On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Anticept . antic...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 7:01 AM, Tzafrir Cohen tzaf...@cohens.org.il wrote:
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 06:19:49AM -0400, Anticept . wrote:
Fixed that symlink too, unfortunately this did not help.
Module-assistant appears
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Adam Hardy adam@cyberspaceroad.com wrote:
I have a bizarre problem with the server at 208.245.107.9, which is an
internet broker whose server keeps disconnecting when making data requests.
Their support is blaming the problem on me.
208.245.107.9 is used
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 5:31 PM, Ron Johnson ron.l.john...@cox.net wrote:
On 10/16/2010 03:20 PM, Anticept . wrote:
[snip]
Use ... google DNS.
So instead of just knowing everything you search, and all of your email,
they also know everywhere you surf?
--
Seek truth from facts.
I'm
was this?
-Anticept
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktik2zowouap=8sp9iwuhdx91wdcdeolcbrj9x...@mail.gmail.com
[...]
So here it appears that root is sda6!
It is. tune2fs -l /dev/sda6 should work fine.
What other way is there other than df to find where the root fs is mounted?
Not sure, but if you just remember you are using sata drives, and they
show as sd[x][#]. Maybe fstab will help?
-Anticept
(if any
people have done, only worry about yourself. I don't like some
of them either, but it's not my place to judge them based on my
religion. That is reserved for the big man upstairs.
-Best regards
-Anticept
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 4:12 PM, Paul Richards paul.richa...@gmail.com wrote:
Everything else like the new boot scripts, upgrade to grub2, new
kernel, etc are working great.
--
Paul Richards
@pauldoo
Don't forget the aptitude purge ~c to clean out all those leftover,
and possibly
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 3:09 PM, T o n g mlist4sunt...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi,
I used to use either apt-get or aptitude to install packages. Is it OK to
do so?
I read [1] that it is not a good idea.
Please comment.
thanks
[1]
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 3:21 PM, T o n g mlist4sunt...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Wed, 25 Aug 2010 15:16:44 -0400, Anticept . wrote:
I used to use either apt-get or aptitude to install packages. Is it OK
to do so?
I read [1] that it is not a good idea. Please comment.
. . .
There is no reason
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 7:01 AM, Tzafrir Cohen tzaf...@cohens.org.il wrote:
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 06:19:49AM -0400, Anticept . wrote:
Fixed that symlink too, unfortunately this did not help.
Module-assistant appears to be malfunctioning as well. After it fails
to find the kernel headers
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 7:22 PM, Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com wrote:
Jochen Schulz wrote:
Bob Proulx:
No, they couldn't. :) Windows (since at least XP) doesn't allow
formatting disks larger than (IIRC) 32GB with the FAT filesystem. It's
either NTFS or… NTFS.
So... FAT32 supports up to 8T in
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 4:03 AM, Angus Hedger demide...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey there,
I would check the /lib/modules/kernel version/build symlink
Make sure its pointing to /usr/src/linux-headers-kernel version
I have had some problems with stuff not being about to find k-headers
due to
I'm using a custom built kernel that I've created with make-kpkg using
the debian kernel source, and I've also created and installed
kernel-source and kernel-headers with that same utility.
I need to rebuild the alsa modules to include the module called
aloop, which isn't included in the stock
13 matches
Mail list logo
