Hello,
If you add the embargo metadata after the submission process: edit item ,
add metadata , the bitstream allows read by group anonymous.
Is you delete this policy manually, does command embargo-lifter restore the
read policy for this bitstream when the embargo expire?
I wait for your
Hi Richard:
Try this document for a fuller explanation. Let me know of any questions not
addressed in it. We will try to include it in the next release.
Thanks,
Richard R
On May 5, 2010, at 6:02 PM, Jizba, Richard wrote:
I finally realized that the Embargo Setter is reading dc.embargo.terms
Has anyone yet developed a custom Embargo setter for 1.6 that will mimic UMI's
embargo terms (6 months, 1 year, 2 years). If so, would you be willing to share
the code?
Thanks,
Jason Fowler, CA, MSLS
Archives and Special Collections Librarian
The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary
Vice
\tx1440\tx2160\tx2880\tx3600\tx4320\tx5040\tx5760\tx6480\tx7200\tx7920\tx8640\ql\qnatural\pardirnatural
\f0 \cf0 \
\
}
On Apr 29, 2010, at 2:42 PM, Blanco, Jose wrote:
I wanted to experiment with the embargo setting and I'm finding the
documentation in:
http://wiki.dspace.org/confluence/display
Hello,
We we try to approve an item that has been submitted with an embargo
date (in dc.embargo.liftdate) we receive the following error:
java.lang.NullPointerException
at
org.dspace.embargo.EmbargoManager.getEmbargoDate(EmbargoManager.java:166
)
Can anyone suggest how to resolve
@cbs.dk]
Sent: Thursday, 27 May 2010 6:44 a.m.
To: dspace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Dspace-tech] How to show the user,that there are embargo on
an item.
The new embargo feature in version 1.6 is very needed, since 50% of the
items we have in one of our arhcives are confidential
Hi...
I have a question about using the new Embargo feature. Previous to DSpace 1.6,
I used an altered version of the code developed by Terry Owen (U of Maryland).
Now I am trying to use the new Embargo feature.
I created two fields: dc.embargo.terms and dc.embargo.liftdate and added them
George,
Try to run dspace/bin/dsrun org.dspace.embargo.EmbargoManager -c
But, with this command you can´t change the bitstreams authorizations, just
check the state of embargoed Items.
Antoanne Pontes
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 4:02 PM, George Stanley Kozak g...@cornell.eduwrote:
Hi…
I have
the value to the metadata:
dc.rights.embargodate 2010-12-31
We have now for example:
http://www.openstarts.units.it/dspace/handle/10077/3384?mode=fullsubmit_sim
ple=Show+full+item+record
this item is now under embargo!
But this week I would like to set to other items the embargo..
http
Hi Jordan
This what we did:
http://wiki.lib.sun.ac.za/index.php/SUNScholar/Asset_Embargo
THANKS!!
I'have only no defined nothing in the input.xml
To understand better..
So you set the date in
dc.embargo.terms
like:
dc.embargo.terms = 2011-02-12
and nothing in
dc.embargo.lift
because
://jira.dspace.org/jira/browse/DS-506
for a way to fix that. THe next bug fix release will include this change
Thanks,
Richard R
On Mar 26, 2010, at 3:02 PM, George Stanley Kozak wrote:
Hi…
I have a question about using the new Embargo feature. Previous to DSpace 1.6,
I used an altered version of the code
Hello George,
Am 26.03.2010 20:02, schrieb George Stanley Kozak:
setting these parameters and getting the embargo working? Also, when
I try to run /dspace/bin/dspace embargo-lifter -c, I get the error:
Command not found: embargo-lifter.
The embargo-lifter is not part of the command launcher
I wanted to experiment with the embargo setting and I'm finding the
documentation in:
http://wiki.dspace.org/confluence/display/DSPACE/Embargo+1.6
to be lacking in examples, and so I'm not getting very far.
This is what I have done.
1. I have created two new dc fields for the emabargo
I built 1.6.2 with |embargo.field.terms = SCHEMA.ELEMENT.QUALIFIER and
||embargo.field.lift = SCHEMA.ELEMENT.QUALIFIER commented out thinking
that would disable embargo. When I try to enter an item I get |
java.lang.IllegalStateException: Missing one or more of the required
DSpace
A researcher at our university is worried about the embargo function and
whether or not it is possible for harvesters to get hold of the files even
though they are locked away and should be safe until the embargo is lifted. Has
anybody had a problem with this, ie harvesters harvesting embargoed
Hello George,
the embargo only works during the submission process. It will restrict
the access to the bitstreams belonging to an item, set a lift date and
change the date available. When the embargo is lifted the resource
policies are inherited from the owning collections default settings
Richard,
I've been testing the setter and have run into a problem. Here's the problem:
When I select 6 months, the submission fails. The date that it tries to set is
earlier than the date of submission. For example, if I make the submission
today (2010-05-06), it tries to set an embargo date
Hello Victoria,
the embargo is used for in progress submissions. It is intended to
prevent items from being publically available.
The lifter will restore the policies of an item (inherit default
collection policies) which got metadata of the field defined in
dspace.cfg as embargo.field.lift
Hi Jordan
This what we did:
http://wiki.lib.sun.ac.za/index.php/SUNScholar/Asset_Embargo
Cheers
hg
On 28/09/2010 17:33, Jordan PIŠCANC wrote:
HI!
We migrate from Dspace1.4 to Dspace 1.62 one month ago.
All went quite well..
We want to use the default Embargo
of Dspace 1.62 so we
, 2010 at 4:02 PM, George Stanley Kozak
g...@cornell.edumailto:g...@cornell.edu wrote:
Hi...
I have a question about using the new Embargo feature. Previous to DSpace 1.6,
I used an altered version of the code developed by Terry Owen (U of Maryland).
Now I am trying to use the new Embargo feature
Hello Jason,
the liftdate is computed based on the embargo terms and the setter used.
At the moment there is one default embargo setter:
org.dspace.embargo.DefaultEmbargoSetter
which assumes the basic use case of the term being a date.
Which setter plugin to use is configured
If applicable, enter conditions of embargo./hint
required/required
/field
But when I use this field in a submission, I can submit the item, but
can't approve it as the software seems to expect a date in that field:
2010-07-26 12:15:23,090 WARN org.dspace.content.DCDate @ Mangled
date
Hi Marvin:
Since the embargo.field.terms and embargo.field.lift properties don't refer to
any real metadata fields(SCHEMA.ELEMENT.QUALIFIER), embargo is turned off by
default - you do not need to do anything further.
Uncomment all properties that you commented out - the code will produce errors
Thanks, thet worked.
Marvin
On 10/8/2010 8:58 AM, Richard Rodgers wrote:
Hi Marvin:
Since the embargo.field.terms and embargo.field.lift properties don't
refer to any real metadata fields(SCHEMA.ELEMENT.QUALIFIER), embargo
is turned off by default - you do not need to do anything further
: tt tt thl@cbs.dkmailto:thl@cbs.dk
Dato: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 08:12:45 +0200
Til:
dspace-tech@lists.sourceforge.netmailto:dspace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net
dspace-tech@lists.sourceforge.netmailto:dspace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net
Emne: Embargo and OAI interface
We are having a few 1.6.x
not to harvest
those items, Primo can only manipulate the harvested data.
Tonny
Den 06/05/2011 kl. 16.49 skrev Richard Rodgers:
Hi Tonny:
The embargo system is designed to protect bitstreams, not metadata. While it
certainly would be possible to alter OAI or other code to check for embargo
dates
is not clear.
It's fairly general, so if it works for you, we can include it in the next
distribution.
Thanks,
Richard R
On May 3, 2010, at 11:27 AM, Jason Fowler wrote:
Has anyone yet developed a custom Embargo setter for 1.6 that will mimic
UMI's embargo terms (6 months, 1 year, 2 years
[mailto:blan...@umich.edu]
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 3:56 PM
To: Richard Rodgers; Jizba, Richard
Cc: dspace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Dspace-tech] More re: Embargo error on Approval
Richard, Thank you very much for this documentation. I’ve been experimenting
with it today, and I
I sent the mail below a week ago to the tech-list but I didn't receive any
responds on it.
I really need some help on this, so if anyone knows a fix…..
Thanks,
Tonny
Fra: tt tt thl@cbs.dkmailto:thl@cbs.dk
Dato: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 08:12:45 +0200
Til:
dspace-tech
it as the software seems to expect a date in that field:
2010-07-26 12:15:23,090 WARN org.dspace.content.DCDate @ Mangled
date: Two day embargo. ..failed all attempts to parse as date.
I was under the impression that this field existed to give an
explanation of the embargo; I've already got
On Sep 9, 2010, at 9:41 AM, Mark H. Wood wrote:
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 06:18:18PM -0400, Richard Rodgers wrote:
If you look at the class DefaultEmbargoSetter (in org.dspace.embargo) the
method
'parseTerms' creates the lift date out of what EmbargoManager passes it
(which is the contents
Thanks Claudia.
Do you know where I can find documentation on this subject?
Regards.
Victoria Rasero
Biblioteca de la Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
2010/9/10 Claudia Jürgen
?
Regards.
Victoria Rasero
Biblioteca de la Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
2010/9/10 Claudia Jürgenclaudia.juer...@ub.tu-dortmund.de
Hello Victoria,
the embargo is used
Thank you!!!
From: Richard Rodgers [mailto:rrodg...@mit.edu]
Sent: Friday, May 21, 2010 1:54 PM
To: Blanco, Jose
Cc: Jizba, Richard; dspace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Dspace-tech] More re: Embargo error on Approval
Hi Jose:
See inline
Thanks,
Richard
On May 21, 2010, at 10:27 AM
I think that launcher.xml should indicate what to run for embargo-lifter, but
there is no entry for it. Is this a bug in 1.6?
Thanks!
Jose
From: Blanco, Jose [mailto:blan...@umich.edu]
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 3:56 PM
To: Richard Rodgers; Jizba, Richard
Cc: dspace-tech
[mailto:claudia.juer...@ub.tu-dortmund.de]
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 9:29 AM
To: dspace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Dspace-tech] Question about setting embargoes
Hello George,
Am 26.03.2010 20:02, schrieb George Stanley Kozak:
setting these parameters and getting the embargo working? Also
.
Thanks,
Richard R
On May 3, 2010, at 11:27 AM, Jason Fowler wrote:
Has anyone yet developed a custom Embargo setter for 1.6 that will mimic
UMI's embargo terms (6 months, 1 year, 2 years). If so, would you be willing
to share the code?
Thanks,
Jason Fowler, CA, MSLS
Archives and Special
: Richard Rodgers [rrodg...@mit.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2010 2:02 PM
To: Jason Fowler
Cc: DSpace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Dspace-tech] Embargo setter plugin question
Hi Jason:
Bit of an email glitch in my last reply: looks like the text became an
attachment. But the gist is:
I
On 6 May 2010 00:02, Jizba, Richard richardji...@creighton.edu wrote:
I finally realized that the Embargo Setter is reading dc.embargo.terms
for the date rather than dc.embargo.liftdate.
I’ve check our dspace.cfg file and there does not seem to be a mix-up. Nor
is there a mix-up
: Richard Rodgers [mailto:rrodg...@mit.edu]
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 6:18 PM
To: Blanco, Jose
Cc: Jizba, Richard; dspace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Dspace-tech] More re: Embargo error on Approval
Hi Jose:
Re #1. Date would be safe, but then you would not be able to enter
Thanks, Alexander. I don't think the patch will help us, but it does
give me an idea for how to approach the problem.
Many thanks,
Jason
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 3:09 PM, Alexander Lemann ablem...@bsu.edu wrote:
On 5/16/2011 1:54 PM, Jason Fowler wrote:
We are using DSpace 1.6.2 with XMLUI
: Thursday, May 06, 2010 5:53 AM
To: Jizba, Richard
Cc: dspace-tech@lists.sourceforge.netmailto:dspace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Dspace-tech] More re: Embargo error on Approval
Hi Richard:
Try this document for a fuller explanation. Let me know of any questions not
addressed in it. We
Fellow DSpace Techs -
I'm attempting to get the embargo patch working against a fresh
installation of dspace 1.5.2 per the instructions available at the
following URL:
http://wiki.dspace.org/index.php/User:Emetsger:Embargo:Downloads_here
Despite my best efforts, I am not able to set
hint If applicable, enter conditions of embargo./hint
required/required
/field
But when I use this field in a submission, I can submit the item, but
can't approve it as the software seems to expect a date in that field:
2010-07-26 12:15:23,090 WARN
of the embargo feature, to make the bitstream inaccessible to anyone or
anything (the only exception being Administrative Users) until a
particular date has passed.
- Tim
--
Tim Donohue
Technical Lead for DSpace Project
DuraSpace.org
On 6/10/2011 5:49 AM, Caroline Karregård wrote
handle to another
From: Richard Rodgers [mailto:rrodg...@mit.edu]
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 5:53 AM
To: Jizba, Richard
Cc: dspace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Dspace-tech] More re: Embargo error on Approval
Hi Richard:
Try this document for a fuller explanation. Let me know of any
On 31 March 2010 20:35, Richard Rodgers rrodg...@mit.edu wrote:
Hi Hilton:
Not really - the assumption of the embargo system is that once content has
been made generally available, it no longer makes sense to embargo it
(since embargo traditionally means withholding exposure until some
to use the new
DayTableEmbargoSetter with an old version of DSpace, or if you'd be
better off just waiting for 1.7.0 in a few weeks. Someone who is more
familiar with that Embargo code may be able to comment on that.
- Tim
On 11/26/2010 12:40 PM, Tim Ribaric wrote:
Hello Everyone,
I saw
)
--
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 5 May 2010 16:04:46 -0500
From: Jizba, Richard richardji...@creighton.edu
Subject: [Dspace-tech] Embargo error on Approval
To: dspace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net
Message-ID:
21ce15cd4586f94bb6c11c996aa122a90789c...@exbe02.blue.jays.creighton.edu
Hi Stuart:
I'll take a crack at some of your questions: see remarks inline below.
Thanks,
Richard R
On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 17:40 +1300, stuart yeates wrote:
I have some questions about the Embargo plugin in 1.6. I'm basing this
on http://wiki.dspace.org/index.php/Embargo_1.6 and trolling
to be manually assigned a
lift date and have it's read policies removed - the embargo stuff doesn't have
batch tools for this.
Does this address your question?
Richard
On Mar 31, 2010, at 2:59 PM, Hilton Gibson wrote:
On 31 March 2010 20:35, Richard Rodgers
rrodg...@mit.edumailto:rrodg...@mit.edu
of a custom embargo to the new embargo
mechanism, troubleshooting some ongoing bugs we have with
case-sensitivity display of jpg's, and knowledge transfer for our staff.
Thanks for anything you can share on or off list.
--Jimmy
--
Jimmy Ghaphery
Head, Library Information Systems
VCU Libraries
http
On 1 November 2010 08:16, Sean Carte sean.ca...@gmail.com wrote:
What I would like to do is insert information about the embargo at
this point. Is that possible?
To clarify, what I was thinking was that on this password-login page I
could add logic that would add a message about the embargo
Hi all,
How do I add text to the 'Files in this item' section informing users that this
item is under embargo?
Here's an example: http://eric.ex.ac.uk/exeter/handle/10036/119585
I'm using Dspace 1.6 and xmlui, this is my version:
https://vmeric.exeter.ac.uk/repository/handle/10769/143
Any
file.
Cocoon stacktrace [show]
Java stacktrace [show]
Java full stacktrace [show]
I have the Embargo Commented out.
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Jeffrey Trimble
System LIbrarian
William F. Maag Library
Youngstown State University
330.941.2483 (Office)
jatrim...@ysu.edu
http://www.maag.ysu.edu
http
We are using DSpace 1.6.2 with XMLUI and embargoes enabled. We have a setter
in place that Richard Rogers developed, and it has worked great. The embargo
system blocks access to a bitstream until the appropriate date.
We would like, however, to have a specific notification along the lines
I have a new installation of dspace 1.7 using XMLUI and a custom theme. I have
set up embargo and added the field to the submission form. I was curious if
there was a way I could add the jquery ui data chooser to that field? For that
matter, how could I add javascript to any
I have some questions about the Embargo plugin in 1.6. I'm basing this
on http://wiki.dspace.org/index.php/Embargo_1.6 and trolling through the
subversion repository (dspace-1.6.0-rc1 tag).
We'd like to have an drop-down box in our self-deposit which allows
users to select an embargo period
Hi Sean,
I'm not an expert on the embargo system, but I think you could do the following:
Embargos are 'set' and 'lifted'. The business logic for these are implemented
in java classes such as:
- org.dspace.embargo.DefaultEmbargoSetter
- org.dspace.embargo.DefaultEmbargoLifter
In the setter
Is there any way to place batch imported items under embargo during the batch
import process?
Thanks,
Jason Fowler, CA, MSLS
Archives and Special Collections Librarian
The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary
President, ALABI
jfow...@sbts.edu
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 06:18:18PM -0400, Richard Rodgers wrote:
If you look at the class DefaultEmbargoSetter (in org.dspace.embargo) the
method
'parseTerms' creates the lift date out of what EmbargoManager passes it
(which is the contents
of the metadata field configured for the 'terms
in
different forms (e.g. how do I enable it?, how does it work?, etc.)
Might be best to make this easier for everyone with a pre-configured
version -- and let them decide if they want to extend it or not.
- Tim
On 9/9/2010 10:10 AM, Mark H. Wood wrote:
I worked over the Javadoc in the embargo
Yes, a *complete* working configuration (commented out as needed)
would be a good idea. The embargo facility is very flexible, which is
good, but that means that it takes more than plugging in a couple of
tokens to make it work, which can be a bit obscure.
But the documentation should then point
On 29 October 2010 19:58, Richard Rodgers rrodg...@mit.edu wrote:
Hi Sean:
I'm not sure what details you might want to include, but since the embargo
information is all carried in standard metadata fields,
you could (using whatever UI stack you are on JSPUI, XMLUI) have the UI
detect
Hello Everyone,
I saw this in the DSpace manual:
http://www.dspace.org/1_6_2Documentation/ch05.html#N13501 and it talks about
implementing the Embargo settings with a change in the Embargo Setter. In
particular it says to use this line:
plugin.single.org.dspace.embargo.EmbargoSetter
On Fri, 6 May 2011, Richard Rodgers wrote:
The embargo system is designed to protect bitstreams, not metadata.
While it certainly would be possible to alter OAI or other code to check
for embargo dates, this has not been done to the best of my knowledge. I
am curious why, given
is not public accessibly in Primo. We can't configure Primo not to harvest
those items, Primo can only manipulate the harvested data.
Tonny
Den 06/05/2011 kl. 16.49 skrev Richard Rodgers:
Hi Tonny:
The embargo system is designed to protect bitstreams, not metadata. While it
certainly
restriction, which can be
accomplished with standard DSpace administrative tools [and admin changes can
me made anytime].
Does that make sense?
Thanks,
Richard
On Mar 31, 2010, at 1:20 PM, Hilton Gibson wrote:
Hi All
With respect to older items already submitted, can one impose an embargo
On 3 August 2010 22:03, Richard Rodgers rrodg...@mit.edu wrote:
Hi Sean:
See comments below - but I think you now have a correct understanding..
Thanks,
Richard
On Jul 26, 2010, at 10:23 AM, Sean Carte sean.ca...@gmail.com wrote:
On 26 July 2010 14:30, Hilton Gibson hilton.gib
On 04/08/2010 15:23, Sean Carte wrote:
On 3 August 2010 22:03, Richard Rodgersrrodg...@mit.edu wrote:
Hi Sean:
See comments below - but I think you now have a correct understanding..
Thanks,
Richard
On Jul 26, 2010, at 10:23 AM, Sean Carte sean.ca...@gmail.com wrote:
On 26
decide if they want to extend it or not.
- Tim
On 9/9/2010 10:10 AM, Mark H. Wood wrote:
I worked over the Javadoc in the embargo package, to improve my
understanding and (I hope) to fill in the overall process and
requirements a bit. Committed revision 5342.
The new package comments might
Hi All
This is what we did.
http://wiki.lib.sun.ac.za/index.php/SUNScholar/Asset_Embargo
Cheers
hg
On 09/09/2010 18:08, Tim Donohue wrote:
Hi Richard,
What I mean by preconfigure is the following:
(1) Pre-create embargo metadata fields which DSpace will use by default,
and pre
Hello Jason,
the embargo only works during the submission process not if you edit add
the metadata to an already archived item.
It will not make the item invisible but restrict the access to the
bitstreams belonging to an item, set a lift date and change the date
available. When
Hi Tim:
Just a remark below:
Richard
On Sep 9, 2010, at 11:29 AM, Tim Donohue wrote:
I'd actually go one further and say:
(1) We should update the manual to make clearer (like Mark suggests)
AND
(2) We should work to ship 1.7 with a default embargo already setup
(i.e. pre
it some lipstick
to look pretty. (Language style consistency, look, feel.)
Now that embargo is in the current release, the time has come to
upgrade the docs
for this.
My $.03 worth.
--Jeff
On Sep 9, 2010, at 11:29 AM, Tim Donohue wrote:
I'd actually go one further and say:
(1) We should
I was using item import and noticed that accession and available date are
duplicated. In looking at the code, this seems to have to do with the embargo
logic. None of the items I was itemimporting were embargoed. I'm using
version 1.7, is this a bug that was corrected for 1.7.1? I did
when browsing. Is that the
case? Could you share the code that does that?
Thank you!
Jose
From: Tom De Mulder [td...@cam.ac.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2011 5:38 AM
To: dspace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Dspace-tech] Embargo and OAI
On 5/16/2011 1:54 PM, Jason Fowler wrote:
We are using DSpace 1.6.2 with XMLUI and embargoes enabled. We have a
setter in place that Richard Rogers developed, and it has worked
great. The embargo system blocks access to a bitstream until the
appropriate date.
We would like, however, to have
Jason:
Yes, that's right - input-forms must be updated. But I regard it on balance
an advantage that the embargo system 'inherits' all the configurability of
standard DSpace metadata -
not just in submission, but indexing, display and more (so you could, e.g. do
fielded search on embargo
the setting - which simply consists of removing the read
policies
on the bitstreams.
Does that help, or further confuse?
To get embargo working, you just need to make sure that the embargo.terms
embargo.lift properties are configured,
and they point to metadata fields that exist, and are in input
2009/10/28 Patrick Etienne patrick.etie...@library.gatech.edu:
Fellow DSpace Techs -
I'm attempting to get the embargo patch working against a fresh installation
of dspace 1.5.2 per the instructions available at the following URL:
http://wiki.dspace.org/index.php
Hi Jason:
I can see that this might be confusing, so let me try to explain a little more
clearly.
At the most basic level, the field containing the 'terms' is where a submitter
specifies how the embargo should work for that item.
At the time of installation into the archive (i.e. when
]
Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2010 12:14 PM
To: Jason Fowler
Cc: claudia.juer...@ub.tu-dortmund.de
Subject: RE: [Dspace-tech] Embargoes in 1.6
Hello Jason,
only the embargo terms afaik. The liftdate is computed based upon the terms.
Claudia
Thanks, Claudia! Just one more question. Do I need to add
The documentation lists the configuration values that the
org.dspace.embargo package looks at. But there doesn't seem to be any
code anywhere in that package, or anywhere else, which actually sets
the embargo terms or lift date. Did I miss something? How do I get a
submission embargoed using
I worked over the Javadoc in the embargo package, to improve my
understanding and (I hope) to fill in the overall process and
requirements a bit. Committed revision 5342.
The new package comments might serve as an appropriate starting point for
expanding the manual in this area.
--
Mark H
Currently attempting to access an embargoed bitstream results in 'The
file is restricted' (xmlui.BitstreamReader.auth_message) message. I
can change the content of that message in messages.xml, of course, but
I wonder if it would be possible to include details of the embargo
either at that point
in the resourcepolicy table would get me a good part of the way
there..
I need this as part of a DSpace upgrade where embargo data from the
start_date field in resourcepolicy needs to find its way into the
metadatavalue table.
thanks,
Jimmy
--
Jimmy Ghaphery
Head, Library Information Systems
VCU
Hi All
With respect to older items already submitted, can one impose an embargo on
them without a migration and re-submission ?
Cheers
hg.
On 31 March 2010 16:21, Richard Rodgers rrodg...@mit.edu wrote:
Hi Jason:
One thought: have you added those fields to your input-forms.xml? In other
to answer more specific questions or
you may be more interested in contacting our project architect, Ryan
Scherle rsche...@nescent.org, who would be glad to give you more
details about the work we've had them do.
Hope that helps...
Kevin
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 4:24 PM, Jimmy Ghaphery jghap
Hi Sean:
I'm not sure what details you might want to include, but since the embargo
information is all carried in standard metadata fields,
you could (using whatever UI stack you are on JSPUI, XMLUI) have the UI detect
if the item is embargoed
(essentially, that just means
, they still
won't provide useful information to the outside world.
Just another 2 cents.
B--
On 9/9/2010 at 10:08 AM, in message 4c890699.5050...@duraspace.org, Tim
Donohue tdono...@duraspace.org wrote:
Hi Richard,
What I mean by preconfigure is the following:
(1) Pre-create embargo metadata
change I made to the
search results portion of this. That was not so ugly.
-Jose
From: Tom De Mulder [td...@cam.ac.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2011 8:40 AM
To: dspace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Dspace-tech] Embargo and OAI interface
On Tue, 10
to manage community and sub-community
relationships
- create-administrator: Create a DSpace administrator account
- dsprop: View a DSpace property from dspace.cfg
- dsrun: Run a class directly
- embargo-lifter: Embargo manager tool used to check, list and lift
embargoes
- export: Export
of this. That was not so ugly.
-Jose
From: Tom De Mulder [td...@cam.ac.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2011 8:40 AM
To: dspace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Dspace-tech] Embargo and OAI interface
On Tue, 10 May 2011, Blanco, Jose wrote:
I have been working
, don't worry, we're all very friendly! Feel free to introduce
yourself when you join the room, and let us know if you've found
anything in your testing.
Enjoy your preview of DSpace 1.6! As a reminder, here's a list of the
major new features to look out for:
* Improved Statistics
* Embargo
Hi Jason:
One thought: have you added those fields to your input-forms.xml? In other
respects, the embargo fields behave just like any other metadata, and can be
added to the default set - or any collection-specifc set - of metadata fields
used in web submission. The tech doc has instructions
,
Embargo, and Refworks.
db.maxconnections = 50
db.maxwait = 5000
db.maxidle = 5
2 assetstores at 300GB each (using currently 323 GB)
Number of items: 14,960
Number of Communities/Collections: 789
3. Java 1.5.0_24
4. Apache 2.29 running mod_jk to tomcat
On Dec 8, 2010, at 2:20 PM, Jason Fowler wrote:
Is there any way to place batch imported items under embargo during the batch
import process?
Thanks,
Jason Fowler, CA, MSLS
Archives and Special Collections Librarian
The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary
President, ALABI
jfow...@sbts.edu
On Tue, 10 May 2011, Blanco, Jose wrote:
I have been working lately on hiding items from search results that have
READ metadata restrictions for certain users. So for example, item1 is
restricted to only one particular user, if that user is logged-in and
searches for a string in that item
On May 10, 2011, at 2:38 AM, Tom De Mulder wrote:
On Fri, 6 May 2011, Richard Rodgers wrote:
I'd like to ask for a flag in the dspace config file to let dark items be
properly dark (including embargoed items). This applies to search results
as well as (possibly even more so
1 - 100 of 114 matches
Mail list logo
