http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4588
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|possible 2.6.8-2.6.9|AE_TIME - Battery not
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3022
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-03 20:14 ---
I manually patched the Debian 2.6.14-7 source with
radeonfb_d2_suspend-20051205.patch and can report that it works on my T42
2373-JTU. With the patched radeonfb module
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5793
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-04 09:18 ---
One problem more after wake with x-server ewery thing working but NIC not
working.
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5825
Summary: soft lockup detected on CPU#0
Kernel Version: 2.6.15
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Owner: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Submitter: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Most recent kernel where this bug did not
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5825
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-04 09:29 ---
Created an attachment (id=6930)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=6930action=view)
cpuinfo
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5793
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Kernel Version|2.6.15-rc7 |2.6.15
--- You are receiving this
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5825
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||acpi-
|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5793
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-04 17:26 ---
So only NIC can't work after resume, right? Could you please give me
the 'lspci -vv' output after resume. Thanks!
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-04 17:41 ---
Created an attachment (id=6935)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=6935action=view)
debug
So both your issues are s3 stress test failed. Attached patch
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5832
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED],
|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5084
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Kernel Version|2.6.10 up to current 2.6.14 |2.6.10 up to current 2.6.15
---
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5084
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- You are
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5813
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-05 15:51 ---
I have a similar error, but other Adresses.
The occured Error results in a _very_ slow loading of X.
dmesg:
PCI: Using ACPI for IRQ routing
PCI: If a device doesn't
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5486
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- You are
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4319
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-06 11:39 ---
I tried with kernel 2.6.15 the problem exists.
But I observed something, the latency settings under windows and linux are
different:
- for atheros card under linux
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5844
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
OtherBugsDependingO||5845
nThis|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5728
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-07 05:16 ---
Created an attachment (id=6954)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=6954action=view)
madt
/usr/src/pmtools/acpidump/acpidump |
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5844
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-07 11:57 ---
Created an attachment (id=6960)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=6960action=view)
lspci sata only, after piix loaded
--- You are receiving this
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5844
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-07 12:03 ---
(From update of attachment 6959)
This configuration working goot.
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5849
Summary: Regression. Suspend is not working: Restarting
tasks...6 Strange, kedac not stopped
Kernel Version: 2.6.15-mm1 - 2.6.15-mm2
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Owner: [EMAIL
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5849
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-07 12:11 ---
Created an attachment (id=6963)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=6963action=view)
dmesg 2.6.15-mm2
--- You are receiving this mail because:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5351
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-07 16:52 ---
Yes, it did not get in to 2.6.15, it was a bit too late. But it will in 2.6.16
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5853
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-08 14:09 ---
Created an attachment (id=6971)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=6971action=view)
Output of acpidump
--- You are receiving this mail because:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5082
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-08 14:22 ---
Created an attachment (id=6972)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=6972action=view)
let the system settle down a bit first
This bug is really strange...
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5849
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-09 01:08 ---
It's actualy Bug 5793. After standby - resume is working, after mem - freaz
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug,
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5305
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-11 01:30 ---
This patch seems to fix the issues, before it, none of these events worked:
Removing the battery:
ac_adapter ADP0 0001
battery BAT0 0001
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5825
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Kernel Version|2.6.15 |2.6.15-mm3
--- You are receiving
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5872
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-11 17:18 ---
Created an attachment (id=6990)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=6990action=view)
lspci output
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5872
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-11 17:20 ---
Created an attachment (id=6992)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=6992action=view)
kernel config
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5793
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1551
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3558
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-15 18:43 ---
No driver for frequency and there is nothing in
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq, the laptop does not support cpu throlling.
The bug seems to be related to power
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5899
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-15 22:59 ---
nolapic noapic acpi=off
It's very wield processor module can be loaded with acpi=off. Can you double
check it?
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5888
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-15 23:39 ---
Can you please try 'standby' in the system? hopfully you can gather the full
log of 'standby'.
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5825
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-16 20:39 ---
I tried two systems here, never find such issue. Could you please try latest -
git tree?
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5825
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-17 05:42 ---
Created an attachment (id=7046)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=7046action=view)
disassm
If it's help you. Here is disassm from intel_i915_configure
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3927
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-17 12:26 ---
Please create a new bug for different issues, it makes it way too difficult
otherwise.
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5751
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4700
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Owner|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5396
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-17 18:54 ---
The patch Len mentioned just adds a new boot option just like reboot=c,b and
w,b. So you still need boot option, it can't make your system automically work.
One
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5825
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-17 23:26 ---
Created an attachment (id=7057)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=7057action=view)
dmesg with debug patch
--- You are receiving this mail because:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5825
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-17 23:41 ---
I will try memtest.
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5749
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #6839 is|0 |1
obsolete|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5749
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-18 00:09 ---
Created an attachment (id=7061)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=7061action=view)
hotkey sysfs support
hotkey sysfs support
--- You are receiving
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5051
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-18 00:58 ---
Brice,
Please confirm that the patch 4588 and my patch solved the problems of ac
adapter and battery.
Vladimir.
--- You are receiving this mail because:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5337
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5918
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-18 06:14 ---
Created an attachment (id=7063)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=7063action=view)
dmesg from a boot without nobody cared.
I made no changes to hard or
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5911
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #7049 is|0 |1
obsolete|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4791
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-18 06:27 ---
I guess BIOS writers just do not expect to have ACPI and USB legacy emulation
code active at the same time - USB legacy emulation is most useful at boot time
and in
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5911
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-18 06:48 ---
Also report if booting with acpi=off fixes it.
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5884
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-18 07:23 ---
I was mistaken, it does not actually power off.
It SEEMS as though it is powered off, but if I hit a MM key at the top a second
time, it reboots the machine.
---
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4588
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-18 10:09 ---
please see bug 5051
Regards, Brice
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4319
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-18 11:05 ---
on i386, noapicinterrupt doesn't exist as an option, but it will get parsed as
noapic. Is that what you intended?
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5911
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-18 12:40 ---
This machine has had this problems since it was built.
acpi=off does not fix it either...
I am guessing that the BIOS is doing something stupid, like leaving the last
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5174
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-18 14:03 ---
I can confirm this is fixed. I used Gentoo's gentoo-sources-2.6.15 kernel,
applied the acpica 20051216 patch from
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4791
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-18 14:58 ---
Just for the record, what USB controller(s) does your box have?
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4791
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-18 15:05 ---
lspci output:
00:1d.0 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801DB/DBL/DBM (ICH4/ICH4-L/ICH4-M)
USB UHCI Controller #1 (rev 02) (prog-if 00 [UHCI])
Subsystem: IBM
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5825
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-18 18:29 ---
Created an attachment (id=7068)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=7068action=view)
patch for time resume
I reproduced this issue with notsc. This might
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5051
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-18 22:39 ---
Brice, I wrote about linux-2.6.16-rc1-mm1 (MM1) but not about linux-2.6.16-rc1
So if you use linux-2.6.15 plus last patch in 4588 and patch from comment #9,
does the
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5825
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-18 23:25 ---
I get build problems.
LD .tmp_vmlinux1
arch/x86_64/kernel/built-in.o: In function `timer_resume':
time.c:(.text+0x5c75): undefined reference to
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5825
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-19 00:21 ---
Created an attachment (id=7069)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=7069action=view)
dmesg with fix patch
The patch is working.
Thank you!
--- You
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5825
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5671
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- You are
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5696
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||acpi_power-sleep-
|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5911
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Kernel Version|2.6.15.1|2.6.12.5-2.6.15.1
--- You are
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5671
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|high|normal
--- Additional Comments
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5051
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-19 07:04 ---
This patch '2.6.16-rc1-mm1' for linux-2.6.16-rc1 is located in the same side -
'kernel.org', see the bottom of kernel's list.
You can donwload
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5671
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-20 08:25 ---
I rebuilt the same kernel (2.6.14.3) without CONFIG_DETECT_SOFTLOCKUP. Now when
I boot without pci=routeirq, the only change is I don't get any output at all
when the
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5841
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5741
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Owner|acpi_config-|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5741
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-20 13:25 ---
Sorry for the delay. Just tested - yes acpi=noirq works too.
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5084
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- You are
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5040
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED
--- Additional Comments
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5930
Summary: 2.6.15 Serverworks OSB4/Supermicro 370DER 2nd cpu
doesn't do any work
Kernel Version: 2.6.15
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Owner: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Submitter:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5930
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-20 18:40 ---
Created an attachment (id=7085)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=7085action=view)
acpidump from affected system
dump made using acpidump
--- You
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5040
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-21 00:46 ---
i'll get my hand on this laptop next 10 days will test latest linus, latest
acpi.
and test any patch that i'm pointed too.
i'm confused which trace you need, but i'll
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5930
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- You are
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3927
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-21 06:46 ---
Would it be possible to get the timer-routing-1 patch introduced in #73
(http://www.firstfloor.org/~andi/timer-routing-1) rediffed against 2.6.16-rc1?
It has give me
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3712
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3927
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- You are
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5933
Summary: System will not boot on msi rs480m2 when either acpi or
apic is enabled
Kernel Version: 2.6.16-rc1
Status: NEW
Severity: high
Owner: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Submitter:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5933
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-21 11:45 ---
Created an attachment (id=7089)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=7089action=view)
lspci -vv output
--- You are receiving this mail because:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5933
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-21 11:52 ---
Created an attachment (id=7091)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=7091action=view)
./acpidump/acpidump -t DSDT -b -o DSDT;output of iasl -d DSDT
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5933
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-21 11:53 ---
Created an attachment (id=7092)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=7092action=view)
dmidecode output
--- You are receiving this mail because:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5933
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-21 12:07 ---
cat /proc/interrupts
CPU0
0: 22159 XT-PIC timer
1:122 XT-PIC i8042
2: 0 XT-PIC cascade
3:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5933
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-21 11:51 ---
Created an attachment (id=7090)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=7090action=view)
acpidump.out
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5933
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3022
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- You are
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3022
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-22 05:23 ---
The 20051205 can be applied cleanly also to vanilla kernel 2.6.15 and has been
included in the archck patchset. In my laptop (a compaq presario 2120EA with a
RADEON IGP
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5930
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- You are
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5930
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5930
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||acpi-
|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5938
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED],
|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5671
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-22 22:32 ---
Please try unload some drivers, see if it helps. Maybe some drivers are buggy.
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug,
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5930
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-23 02:39 ---
Not sure if it is required but it can do no harm: Probably a good idea to turn
on CONFIG_ACPI_DEBUG as well as applying that patch.
--- You are receiving this mail
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5671
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-23 05:25 ---
OK - removing snd-maestro3 seems to be the magic bullet. With only the
following:
nls_utf82241 0
video 16325 0
battery
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5930
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-23 04:49 ---
Created an attachment (id=7100)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=7100action=view)
dmesg for the buggy case
--- You are receiving this mail
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5872
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-23 06:30 ---
its the same in linux-2.6.16-rc1 kernel.
i have found, that kacpid starts to behave this way after initializing
lm_sensors
via sensors -s command in initscripts.
the
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5872
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-23 06:35 ---
Created an attachment (id=7102)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=7102action=view)
output of acpidump
--- You are receiving this mail because:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5728
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |REJECTED
Resolution|
1 - 100 of 18929 matches
Mail list logo
