pendant?


On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Tobias Leich <em...@froggs.de> wrote:

> SDL2 is fine!
>
> I'll make the perl 6 pendant at some point...
>
> Kartik Thakore <thakore.kar...@gmail.com> hat geschrieben:
>
> >SDL 2.0 API is STABLE! I will be working on getting libperl-sdl2 started.
> >Any thoughts on name space?
> >
> >SDL2 seems more logical. Would there be any issues with perl for having a
> >number in the package name?
> >
> >---------- Forwarded ----------
> >From: Sam Lantinga <slou...@libsdl.org>
> >Date: Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 2:19 AM
> >Subject: [SDL] SDL 2.0 API stabilization
> >To: "A list for developers using the SDL library. (includes
> SDL-announce)" <
> >s...@lists.libsdl.org>
> >
> >
> >We're on the road to release for SDL 2.0.
> >
> >To that end, most of the existing APIs are stable, and we'll only change
> >them if it's critical.
> >There are a few things which are still being considered, such as the iOS
> >event handling, and touch/mouse event semantics, but by and large the API
> >is set for release.
> >
> >Please report bugs which are affecting you in the current snapshot:
> >http://www.libsdl.org/tmp/SDL-2.0.zip
> >
> >If anyone wants to fix anything currently in bugzilla, they are more than
> >welcome:
> >http://bugzilla.libsdl.org
> >
> >Cheers!
> >--Sam
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >SDL mailing list
> >s...@lists.libsdl.org
> >http://lists.libsdl.org/listinfo.cgi/sdl-libsdl.org
>

Reply via email to