On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 8:52 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
cpu% grep home crash.txt
take me back home
http://mirtchovski.com/screenshots/ffmpeg.gif
A question in total innocence: What does Vim really buy you?
it buys you a negative. I won't have to hear people whine any more about
I was not sure what was on there but found
http://damnsmalllinux.org/cgi-bin/forums/ikonboard.cgi?act=Print;f=8;t=19312
Posted by 9a6or on Nov. 18 2007,05:25
lspci in DSL gives:
Code Sample
:00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corp.: Unknown device 2590 (rev 04)
:00:02.0 VGA compatible
I've been wanting a desktop calculator for some time. I'm sitting on
the plane, trying to avoid real work, and decided to see if I could do
this:
1. put a dc behind /srv/desk
2. start a rio in a window
3. window 1 becomes cat /srv/desk
4. other windows are stupid programs that, on mouse click,
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 3:43 PM, Federico G. Benavento
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
what about:
% dc [0=1] | echo 0 /srv/desk
well I knew somebody would tell me how to do this. Damn. Nice.
ron
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 3:43 PM, Federico G. Benavento
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2 graphical calculators for Plan 9.
http://plan9.aichi-u.ac.jp/netlib/demos/suzuki/s41.html
neat. But I like the perversity of using a window manager as my
control process.
For example, for a memory value, I can
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 3:51 PM, Pietro Gagliardi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 31, 2008, at 6:43 PM, Federico G. Benavento wrote:
what about:
% dc [0=1] | echo 0 /srv/desk
Does that even do anything? You can't pipe to echo, can you?
try it first then send email. Try, try, try.
btw another nice thing about having a desk calculator with the fd
hanging out in /srv/desk: I can have any process (awk pipeline) feed
commands into /srv/desk and have it pop up in my desk calculator.
Don't know why I didn't do this before. Also, it would be easy to drop
three dc processes at the
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 6:29 AM, Eric Van Hensbergen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wouldn't plumbing be better for this sort of thing?
yeah, good idea, you could prepend calculations with a string. But
more important is that your calculator needs to have a channel that is
global and available to
Actually I got concerned about other big problems with echo. It was
pointed out on this list that this was confusing:
whatever | echo 0 /srv/whatever
I mean, how can you pipe to echo? So I have a fixed version.
Now, the sequence above will check fd 0 in the namespace. If it is a
pipe, it will
Unless this file got truncated, all I see here are walks and stats and
clunks of a file, nothing more (I used wireshark to walk the file --
it breaks out 9p pretty nicely). I don't see any twstat or open or
create ... Am I missing something?
ron
btw, this 'unkown mode' -- what is all this you wonder?
what's
p9_errstr2errno: errstr :unknown mode: not found
Not found? Huh? This is the errstr (from plan 9) to errno (for
ancient, primitive OSes that don't have errstr, i.e. 'all of them').
I see in fossil/9p.c this for create:
On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 11:57 PM, Matthias Teege [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
; cp /n/crn/usr/mtg/testmail.txt /tmp
; cp /tmp/testmail.txt /n/crn/usr/mtg/testmail2.txt
I'm more confused. You get the same error for each of these?
to sum up:
these are running on linux. First is copy from remote
On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 11:57 PM, Matthias Teege [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
; cp /n/crn/usr/mtg/testmail.txt /tmp
; cp /tmp/testmail.txt /n/crn/usr/mtg/testmail2.txt
sorry, being dumb, time to go to bed. So the trace clearly shows the
first one succeeding.
There's never any sign that the
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 7:15 PM, erik quanstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The two upticks on the top one usually mean trouble with the timer. I
can't imagine why it is happening.
missyncronized tsc?
Good possibility, but without knowing what it was run on it's hard to
say. Obviously, we
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 2:19 PM, Pietro Gagliardi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
rEFIT fails me. Back to waiting.
send the mac to me. I will fix it as I fixed Gorka's mac.
ron
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 12:21 PM, Juan M. Mendez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm interested Ron, Any change to thnx to get it working with new lguest?
have not tested with full up thnx yet. I am going to pull down a
release 2.6.25 and make sure it still works with that.
oh yes, to install lguest, you MUST:
modprobe lg syscall_vector=64
This sets the right syscall vector.
ron
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 4:22 PM, erik quanstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
just put it up on a tee: why not use aoe?
I had not even thought of that. How do you recommend setting it up?
ron
you can do what you will, with your indentation-based language, but
that won't change the fact that indentation for lexical scope is a
horrible idea.
I first saw it in a language in 1978 called Offal, by Aron Insinga.
Aron was smart: after 6 weeks, he said, this sucks, and put it away.
When I saw
On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 9:41 PM, John Barham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I first saw it in a language in 1978 called Offal, by Aron Insinga.
Well with a name like Offal at least he wasn't setting expectations too
high...
Just about as high as Python went, it turns out :-)
ron
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 7:05 AM, Enrico Weigelt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've found some discussions about an direct 9P channel in xen
(so all devices can be served from dom0 via 9P, w/o hw emulation).
Does anyone know some bit more about this ?
it's an ericvh and lucho project, and it will be
On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 9:51 AM, Enrico Weigelt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi folks,
as some of you already might know, Gentoo has plan9port
(in the plan9 overlay), splitted into several packages.
But it builds the whole p9p for the each single package
(and just copies out the relevant
I'm trying to get plan 9 to boot in AMDs simnow as part of tracking a
weird problem.
There's some weird issue between simnow and 9load.
Here is what happens, on floppy or iso:
initial probe, to find plan9.ini...
I then see 661,504 reads (in the case of the ISO) or few number of
reads (in the
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 7:13 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mount /srv/9660 /n/9660 /dev/sdC0/data
This one lost me completely. /dev/sdC0/data? That's an iso on your system?
ron
it seems reasonable on first glance. What's the stack barf look like?
ron
I love it. 9load is dying in real mode on:
1000:012C B80800 mov ax,0008
1000:012F 8ED8 mov ds,ax
^^^
takes a triple fault, which is interesting, as vm is not on.
But this is kind of intriguing because that's not how I
something seems not quite right. Or maybe I'm just missing something.
in drawterm,
fcp (or cp) xyz /mnt/term/tmp
is now running at about 5 kilobits/sec. That is not a typo.
I'm must wondering if anyone else is seeing this kind of performance.
I'm seeing from a very recent copy from swtch.com,
here's the best help I can give: don't use xen.
Use qemu, kvm, or lguest, all of which are far easier to set up.
thanks
ron
p.s. I wrote the first Xen port. If Xen had not turned bad, I would
not be giving you this advice.
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 8:56 PM, Curt Micol [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could you explain what 'turned bad' and why you no longer prefer xen?
This is just for my own curiosity, I'd like to hear your opinion.
I'll also begin looking through the archives to see if I missed
something there.
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 3:54 PM, Pietro Gagliardi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, I wasn't around that time :-) But I was looking for the Hello World X11
paper a while back, which was pre-website USENIX. But on the USENIX website
it seems that you can purchase papers from before 1991(?). Perhaps
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 5:16 PM, Bakul Shah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not quite the same but perhaps you are thinking of Hardware
Profiling of Kernels by Andrew McRae in Winter 1993 usenix.
From his paper:
it's good enough, and my memory probably is bad enough that this is
the right one.
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 11:34 AM, Digby Tarvin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am interested in connecting more than one graphics adapter so that
one can be dedicated to low level diagnostics (rather than the more
usual dual head user interface).. but I am not sure how the hardware
deals with that
is back.
it was drop shipped from NM to CA. by which I mean it was dropped,
then shipped. and it survived.
Let's all thank lbl.gov for hosting 9grid.net
ron
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 1:43 AM, Nyang A. Phra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Poking around Plan 9 and 9P, I was wondering whether it would be a
neat hack or some sort of abuse to read and write dynamically served
files at different offsets to get different semantics, instead of
reading and writing
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 3:04 PM, Charles Forsyth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don't try this with 8a. 8a is too damn smart
no, it's simply following instructions.
i meant that as praise for 8a if that came across wrong.
ron
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 4:00 PM, Iruata Souza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't have any solaris boxes to play now, but I remember when taking
a dtrace course - more or less two years ago - that I managed to see
the performance of a nice machine go down only by setting all it's
tracing points.
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 3:50 PM, Charles Forsyth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don't try this with 8a. 8a is too damn smart
no, it's simply following instructions.
i meant that as praise for 8a if that came across wrong.
not at all: i meant that as a description of 8a's algorithm to eliminate
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 4:24 AM, Enrico Weigelt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi folks,
is anyone already working on an venti-based storage format
which is optimized for streaming ?
ah, well, what's this mean? What kind of data rate are you looking at?
ron
FYI. Please note that this is international.
thanks
ron
-- Forwarded message --
From: ronald g. minnich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 6:14 PM
Subject: [Fwd: [sc08committee] FW: High Performance Computing Ph.D.
Fellowship Applications due 9/8]
To: ron minnich
I just got a fujitsu lifebook, which seems to be mostly compatible, or
used to be.
ron
forget silly qemu question. The footprint of plan 9 has grown and I
had not realized how tiny my memory was set. Sorry for noise, please
change channel.
ron
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 10:33 AM, Russ Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
p9skclient: gettickets: Connection timed out
Aha! Factotum uses ndb (the library, not the program)
to map from auth domain to auth server. If it can't find
a mapping, it tries to use the auth domain as a machine
name
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 4:04 PM, Eric Van Hensbergen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lucho had a mount helper at one time that was able to use p9p to
authenticate when necessary -- this would be a nice feature to include
in the mount helper but is difficult to include without p9p as a
dependency.
building on x86 64 bit.
first issue is that I get this:make: vx32-gcc: Command not found
second is that I get this:
gcc -Ilibvx32 -c -g -O3 -MD -std=gnu99 -I. -o libvx32/linux.o libvx32/linux.c
libvx32/linux.c: In function `vx32_sighandler':
libvx32/linux.c:254: error: structure has no member
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 7:57 AM, ron minnich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
building on x86 64 bit.
first issue is that I get this:make: vx32-gcc: Command not found
second is that I get this:
gcc -Ilibvx32 -c -g -O3 -MD -std=gnu99 -I. -o libvx32/linux.o libvx32/linux.c
libvx32/linux.c
I'm on this 32 bit machine using vx32. Wow, nice. Boots like a bat.
now all I want is my fossil and venti :-)
This is really sweet. I think we've got an easy way to show people Plan 9 now.
thanks Russ!
ron
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 4:29 PM, Brian L. Stuart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I haven't tried this yet, but is there any reason you
couldn't put block special files for disk partitions
in the 9vx directory and put the arenas, etc there,
assuming of course all the permissions were set right?
I
on .10, I can run venti/venti. on .11, it locks up 9vx quite
thoroughly after it prints init If you resize the window it is
filled with garbage. Under strace I can see it taking the timer
interrupts.
Linux xcpu 2.6.25 #6 SMP Tue May 27 09:46:16 PDT 2008 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
Sorry I don't
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 7:21 PM, erik quanstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
this slashdot article almost asks for cpu
functionality for plan 9 by name.
actually, this the scenario for which we designed xcpu, almost exactly.
Mount, start up, disconnect, come back later ... I've used it this way.
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 10:33 AM, Russ Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you invoke it with the -A flag, then it will go into a
sleep loop on panic (-A stands for abort, but that didn't
work very well on OS X). You can then attach with gdb
and get a stack trace or look at what the other
well, Eris, it is quite possible that you're right. It is also
possible that you never quite got it.
Or both are possible.
ron
I just pulled the hg and built 9vx from sources.
venti copy has not died yet. :-)
ron
Thread 8 (Thread -1759208560 (LWP 2898)):
#0 0xb7f2e424 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
#1 0x4e6f7a43 in poll () from /lib/libc.so.6
#2 0x4117fa99 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libX11.so.6
#3 0x4117fe7f in _XRead () from /usr/lib/libX11.so.6
#4 0x411816bb in _XReadEvents () from /usr/lib/libX11.so.6
#5
our power grid in the US is, well, interesting:
http://www.ncsa.uiuc.edu/People/hkhurana/IFIP_CIP_08.pdf
yowie.
ron
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 6:16 AM, Russ Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this another out of memory? This
happened on a mk clean on kernel source
It would not surprise me if the new pager (post-0.12)
caused the problem, but in order for that
to happen the kernel would have had to print
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 6:40 AM, erik quanstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's a bigger question, now that I've read the paper and briefly
scanned the code. Do you have some thoughts on the long term ability
of vx32 to get close to unity performance on a system (like Plan 9)
with a high rate
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 8:55 AM, Uriel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If there was a single codebase shared
across projects none of this would be an issue at all.
you are right but it's a hard problem, we're all tight for time, so
the only fix is for somebody to step up and do it.
But your question,
I got annoyed with the idea of lguest being broken, I was stuck on a
long flight, so I redid l.s and fixed it. The new l.s has the
improvements from sources, mainly the 8M pte map instead of the
earlier 4M pte map.
it's also seriously cleaned up to take into account the new lguest
improvements
noble goal: look like plan 9 docs
ways to goal:
1. troff
2. tex with the right macros
3. lyx with the right layouts
so I have this paper written in lyx, if anyone has a pointer to (3), let me know
ron
On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 8:56 AM, erik quanstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
personally, i feel it would be more useful to be
able to use plan 9's native network stack. but
i'm biased. i want to send aoe/cec/il packets.
Part of the reason I have not stopped using lguest, although now I use
both
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 11:27 AM, andrey mirtchovski
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is your app export-controlled?
No. That was the first thought that hit my mind.
ron
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 9:04 AM, erik quanstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if that's the argument, wouldn't it make sense to get
rid of plan 9?
Think of 9vx and lguest and friends as software tools. Software
tools did a lot to popularize the ideas of Unix, and made it easier
for people to
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 1:15 PM, William Josephson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've found setting up diskless boot with Linux to be a major
pain with most of the common distributions.
yes, they all suck. Try this: onesis.org
for a reasonable system, used at sandia on a 4096-node cluster.
for
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 5:01 PM, don bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But Linux use symlinks. Is there a way to make symlinks
on the Plan 9 filesystem and make them accessible with NFS?
The kernel probably doesn't care. Symlinks are just files
whose contents are another file's path. As long as
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 8:17 PM, Eric Van Hensbergen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And now you need extended attributes in order to support SElinux or
RedHat behaves weirdly. It really never does end.
unless we all get smart and go into banking.
ron
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 2:10 AM, Kernel Panic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ron minnich wrote:
futex?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Futex
so do we need a futtocks device?
i think this can be implemented without
any additional devices... wtf?
what the futex? I was mainly joking. I
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 5:41 AM, erik quanstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
as you've pointed out, performance-wise it's not copying vs. nothing
it's copying vs page faults and trips through the vm code.
i would think playing vm games (as linus likes to say) would make
scheduling on mp harder
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 6:45 AM, erik quanstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i haven't found this to be the case.
it's not always the case.
in a former life, one i'd rather forget, i did
full text search.
in order to return the full text, we had to go
get the document. due to the very
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 4:49 AM, erik quanstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
very, very cool. thanks for the link, ron.
i wonder if richard feynman (who is mentioned) might
have criticized the ops/s vs. time graph on p. 5 for being
overly fit to one end point -- the accounting machines
in the
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 1:20 PM, erik quanstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but what i'd really like is a drawterm replacement with its own
local devices. without local devices, there isn't much of an
advantage over drawterm — unless your cpu server many
ms away. graphics over the internet can
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 6:31 PM, erik quanstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
what's the advantage over drawterm in this configuration?
latency. The interactive program (e.g. acme) is on my machine, not on
a remote machine. Rio is local. And so on.
ron
note that you really need to run latest now, e.g. 2.6.25 with the
newest lguest port.
ron
it's fixed for me, the new code is on sources or so I recall. I just
ran it yesterday.
Someone else reported a problem, I don't have time to work on it until
next week.
thanks
ron
so it can go here: http://bellard.org/qemu/download.html
might as well make it available ..
ron
more useless crap from memory:
the actual correct usage is
//GO.SYSIN DD *
but of course the * would make things messy.
See this and realize this stuff is still being taught!
http://www.coba.unt.edu/itds/courses/bcis3690/bcis3690.htm
ron
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 8:19 AM, erik quanstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you can't make the assumption that a file is local in *ix, either.
in fact, for the last 20 years, every program run on a sunos/solaris
machine has used mmap for the exec.
ron
In the HPC world, there is lots of conservatism. There is an editor at
LANL, named Fred, written in Fortran, that has been in use for longer
than most of you have been alive. Until very recently, it was a
required part of any HPC system.
So, we're doing a binary compatibility module so we can run
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 8:21 AM, Steven D. Vormwald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So would developers on this platform be encouraged to use languages and
features currently in plan 9 for HPC development, or would they target
existing HPC languages and features, which would be added to plan 9,
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 8:25 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Just a dumb question, as i'm totally out of this business, it is easier to
write an emulator than translate the applications to plan9 c ? (for example)
or to write (or port) the C++ and Fortran compilers and related tools?
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 11:03 AM, don bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you elaborate here? What tricks can the IBM compilers use
that the Plan 9 ones can't? Are we talking optimization?
yes. Quite impressive optimization. Which results in very high
measured performance. At least when I've
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 4:36 PM, David Leimbach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So is there any traction to use the new platform, or is it mostly just
people running their familiar apps and writing new apps for their familiar
programming environment?
There are always users who are adventurous. I'm
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 6:48 PM, David Leimbach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does Plan 9 Port help? I mean, libthread on Plan 9 Port alone could be
worth a ton to me in some situations.
Concurrent programming for the win?
probably not for this community. When we had plan9port in xcpu we got
For some time now, over 10 years anyway, the GNU world has been using
the linker to create initialized structs, viz:
static const struct cpu_driver driver __cpu_driver = {
.ops = cpu_dev_ops,
.id_table = cpu_table,
};
(this from linuxbios)
The __cpu_driver is passed to the linker
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 3:03 PM, Charles Forsyth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
speaking of higher levels of abstraction:
given some scientific code i've seen (before this, nothing to do with the
things
running on Blue Gene), i'd observe that fixing some of the algorithms used
(which
is
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 3:04 PM, erik quanstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, am I just out of date or is there a real reason for linker
sets?This question just came up in linuxbios v3 and I am wondering if
I am a stubborn old coot (likely) or if there really is merit to my
dislike of linker
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 3:17 PM, erik quanstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, am I just out of date or is there a real reason for linker
sets?This question just came up in linuxbios v3 and I am wondering if
I am a stubborn old coot (likely) or if there really is merit to my
dislike of
here is a thought:
the kernel does mmap for code/data. This is because we think of a file
as a segment of data that somehow maps well to a segment of memory.
You wouldn't execute code from a stream, now, would you?
Well, this: http://www.ambric.com/
has hardware channels. And you can
call from
On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 6:22 AM, Richard Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
has hardware channels. And you can
call from channel
and execute code being sent down a channel to you from another cpu.
...
it's a very interesting architecture, to say the least. For me anyway
the most novel thing I've
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 8:52 AM, Wendell xe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Seeking an alternative to vi and emacs, I've been giving Acme a try
(acme-sac, actually). After reading the articles and man pages and playing
with it for a few days, I'll admit I don't see how Acme could be even
remotely
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 9:59 AM, Eris Discordia
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A correction:
Mea culpa. UNIX systems apparently force processes to share a single network
stack,
gee how about that? Isn't it nice to acquire knowledge and *then* post?
but that can be changed:
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 9:39 AM, Eris Discordia
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Basically, a terminal should not hold _any_ information on its users. Where
does the security of not keeping authentication information on a so-called
terminal go when you _keep_ it on the terminal? But with multiple
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 10:36 AM, Eris Discordia
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it _that_ annoying to you? I could just keep silent if it is so, no
booting required.
goodness, it's not annoying. It's just a waste of breath, bandwidth,
and bytes. Why not go do some reading and stop wasting all
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 12:04 PM, erik quanstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can read and write the entire image using dd(1), irrespective of
geometry and I have used disksim to build an image using the second
geometry, but installing this on the flash has not made it possible to
boot a Plan 9
OK, I see this note and am sorry this is not working well for you. I
will try again this week to get this going.
It's harder now as I'm now on a 64-bit machine and 64-bit lguest is not there.
But I'll try to get you an answer.
Sorry
ron
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 4:23 PM, Alex Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's what I've done so far (maybe it's excessive list every single
step, but just in case...):
not at all!
1. Grab relevant files.
- Download 9lguestcpu.2.6.25.elf and RUNLGUEST from Ron's contrib directory
- Get
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 3:56 AM, erik quanstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I have gotten the lguest port working on the 2.6.25.0 kernel, it works
mighty fine here.
The load issue for me is only on plan9, on the host I can see with 'top'
that the lguest guest isn't consuming all the
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 7:52 AM, ron minnich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 3:56 AM, erik quanstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I have gotten the lguest port working on the 2.6.25.0 kernel, it works
mighty fine here.
The load issue for me is only on plan9, on the host I
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 7:59 AM, erik quanstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it any event, fixing timesync properly is likely to fix the excessive
load problem.
good to know. I probably jumped to the wrong conclusion.
ron
I just realized that even one timesync is too much. You should not
run any at all. The hardware clock is set from Linux and I don't even
allow it to be set. It makes no sense to do that.
So don't let timesync run.
thanks
ron
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 11:44 PM, John Soros [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, still, it would be great to know how to set the time, as my time is way
off (by more than 4 hours).
What's the time on your host (Linux) look like? Are you sure it's not
a time zone setup issue?
Is it always four hours?
1 - 100 of 999 matches
Mail list logo
