• 2024/04/17 [sage-devel] SingularError in rational_parameterization 'Peter Mueller' via sage-devel
• 2024/04/16 [sage-devel] On backdooring open source projects Georgi Guninski
• 2024/04/16 [sage-devel] Re: Proposal (redo): Make python_build (and its dependency pyproject_hooks) a standard package Marc Culler
• 2024/04/15 Re: [sage-devel] Re: Proposal (redo): Make python_build (and its dependency pyproject_hooks) a standard package kcrisman
• 2024/04/15 [sage-devel] Urgent proposal: stop merging PRs without consensus, work on a way forward Dima Pasechnik
• 2024/04/15 Re: [sage-devel] Re: Proposal (redo): Make python_build (and its dependency pyproject_hooks) a standard package David Roe
• 2024/04/15 Re: [sage-devel] (Re-)building an inclusive SageMath community. II: Recognizing and fighting abuse, bullying, disrespect David Roe
• 2024/04/15 Re: [sage-devel] Re: Proposal (redo): Make python_build (and its dependency pyproject_hooks) a standard package Dima Pasechnik
• 2024/04/15 Re: [sage-devel] Re: Proposal (redo): Make python_build (and its dependency pyproject_hooks) a standard package Dima Pasechnik
• 2024/04/15 Re: [sage-devel] Re: Proposal (redo): Make python_build (and its dependency pyproject_hooks) a standard package John H Palmieri
• 2024/04/15 Re: [sage-devel] Re: Proposal (redo): Make python_build (and its dependency pyproject_hooks) a standard package François Bissey
• 2024/04/15 Re: [sage-devel] Re: Proposal (redo): Make python_build (and its dependency pyproject_hooks) a standard package Dima Pasechnik
• 2024/04/15 Re: [sage-devel] Re: Proposal (redo): Make python_build (and its dependency pyproject_hooks) a standard package Dima Pasechnik
• 2024/04/15 Re: [sage-devel] Re: Proposal (redo): Make python_build (and its dependency pyproject_hooks) a standard package kcrisman
• 2024/04/15 Re: [sage-devel] Re: Proposal (redo): Make python_build (and its dependency pyproject_hooks) a standard package kcrisman
• 2024/04/15 Re: [sage-devel] Urgent: Please vote on these "disputed" PRs julian...@fsfe.org
• 2024/04/15 Re: [sage-devel] Re: Proposal (redo): Make python_build (and its dependency pyproject_hooks) a standard package Dima Pasechnik
• 2024/04/15 Re: [sage-devel] Re: Proposal (redo): Make python_build (and its dependency pyproject_hooks) a standard package Marc Culler
• 2024/04/15 Re: [sage-devel] Re: Proposal (redo): Make python_build (and its dependency pyproject_hooks) a standard package Michael Orlitzky
• 2024/04/15 Re: [sage-devel] Re: Proposal (redo): Make python_build (and its dependency pyproject_hooks) a standard package kcrisman
• 2024/04/14 Re: [sage-devel] Re: Proposal (redo): Make python_build (and its dependency pyproject_hooks) a standard package 'tobia...@gmx.de' via sage-devel
• 2024/04/14 Re: [sage-devel] Re: Proposal (redo): Make python_build (and its dependency pyproject_hooks) a standard package Dima Pasechnik
• 2024/04/14 [sage-devel] Re: Proposal (redo): Make python_build (and its dependency pyproject_hooks) a standard package Matthias Koeppe
• 2024/04/14 [sage-devel] Re: Proposal (redo): Make python_build (and its dependency pyproject_hooks) a standard package Matthias Koeppe
• 2024/04/14 Re: [sage-devel] (Re-)building an inclusive SageMath community. II: Recognizing and fighting abuse, bullying, disrespect Matthias Koeppe
• 2024/04/14 Re: [sage-devel] Re: Application for NumFOCUS affiliation of SageMath Matthias Koeppe
• 2024/04/14 Re: [sage-devel] (Re-)building an inclusive SageMath community. II: Recognizing and fighting abuse, bullying, disrespect G. M.-S.
• 2024/04/14 Re: [sage-devel] (Re-)building an inclusive SageMath community. II: Recognizing and fighting abuse, bullying, disrespect 'Doris Behrendt' via sage-devel
• 2024/04/14 [sage-devel] Re: Question about change_ring 'Martin R' via sage-devel
• 2024/04/13 [sage-devel] Re: sagemath-10.4 beta3 Kwankyu Lee
• 2024/04/13 [sage-devel] Re: cat: logs/install.time: No such file or directory Matthias Koeppe
• 2024/04/13 [sage-devel] cat: logs/install.time: No such file or directory David Ayotte
• 2024/04/13 [sage-devel] sagemath-10.4 beta3 henri girard
• 2024/04/13 [sage-devel] Re: Question about change_ring julian...@fsfe.org
• 2024/04/13 [sage-devel] Question about change_ring 'Martin R' via sage-devel
• 2024/04/12 [sage-devel] (Re-)building an inclusive SageMath community. II: Recognizing and fighting abuse, bullying, disrespect Matthias Koeppe
• 2024/04/12 Re: [sage-devel] Urgent: Please vote on these "disputed" PRs jplab
• 2024/04/12 Re: [sage-devel] Urgent: Please vote on these "disputed" PRs Matthias Koeppe
• 2024/04/12 Re: [sage-devel] SEGV caused by CTL-C in C/C++ code probably related to signals julian...@fsfe.org
• 2024/04/12 Re: [sage-devel] SEGV caused by CTL-C in C/C++ code probably related to signals Georgi Guninski
• 2024/04/12 Re: [sage-devel] SEGV caused by CTL-C in C/C++ code probably related to signals Dima Pasechnik
• 2024/04/12 Re: [sage-devel] SEGV caused by CTL-C in C/C++ code probably related to signals Georgi Guninski
• 2024/04/12 Re: [sage-devel] SEGV caused by CTL-C in C/C++ code probably related to signals Dima Pasechnik
• 2024/04/11 Re: [sage-devel] Re: source code tarball? Dima Pasechnik
• 2024/04/11 Re: [sage-devel] SEGV caused by CTL-C in C/C++ code probably related to signals dimpase
• 2024/04/11 Re: [sage-devel] Governance proposal: Maintainer/code-owner model for .ci, .devcontainer, .github/workflows, tox.ini Matthias Koeppe
• 2024/04/11 Re: [sage-devel] Governance proposal: Maintainer/code-owner model for .ci, .devcontainer, .github/workflows, tox.ini Dima Pasechnik
• 2024/04/11 Re: [sage-devel] Governance proposal: Maintainer/code-owner model for .ci, .devcontainer, .github/workflows, tox.ini Matthias Koeppe
• 2024/04/11 Re: [sage-devel] Governance proposal: Maintainer/code-owner model for .ci, .devcontainer, .github/workflows, tox.ini Dima Pasechnik
• 2024/04/11 Re: [sage-devel] Governance proposal: Maintainer/code-owner model for .ci, .devcontainer, .github/workflows, tox.ini Matthias Koeppe
• 2024/04/11 Re: [sage-devel] SEGV caused by CTL-C in C/C++ code probably related to signals Georgi Guninski
• 2024/04/11 Re: [sage-devel] SEGV caused by CTL-C in C/C++ code probably related to signals dimpase
• 2024/04/11 Re: [sage-devel] Governance proposal: Maintainer/code-owner model for .ci, .devcontainer, .github/workflows, tox.ini dimpase
• 2024/04/10 Re: [sage-devel] SEGV caused by CTL-C in C/C++ code probably related to signals Georgi Guninski
• 2024/04/10 Re: [sage-devel] Urgent: Please vote on these "disputed" PRs David Roe
• 2024/04/10 Re: [sage-devel] Urgent: Please vote on these "disputed" PRs 'tobia...@gmx.de' via sage-devel
• 2024/04/10 Re: [sage-devel] Proposal (redo): Make python_build (and its dependency pyproject_hooks) a standard package Kwankyu Lee
• 2024/04/10 Re: [sage-devel] Urgent: Please vote on these "disputed" PRs Matthias Koeppe
• 2024/04/10 Re: [sage-devel] Governance proposal: Maintainer/code-owner model for .ci, .devcontainer, .github/workflows, tox.ini Matthias Koeppe
• 2024/04/10 Re: [sage-devel] Urgent: Please vote on these "disputed" PRs Dima Pasechnik
• 2024/04/10 Re: [sage-devel] Governance proposal: Maintainer/code-owner model for .ci, .devcontainer, .github/workflows, tox.ini Dima Pasechnik
• 2024/04/10 Re: [sage-devel] Governance proposal: Maintainer/code-owner model for .ci, .devcontainer, .github/workflows, tox.ini Matthias Koeppe
• 2024/04/10 Re: [sage-devel] Governance proposal: Maintainer/code-owner model for .ci, .devcontainer, .github/workflows, tox.ini Dima Pasechnik
• 2024/04/10 Re: [sage-devel] SEGV caused by CTL-C in C/C++ code probably related to signals Nils Bruin
• 2024/04/10 Re: [sage-devel] Urgent: Please vote on these "disputed" PRs Dima Pasechnik
• 2024/04/10 Re: [sage-devel] Governance proposal: Maintainer/code-owner model for .ci, .devcontainer, .github/workflows, tox.ini Matthias Koeppe
• 2024/04/10 Re: [sage-devel] Governance proposal: Maintainer/code-owner model for .ci, .devcontainer, .github/workflows, tox.ini Dima Pasechnik
• 2024/04/10 Re: [sage-devel] Urgent: Please vote on these "disputed" PRs Matthias Koeppe
• 2024/04/10 Re: [sage-devel] Proposal (redo): Make python_build (and its dependency pyproject_hooks) a standard package Dima Pasechnik
• 2024/04/10 Re: [sage-devel] Proposal (redo): Make python_build (and its dependency pyproject_hooks) a standard package Matthias Koeppe
• 2024/04/10 Re: [sage-devel] Proposal (redo): Make python_build (and its dependency pyproject_hooks) a standard package Dima Pasechnik
• 2024/04/10 Re: [sage-devel] SEGV caused by CTL-C in C/C++ code probably related to signals Vincent Delecroix
• 2024/04/10 Re: [sage-devel] Governance proposal: Maintainer/code-owner model for .ci, .devcontainer, .github/workflows, tox.ini Matthias Koeppe
• 2024/04/10 Re: [sage-devel] Governance proposal: Maintainer/code-owner model for .ci, .devcontainer, .github/workflows, tox.ini Matthias Koeppe
• 2024/04/10 Re: [sage-devel] Urgent: Please vote on these "disputed" PRs Matthias Koeppe
• 2024/04/10 Re: [sage-devel] Re: source code tarball? John Cremona
• 2024/04/10 Re: [sage-devel] Urgent: Please vote on these "disputed" PRs kcrisman
• 2024/04/10 [sage-devel] Re: source code tarball? julian...@fsfe.org
• 2024/04/10 [sage-devel] SEGV caused by CTL-C in C/C++ code probably related to signals Georgi Guninski
• 2024/04/10 [sage-devel] Re: Problem with InfinitePolynomialRing julian...@fsfe.org
• 2024/04/10 [sage-devel] Re: Proposal (redo): Make python_build (and its dependency pyproject_hooks) a standard package Nathan Dunfield
• 2024/04/10 Re: [sage-devel] Urgent: Please vote on these "disputed" PRs julian...@fsfe.org
• 2024/04/10 Re: [sage-devel] Governance proposal: Maintainer/code-owner model for .ci, .devcontainer, .github/workflows, tox.ini Dima Pasechnik
• 2024/04/10 Re: [sage-devel] Governance proposal: Maintainer/code-owner model for .ci, .devcontainer, .github/workflows, tox.ini Dima Pasechnik
• 2024/04/10 [sage-devel] source code tarball? John Cremona
• 2024/04/10 [sage-devel] Re: [sagemath/sage] Restructure `sage.*.all` for modularization, replace relative by absolute imports (PR #36676) Dima Pasechnik
• 2024/04/10 Re: [sage-devel] Urgent: Please vote on these "disputed" PRs 'Martin R' via sage-devel
• 2024/04/09 [sage-devel] Proposal (redo): Make python_build (and its dependency pyproject_hooks) a standard package Matthias Koeppe
• 2024/04/09 Re: [sage-devel] Governance proposal: Maintainer/code-owner model for .ci, .devcontainer, .github/workflows, tox.ini Kwankyu Lee
• 2024/04/09 [sage-devel] Re: Github workflows stopped working due to accidental "crazy" commit Kwankyu Lee

• Earlier messages