Messages by Date
-
2006/07/21
[SC-L] Administrivia: Bumper Stickers
Kenneth Van Wyk
-
2006/07/21
Re: [SC-L] bumper sticker slogan for secure software
John Wilander
-
2006/07/21
Re: [SC-L] bumper sticker slogan for secure software
mikeiscool
-
2006/07/21
Re: [SC-L] bumper sticker slogan for secure software
der Mouse
-
2006/07/21
Re: [SC-L] bumper sticker slogan for secure software
der Mouse
-
2006/07/21
Re: [SC-L] "Bumper sticker" definition of secure software
mikeiscool
-
2006/07/21
Re: [SC-L] bumper sticker slogan for secure software
Dana Epp
-
2006/07/20
Re: [SC-L] bumper sticker slogan for secure software
ljknews
-
2006/07/20
Re: [SC-L] bumper sticker slogan for secure software
ljknews
-
2006/07/20
Re: [SC-L] bumper sticker slogan for secure software
Florian Weimer
-
2006/07/20
Re: [SC-L] bumper sticker slogan for secure software
Pascal Meunier
-
2006/07/20
Re: [SC-L] bumper sticker slogan for secure software
Pascal Meunier
-
2006/07/20
Re: [SC-L] bumper sticker slogan for secure software
leichter_jerrold
-
2006/07/20
Re: [SC-L] bumper sticker slogan for secure software
Pascal Meunier
-
2006/07/20
Re: [SC-L] bumper sticker slogan for secure software
Florian Weimer
-
2006/07/20
Re: [SC-L] bumper sticker slogan for secure software
Blue Boar
-
2006/07/20
[SC-L] code review tools for tcl?
j eric townsend
-
2006/07/20
Re: [SC-L] bumper sticker slogan for secure software
Gary McGraw
-
2006/07/20
Re: [SC-L] bumper sticker slogan for secure software
Pascal Meunier
-
2006/07/20
[SC-L] Google Auditing
Gadi Evron
-
2006/07/20
Re: [SC-L] bumper sticker slogan for secure software
Wall, Kevin
-
2006/07/20
Re: [SC-L] "Bumper sticker" definition of secure software
Florian Weimer
-
2006/07/20
Re: [SC-L] bumper sticker slogan for secure software
Florian Weimer
-
2006/07/20
Re: [SC-L] bumper sticker slogan for secure software
Gary McGraw
-
2006/07/20
Re: [SC-L] bumper sticker slogan for secure software
Dana Epp
-
2006/07/20
Re: [SC-L] bumper sticker slogan for secure software
mikeiscool
-
2006/07/19
Re: [SC-L] bumper sticker slogan for secure software
der Mouse
-
2006/07/19
Re: [SC-L] bumper sticker slogan for secure software
Andrew van der Stock
-
2006/07/19
Re: [SC-L] Resource limitation
leichter_jerrold
-
2006/07/19
Re: [SC-L] bumper sticker slogan for secure software
Pascal Meunier
-
2006/07/19
Re: [SC-L] bumper sticker slogan for secure software
mikeiscool
-
2006/07/18
Re: [SC-L] bumper sticker slogan for secure software
<...>
-
2006/07/18
Re: [SC-L] bumper sticker slogan for secure software
Wietse Venema
-
2006/07/18
Re: [SC-L] bumper sticker slogan for secure software
Andrew van der Stock
-
2006/07/18
Re: [SC-L] bumper sticker slogan for secure software
Dana Epp
-
2006/07/18
[SC-L] bumper sticker slogan for secure software
SC-L Subscriber Dave Aronson
-
2006/07/18
Re: [SC-L] "Bumper sticker" definition of secure software
Paolo Perego
-
2006/07/18
Re: [SC-L] Resource limitation
Pete Shanahan
-
2006/07/18
Re: [SC-L] "Bumper sticker" definition of secure software
Gadi Evron
-
2006/07/18
Re: [SC-L] "Bumper sticker" definition of secure software
Rajeev Gopalakrishna
-
2006/07/17
Re: [SC-L] Resource limitation
Nash
-
2006/07/17
Re: [SC-L] "Bumper sticker" definition of secure software
Glenn and Mary Everhart
-
2006/07/17
Re: [SC-L] "Bumper sticker" definition of secure software
Pascal Meunier
-
2006/07/17
[SC-L] Resource limitation
leichter_jerrold
-
2006/07/17
Re: [SC-L] "Bumper sticker" definition of secure software
Peter G. Neumann
-
2006/07/17
Re: [SC-L] "Bumper sticker" definition of secure software
Gadi Evron
-
2006/07/17
Re: [SC-L] "Bumper sticker" definition of secure software
leichter_jerrold
-
2006/07/17
Re: [SC-L] "Bumper sticker" definition of secure software
mark
-
2006/07/17
Re: [SC-L] "Bumper sticker" definition of secure software
Peter G. Neumann
-
2006/07/17
Re: [SC-L] "Bumper sticker" definition of secure software
mikeiscool
-
2006/07/17
Re: [SC-L] (no subject)
SC-L Subscriber Dave Aronson
-
2006/07/17
Re: [SC-L] "Bumper sticker" definition of secure software
Gadi Evron
-
2006/07/17
Re: [SC-L] bumper sticker slogan for secure software
Goertzel Karen
-
2006/07/17
Re: [SC-L] "Bumper sticker" definition of secure software
Goertzel Karen
-
2006/07/17
Re: [SC-L] "Bumper sticker" definition of secure software
Shea, Brian A
-
2006/07/17
Re: [SC-L] "Bumper sticker" definition of secure software
Jeremy Epstein
-
2006/07/17
Re: [SC-L] "Bumper sticker" definition of secure software
Wall, Kevin
-
2006/07/17
Re: [SC-L] (no subject)
SC-L Subscriber Dave Aronson
-
2006/07/17
[SC-L] bumper sticker slogan for secure software
SC-L Subscriber Dave Aronson
-
2006/07/17
[SC-L] silver bullet: mjr
Gary McGraw
-
2006/07/17
Re: [SC-L] "Bumper sticker" definition of secure software
Crispin Cowan
-
2006/07/17
Re: [SC-L] "Bumper sticker" definition of secure software
mikeiscool
-
2006/07/17
Re: [SC-L] "Bumper sticker" definition of secure software
Holger.Peine
-
2006/07/17
Re: [SC-L] "Bumper sticker" definition of secure software
Gary McGraw
-
2006/07/17
Re: [SC-L] "Bumper sticker" definition of secure software
Crispin Cowan
-
2006/07/17
Re: [SC-L] "Bumper sticker" definition of secure software
mikeiscool
-
2006/07/16
Re: [SC-L] "Bumper sticker" definition of secure software
Crispin Cowan
-
2006/07/16
Re: [SC-L] "Bumper sticker" definition of secure software
Julie J.C.H. Ryan
-
2006/07/16
Re: [SC-L] "Bumper sticker" definition of secure software
Gadi Evron
-
2006/07/16
Re: [SC-L] "Bumper sticker" definition of secure software
Gunnar Peterson
-
2006/07/16
Re: [SC-L] "Bumper sticker" definition of secure software
Dave Aronson
-
2006/07/16
Re: [SC-L] "Bumper sticker" definition of secure software
mikeiscool
-
2006/07/16
Re: [SC-L] "Bumper sticker" definition of secure software
Stephen de Vries
-
2006/07/16
Re: [SC-L] "Bumper sticker" definition of secure software
ljknews
-
2006/07/16
[SC-L] "Bumper sticker" definition of secure software
Goertzel Karen
-
2006/07/15
Re: [SC-L] Dr. Dobb's | Quick-Kill Project Management | June 30, 2006
Crispin Cowan
-
2006/07/14
RE: [SC-L] ddj: beyond the badnessometer
Arian J. Evans
-
2006/07/14
Re: [SC-L] ddj: beyond the badnessometer
Gadi Evron
-
2006/07/14
Re: [SC-L] ddj: beyond the badnessometer
Daniele Muscetta
-
2006/07/13
RE: [SC-L] ddj: beyond the badnessometer
Dana Epp
-
2006/07/13
RE: [SC-L] ddj: beyond the badnessometer
Gary McGraw
-
2006/07/13
Re: [SC-L] ddj: beyond the badnessometer
Nash
-
2006/07/13
Re: [SC-L] ddj: beyond the badnessometer
Gadi Evron
-
2006/07/13
[SC-L] ddj: beyond the badnessometer
Gary McGraw
-
2006/07/10
[SC-L] InformationWeek | IT Security | Built-In Software Security Flaws Have Companies Up In Arms | July 10, 2006
Kenneth Van Wyk
-
2006/07/08
[SC-L] darkreading covers software security
Gary McGraw
-
2006/07/07
[SC-L] Darkreading: on developer optimism
Gary McGraw
-
2006/07/07
RE: [SC-L] Dr. Dobb's | Quick-Kill Project Management | June 30, 2006
Wall, Kevin
-
2006/07/07
[SC-L] Dr. Dobb's | Quick-Kill Project Management | June 30, 2006
Kenneth Van Wyk
-
2006/07/07
[SC-L] Dr. Dobb's | Quick-Kill Project Management | June 30, 2006
Kenneth Van Wyk
-
2006/07/07
[SC-L] "Baking Security In" - Microsoft dev security training
Gadi Evron
-
2006/07/06
[SC-L] Sd west
Gary McGraw
-
2006/07/05
[SC-L] SD West Call for proposals
Gary McGraw
-
2006/07/01
[SC-L] OWASP Java Project: Call for volunteers
Stephen de Vries
-
2006/06/27
[SC-L] OWASP PHP Top 5 Announcement
Andrew van der Stock
-
2006/06/22
[SC-L] Article -- IBM offers developers free security tools
Kenneth Van Wyk
-
2006/06/21
Re: [SC-L] Ajax security basics
Gunnar Peterson
-
2006/06/21
[SC-L] Ajax security basics
Kenneth Van Wyk
-
2006/06/14
Re: [SC-L] RE: Comparing Scanning Tools
John Steven
-
2006/06/14
[SC-L] Column -- "New Terrorist Profile: Phone Users"
Kenneth R. van Wyk
-
2006/06/13
Re: [SC-L] Re: Comparing Scanning Tools (false positives)
David A. Wheeler
-
2006/06/13
Re: [SC-L] Re: Comparing Scanning Tools (false positives)
Johan Peeters
-
2006/06/13
Re: [SC-L] Re: Comparing Scanning Tools (false positives)
David A. Wheeler
-
2006/06/13
Re: [SC-L] RE: Comparing Scanning Tools
Michael Mucha
-
2006/06/13
RE: [SC-L] Re: Comparing Scanning Tools (false positives)
Gary McGraw
-
2006/06/13
Re: [SC-L] Re: Comparing Scanning Tools (false positives)
Crispin Cowan
-
2006/06/12
[SC-L] Re: Comparing Scanning Tools (false positives)
David A. Wheeler
-
2006/06/12
[SC-L] managed string library
Robert C. Seacord
-
2006/06/12
[SC-L] Silver Bullet: Dan Geer
Gary McGraw
-
2006/06/09
RE: [SC-L] RE: Comparing Scanning Tools
ljknews
-
2006/06/09
RE: [SC-L] RE: Comparing Scanning Tools
Jeremy Epstein
-
2006/06/09
RE: [SC-L] RE: Comparing Scanning Tools
Dave Wichers
-
2006/06/09
RE: [SC-L] RE: Comparing Scanning Tools
McGovern, James F (HTSC, IT)
-
2006/06/09
Re: [SC-L] RE: Comparing Scanning Tools
Gunnar Peterson
-
2006/06/09
[SC-L] RE: Comparing Scanning Tools
Brian Chess
-
2006/06/09
[SC-L] Re: Comparing Scanning Tools
Brian Chess
-
2006/06/08
Re: [SC-L] Comparing Scanning Tools
Gunnar Peterson
-
2006/06/08
[SC-L] SOA and security
Gary McGraw
-
2006/06/08
RE: [SC-L] Comparing Scanning Tools
McGovern, James F (HTSC, IT)
-
2006/06/08
RE: [SC-L] Comparing Scanning Tools
Gary McGraw
-
2006/06/08
Re: [SC-L] Comparing Scanning Tools
Gunnar Peterson
-
2006/06/07
RE: [SC-L] Comparing Scanning Tools
McGovern, James F (HTSC, IT)
-
2006/06/07
Re: [SC-L] Where are developers who know how to develop secure so ftware?
leichter_jerrold
-
2006/06/07
[SC-L] Samsung "gets it"!
Goertzel Karen
-
2006/06/07
Re: [SC-L] Comparing Scanning Tools
leichter_jerrold
-
2006/06/07
[SC-L] Reusable Security for Segmented Data Domains
Stephen de Vries
-
2006/06/06
Re: [SC-L] Comparing Scanning Tools
Joe Teff
-
2006/06/06
Re: [SC-L] Secure Application Protocol Design
Gunnar Peterson
-
2006/06/06
[SC-L] SD Times
Gary McGraw
-
2006/06/06
Re: [SC-L] Where are developers who know how to develop secure software?
Peter G. Neumann
-
2006/06/06
[SC-L] Secure Application Protocol Design
McGovern, James F (HTSC, IT)
-
2006/06/06
[SC-L] Comparing Scanning Tools
McGovern, James F (HTSC, IT)
-
2006/06/05
Re: [SC-L] Hiring folks that are familar with SC practices
Peter G. Neumann
-
2006/06/05
[SC-L] Where are developers who know how to develop secure software?
David A. Wheeler
-
2006/06/05
Re: [SC-L] Hiring folks that are familar with SC practices
George Capehart
-
2006/06/04
Re: [SC-L] Hiring folks that are familar with SC practices
Gunnar Peterson
-
2006/06/04
Re: [SC-L] Hiring folks that are familar with SC practices
ljknews
-
2006/06/04
[SC-L] Hiring folks that are familar with SC practices
McGovern, James F (HTSC, IT)
-
2006/05/27
Re: [SC-L] Re: [WEB SECURITY] On sandboxes, and why you should care
George Capehart
-
2006/05/27
[SC-L] Re: On sandboxes, and why you should care
Jeff Williams
-
2006/05/27
[SC-L] Re: [WEB SECURITY] On sandboxes, and why you should care
Stephen de Vries
-
2006/05/27
RE: [SC-L] Re: [WEB SECURITY] On sandboxes, and why you should care
Jeff Williams
-
2006/05/25
[SC-L] STL iterator vulnerabilities
Robert C. Seacord
-
2006/05/24
Re: [SC-L] Re: [WEB SECURITY] On sandboxes, and why you should care
Andrew van der Stock
-
2006/05/24
Re: [SC-L] Ajax one panel
Crispin Cowan
-
2006/05/24
Re: [SC-L] Re: [WEB SECURITY] On sandboxes, and why you should ca re
leichter_jerrold
-
2006/05/23
[SC-L] Re: [WEB SECURITY] On sandboxes, and why you should care
Dinis Cruz
-
2006/05/22
Re: [SC-L] Ajax one panel
Johan Peeters
-
2006/05/22
Re: [SC-L] Ajax one panel
Gary McGraw
-
2006/05/22
Re: [SC-L] Ajax one panel
Johan Peeters
-
2006/05/22
Re: [SC-L] Ajax one panel
Johan Peeters
-
2006/05/22
Re: [SC-L] Ajax one panel
Gary McGraw
-
2006/05/22
Re: [SC-L] Ajax one panel
John Steven
-
2006/05/22
Re: [SC-L] Ajax one panel
Johan Peeters
-
2006/05/19
[SC-L] Ajax one panel
Gary McGraw
-
2006/05/16
[SC-L] More irony?
Gary McGraw
-
2006/05/15
[SC-L] New podcast (sneak preview)
Gary McGraw
-
2006/05/15
Re: [SC-L] By default, the Verifier is disabled on .Net and Java
leichter_jerrold
-
2006/05/15
Re: [SC-L] By default, the Verifier is disabled on .Net and Java
Michael Silk
-
2006/05/15
[SC-L] By default, the Verifier is disabled on .Net and Java
j lunerwood
-
2006/05/14
[SC-L] Robert Cringely on Type Safety (well sort of :)
Dinis Cruz
-
2006/05/14
Re: [SC-L] By default, the Verifier is disabled on .Net and Java
Dinis Cruz
-
2006/05/13
Re: [SC-L] By default, the Verifier is disabled on .Net and Java
Gary McGraw
-
2006/05/13
Re: [SC-L] By default, the Verifier is disabled on .Net and Java
Michael Silk
-
2006/05/13
Re: [SC-L] By default, the Verifier is disabled on .Net and Java
Stephen de Vries
-
2006/05/13
Re: [SC-L] By default, the Verifier is disabled on .Net and Java
Stephen de Vries
-
2006/05/12
Re: [SC-L] By default, the Verifier is disabled on .Net and Java
Michael Silk
-
2006/05/12
[SC-L] Comment on Microsoft's leaked memos, and the unofficial end of Microsoft 'Trustworthy Computing'
Dinis Cruz
-
2006/05/12
Re: [SC-L] By default, the Verifier is disabled on .Net and Java
Dinis Cruz
-
2006/05/12
Re: [SC-L] By default, the Verifier is disabled on .Net and Java
Dinis Cruz
-
2006/05/12
Re: [SC-L] By default, the Verifier is disabled on .Net and Java
Dinis Cruz
-
2006/05/12
Re: [SC-L] By default, the Verifier is disabled on .Net and Java
Dinis Cruz
-
2006/05/11
Re: [SC-L] By default, the Verifier is disabled on .Net and Java
David Eisner
-
2006/05/11
Re: [SC-L] By default, the Verifier is disabled on .Net and Java
Michael Silk
-
2006/05/11
RE: [SC-L] By default, the Verifier is disabled on .Net and Java
Jeff Williams
-
2006/05/11
[SC-L] Black Hat class: Advanced Asp.Net Exploits and Countermeasures
Dinis Cruz
-
2006/05/11
Re: [SC-L] By default, the Verifier is disabled on .Net and Java
Stephen de Vries
-
2006/05/10
[SC-L] Why Novell should take on the 'type-safe platform' challenge
Dinis Cruz
-
2006/05/09
[SC-L] Tech target interview
Gary McGraw
-
2006/05/09
RE: [SC-L] By default, the Verifier is disabled on .Net and Java
Gary McGraw
-
2006/05/08
Re: [SC-L] By default, the Verifier is disabled on .Net and Java
Michael Silk
-
2006/05/08
Re: [SC-L] By default, the Verifier is disabled on .Net and Java
Michael Silk
-
2006/05/08
RE: [SC-L] By default, the Verifier is disabled on .Net and Java
Gary McGraw
-
2006/05/08
RE: [SC-L] By default, the Verifier is disabled on .Net and Java
Wall, Kevin
-
2006/05/08
Re: [SC-L] By default, the Verifier is disabled on .Net and Java
Dinis Cruz
-
2006/05/08
Re: [SC-L] By default, the Verifier is disabled on .Net and Java
Dinis Cruz
-
2006/05/08
RE: [SC-L] HNS - Biggest X Window security hole since 2000
Tim Hollebeek
-
2006/05/08
Re: [SC-L] HNS - Biggest X Window security hole since 2000
Florian Weimer
-
2006/05/08
Re: [SC-L] HNS - Biggest X Window security hole since 2000
Robert C. Seacord
-
2006/05/08
Re: [SC-L] HNS - Biggest X Window security hole since 2000
der Mouse
-
2006/05/06
[SC-L] Re: WSJ.com - Tech Companies Check Software
Mark Graff
-
2006/05/05
[SC-L] WSJ.com - Tech Companies Check Software Earlier for Flaws
Kenneth R. van Wyk
-
2006/05/05
Re: [SC-L] By default, the Verifier is disabled on .Net and Java
Gary McGraw
-
2006/05/05
Re: [SC-L] HNS - Biggest X Window security hole since 2000
ljknews
-
2006/05/05
Re: [SC-L] By default, the Verifier is disabled on .Net and Java
Stephen de Vries
-
2006/05/05
RE: [SC-L] By default, the Verifier is disabled on .Net and Java
Stephen de Vries
-
2006/05/05
Re: [SC-L] HNS - Biggest X Window security hole since 2000
Greenarrow 1
-
2006/05/05
Re: [Owasp-dotnet] Re: [SC-L] By default, the Verifier is disabled on .Net and Java
Michael Silk
-
2006/05/05
Re: [SC-L] By default, the Verifier is disabled on .Net and Java
David Eisner
-
2006/05/04
Re: [SC-L] By default, the Verifier is disabled on .Net and Java
Dinis Cruz