Re: [IE] Re: [grpc-io] Java 8 end of life for gRPC ?

2022-02-22 Thread 'Russell Shaw' via grpc.io
So if we meet our migration target to move application for Z/OS to GCP this year, then I think we should be fine Either way, it sound like Java 8 pubsub client will still be fine in the meantime *Russell Shaw* Software Engineer - Career Acro Database Support Equifax Inc. O 470-750-2979 Ext

[grpc-io] Java 8 end of life for gRPC ?

2022-01-28 Thread 'Russell Shaw' via grpc.io
? Is there any Google Cloud Platform information on "no longer supported" versions of Pubsub / grpcjava jars / cloud-boms? I can't find it mentioned. Cheers, Russell *Russell Shaw* Software Engineer - Career Acro Database Support Equifax Inc. O 470-750-2979 Ext.32444 C 678-243-857

Re: static class member as interrupt handler works, but not if class is templated

2021-04-10 Thread Russell Shaw
On 11/4/21 8:36 am, Trampas Stern wrote: Actually C++ is not slower or more bloat than C, depending on the features used. For example I do not use RTTI or exceptions, so that makes it about the same as C for size. Yes you have to turn these features off in your compiler (-fno-rtti,

Re: Future plans for Autotools

2021-01-21 Thread Russell Shaw
On 21/1/21 9:15 am, Zack Weinberg wrote: Now we've all had a while to recover from the long-awaited Autoconf 2.70 release, I'd like to start a conversation about where the Autotools in general might be going in the future. Clearly any future development depends on finding people who will do the

Re: determine base type of a typedef

2020-10-23 Thread Russell Shaw
On 23/10/20 6:06 pm, Russell Shaw wrote: On 23/10/20 5:54 pm, Anatoli wrote: Russell, Thanks for your suggestion. The problem is, as I mentioned in the initial post, on amd64 sizeof(time_t) is always 8 bytes, as well as long and long long, so sizeof(time_t) == sizeof(long int) == sizeof(long

Re: determine base type of a typedef

2020-10-23 Thread Russell Shaw
On 23/10/20 6:06 pm, Russell Shaw wrote: On 23/10/20 5:54 pm, Anatoli wrote: Russell, Thanks for your suggestion. The problem is, as I mentioned in the initial post, on amd64 sizeof(time_t) is always 8 bytes, as well as long and long long, so sizeof(time_t) == sizeof(long int) == sizeof(long

Re: determine base type of a typedef

2020-10-23 Thread Russell Shaw
On 23/10/20 5:54 pm, Anatoli wrote: Russell, Thanks for your suggestion. The problem is, as I mentioned in the initial post, on amd64 sizeof(time_t) is always 8 bytes, as well as long and long long, so sizeof(time_t) == sizeof(long int) == sizeof(long long int). I've actually tried the

Re: determine base type of a typedef

2020-10-22 Thread Russell Shaw
On 23/10/20 9:23 am, Anatoli wrote: Hi All, Is there a way to determine with autoconf what's the base type of a typedef? I'm trying to accomplish the following: There are standard types time_t, off_t, size_t and similar that are defined differently on different platforms/OS. For example,

Re: How to change the shebang in 'configure' to require Bash

2018-03-20 Thread Russell Shaw
On 20/03/18 22:53, Russell Shaw wrote: On 20/03/18 21:07, R. Diez wrote: ... Requiring a POSIX shell in the next version is an improvement, but POSIX is too limiting to really help. It is 2018. No wonder so many people want to ditch Autoconf! Autoconf is hard to learn because becoming

Re: How to change the shebang in 'configure' to require Bash

2018-03-20 Thread Russell Shaw
On 20/03/18 21:07, R. Diez wrote: ... Requiring a POSIX shell in the next version is an improvement, but POSIX is too limiting to really help. It is 2018. No wonder so many people want to ditch Autoconf! Autoconf is hard to learn because becoming properly familiar with shell programming

Re: Ggradebook; request for assistance

2017-02-11 Thread Russell Shaw
On 12/02/17 01:28, Norbert de Jonge wrote: Hi, The following is my reply to someone who recently sent me an e-mail with a modified Ggradebook 0.92 that includes autoconf/automake. First of all, I sincerely appreciate you looking into it. What you've created is not quite what I'm looking for.

Re: Autoconf and a bare-metal host with no C library

2016-10-13 Thread Russell Shaw
On 13/10/16 13:11, Luca Saiu wrote: ... > So, what I'm asking you is: does a clean solution exist, or compiling > without a runtime library is just not supported by the Autotools? It > sounds weird to say that for configuring you need a cross-compiler with > support for a runtime that will

"inline" using a variable

2016-10-01 Thread Russell Shaw
Hi, When i "configured" binutils in a directory separate to the source directory, it generates a 11500 line Makefile containing the following fragment. Down the bottom it does: $(MAKE) $(RECURSE_FLAGS_TO_PASS) all-stage1; but "all-stage1" is not in the Makefile. I think it's got something

m4_divert_text

2016-09-14 Thread Russell Shaw
Hi, In binutils/configure.ac there is: m4_divert_text([PARSE_ARGS], [case $srcdir in *" "*) m4_pushdef([AS_MESSAGE_LOG_FD], [])dnl AC_MSG_ERROR([path to source, $srcdir, contains spaces]) m4_popdef([AS_MESSAGE_LOG_FD])dnl ;; esac ac_subdirs_all=`cd $srcdir && echo */configure | sed

XPP

2015-01-11 Thread Russell Shaw
Hi, I use the xpp printing panel which has always been a bit buggy, and recently it has become so buggy and crashing as to be unuseable. It is unmaintained upstream, and also an orphaned package. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?dist=unstable;package=xpp#_0_3_4

Re: Automate desired resolution at login

2014-01-19 Thread Russell Shaw
On 19/01/14 07:11, j...@askur.org wrote: When I log into X I seem to have the wrong resolution (My screen: vga 19LCD envision rated at 1440x900). I am able to get around that by typing the following: xrandr --newmode 1440x900_60.00 106.50 1440 1528 1672 1904 900 903 909 934 -hsync +vsync

Re: [avr-gcc-list] How to initialize an array of struct?

2013-12-14 Thread Russell Shaw
On 15/12/13 17:20, dfx wrote: Hi, After spending more than one day to create an array of struct I have come to this code: struct Lamp { uint8_t highAddress [9] ; uint8_t lowAddress [9] ; uint8_t onoff ; uint8_t active ; uint8_t power; uint8_t brightness ; uint8_t

Re: [avr-gcc-list] How to initialize an array of struct?

2013-12-14 Thread Russell Shaw
On 15/12/13 17:20, dfx wrote: Hi, After spending more than one day to create an array of struct I have come to this code: struct Lamp { uint8_t highAddress [9] ; uint8_t lowAddress [9] ; uint8_t onoff ; uint8_t active ; uint8_t power; uint8_t brightness ; uint8_t

Re: XRANDR outputs

2013-10-15 Thread Russell Shaw
On 16/10/13 08:58, Alex Deucher wrote: On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 2:53 AM, Russell Shaw rjs...@netspace.net.au wrote: Hi, After a system upgrade, xrandr no longer reports two monitors connected to the video card. I get: xrandr: Failed to get size of gamma for output default Screen 0: minimum 640

[Remind-Fans] 5th friday of month

2013-07-31 Thread Russell Shaw
Hi, In a Remind file (test) i have: REM FRI 29 MSG 5th-friday when i run remind -c test, i get an entry on the 2nd and 30th. (today is thursday 1-aug-2013) ___ Remind-fans mailing list Remind-fans@lists.roaringpenguin.com

Re: [free-software-melb] CuBox

2013-06-28 Thread Russell Shaw
On 28/06/13 18:27, Glenn McIntosh wrote: On 28/06/13 16:59, Sven@GMX wrote: But in order to programm the Embedded Pi you need to install CoocoxIDE, which is free to use but neither Open Source nor does it run on an Open Source system such as Linux. Unfortunately this creeping lock-in is all

Re: [ANNOUNCE] libXi 1.4.99.1

2011-11-09 Thread Russell Shaw
On 09/11/11 12:16, Peter Hutterer wrote: A month late but I just noticed that I never sent an announcement out for this. libXi is the first snapshot for XI 2.1 support. At this point I consider it unlikely that any major protocol changes will happen to the smooth scrolling support. If you're

Re: seprate window management component

2011-09-14 Thread Russell Shaw
On 15/09/11 04:33, Michal Suchanek wrote: On 14 September 2011 20:26, Bill Spitzakspit...@gmail.com wrote: I think the idea is that what you are calling the window manager is in fact a library running in the client process and memory space. It would probably be part of the toolkit. Which is

Re: gEDA-user: pcjc2 tessellation

2011-05-29 Thread Russell Shaw
On 29/05/11 23:30, Peter Clifton wrote: On Sun, 2011-05-29 at 11:37 +1000, Russell Shaw wrote: Hi, In _borast_bentley_ottmann_tessellate_bo_edges() which is from _cairo_bentley_ottmann_tessellate_bo_edges(), i see you deleted case CAIRO_BO_EVENT_TYPE_INTERSECTION: What effect does this have

Re: gEDA-user: pcjc2 tessellation

2011-05-28 Thread Russell Shaw
On 16/05/11 22:59, Russell Shaw wrote: On 16/05/11 19:26, Peter Clifton wrote: On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 15:54 +1000, Russell Shaw wrote: From pcjc2/src/borast/borast-bentley-ottmann.c, i used some functions to make a small test program to see how bo_contour_to_traps() works. The code is mostly

Re: gEDA-user: pcjc2 tessellation

2011-05-28 Thread Russell Shaw
On 29/05/11 00:46, Russell Shaw wrote: On 16/05/11 22:59, Russell Shaw wrote: On 16/05/11 19:26, Peter Clifton wrote: On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 15:54 +1000, Russell Shaw wrote: From pcjc2/src/borast/borast-bentley-ottmann.c, i used some functions to make a small test program to see how

Re: gEDA-user: Reinventing the wheel

2011-05-18 Thread Russell Shaw
On 17/05/2011, John Dotyj...@noqsi.com wrote: On May 17, 2011, at 9:56 AM, Russell Shaw wrote: Most guis hide what they do. I believe in them showing the commands they send internally as a script would (or atleast have the option to show that) so the user can paste the commands

Re: gEDA-user: Reinventing the wheel

2011-05-18 Thread Russell Shaw
On 18/05/11 12:28, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote: Russell Shaw wrote: The problem with KiCAD is 1) C++, 2) Qt. The problems I encountered with gnetlist were 1) scheme I think Scheme could be made much more attractive in geda if it was adequately explained in documentation or a tutorial. I

Re: gEDA-user: Reinventing the wheel

2011-05-18 Thread Russell Shaw
On 19/05/11 02:13, DJ Delorie wrote: I'm a gtk hater, and am open to new widget toolkit user interface paradigms, So, you build pcb with --enable-gui=lesstif ? ;-) I do it with gtk whenever i want to poke at it. I know how gtk works, but it's far too convoluted and burdensome for

Re: gEDA-user: Reinventing the wheel

2011-05-17 Thread Russell Shaw
On 17/05/11 02:44, DJ Delorie wrote: I've always been interested in CAD programs and thought of making a schematic/pcb one from scratch. I've never truly understood why people would rewrite a (potentially) huge application set just because. Why not start with the existing tools and just

Re: gEDA-user: Reinventing the wheel

2011-05-17 Thread Russell Shaw
On 17/05/11 22:31, Stefan Salewski wrote: On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 20:36 +1000, Russell Shaw wrote: On 17/05/11 02:44, DJ Delorie wrote: Hi, A schematic/pcb editor is not huge unless it's done in an inelegant way. A very first task i would do is create a decent gui for drawing the symbol

Re: gEDA-user: Reinventing the wheel

2011-05-17 Thread Russell Shaw
On 17/05/11 22:40, John Doty wrote: On May 17, 2011, at 4:36 AM, Russell Shaw wrote: Hi, A schematic/pcb editor is not huge unless it's done in an inelegant way. A very first task i would do is create a decent gui for drawing the symbol and footprint in the schematic/pcb library, and make

Re: gEDA-user: Reinventing the wheel

2011-05-17 Thread Russell Shaw
On 17/05/11 23:43, Stefan Salewski wrote: On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 23:35 +1000, Russell Shaw wrote: I was expert at using high-end HP DCS/PCDS on unix boxes 20 years ago before it got discontinued, and a few other cad systems since then. A very first task i would do is create a decent gui

Re: gEDA-user: Reinventing the wheel

2011-05-17 Thread Russell Shaw
On 18/05/11 00:15, John Doty wrote: On May 17, 2011, at 7:45 AM, Russell Shaw wrote: A well-stocked workshop is nothing more than a multitool workshop. With that attitude, you'll botch the job. There's no reason why a schematic and pcb editor can't have tight coupling and still interact

Re: gEDA-user: Reinventing the wheel

2011-05-17 Thread Russell Shaw
On 18/05/11 00:30, Stefan Salewski wrote: On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 23:59 +1000, Russell Shaw wrote: Instead of blindly reinventing the wheel, i always look in detail at what currently exists. Maybe KiCAD is a better starting point for you? Written in C++ with wxWidgets, it is available

Re: gEDA-user: Reinventing the wheel

2011-05-17 Thread Russell Shaw
On 18/05/11 00:30, Stefan Salewski wrote: On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 23:59 +1000, Russell Shaw wrote: Instead of blindly reinventing the wheel, i always look in detail at what currently exists. Maybe KiCAD is a better starting point for you? Written in C++ with wxWidgets, it is available

Re: gEDA-user: Reinventing the wheel

2011-05-17 Thread Russell Shaw
On 18/05/11 00:30, Stefan Salewski wrote: On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 23:59 +1000, Russell Shaw wrote: Instead of blindly reinventing the wheel, i always look in detail at what currently exists. Maybe KiCAD is a better starting point for you? Written in C++ with wxWidgets, it is available

Re: gEDA-user: Reinventing the wheel

2011-05-17 Thread Russell Shaw
On 18/05/11 01:41, John Doty wrote: On May 17, 2011, at 9:06 AM, Russell Shaw wrote: It seems like too much redundancy to have two projects with similar uses (which i wouldn't like), and i don't like forking either. But your vision is an integrated tool, while gEDA is a toolkit. I'm

Re: gEDA-user: Unsubscribing from the list

2011-05-17 Thread Russell Shaw
On 18/05/11 02:01, Peter TB Brett wrote: Hi folks, It's no longer a worthwhile use of my time to monitor this list, due to the excessively low signal-to-noise ratio. I'm therefore unsubscribing from it for the time being. I will continue to monitor the gEDA-bug and gEDA-dev mailing lists. If

gEDA-user: pcjc2 tessellation

2011-05-16 Thread Russell Shaw
On 11/09/10 07:59, Peter Clifton wrote: On Fri, 2010-09-10 at 14:16 -0400, Windell H. Oskay wrote: On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 01:31:48AM +0100, Peter Clifton wrote: PS.. have you tried any of the GL stuff? http://www2.eng.cam.ac.uk/~pcjc2/geda/trans_poly.png

Re: gEDA-user: pcjc2 tessellation

2011-05-16 Thread Russell Shaw
On 16/05/11 19:26, Peter Clifton wrote: On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 15:54 +1000, Russell Shaw wrote: From pcjc2/src/borast/borast-bentley-ottmann.c, i used some functions to make a small test program to see how bo_contour_to_traps() works. The code is mostly stolen from cairo, then stripped

Re: gEDA-user: pcjc2 tessellation

2011-05-16 Thread Russell Shaw
On 16/05/11 19:26, Peter Clifton wrote: On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 15:54 +1000, Russell Shaw wrote: From pcjc2/src/borast/borast-bentley-ottmann.c, i used some functions to make a small test program to see how bo_contour_to_traps() works. The code is mostly stolen from cairo, then stripped

Re: client side decorations

2011-05-11 Thread Russell Shaw
On 11/05/11 18:55, Michal Suchanek wrote: On 10 May 2011 05:46, Russell Shawrjs...@netspace.net.au wrote: On 10/05/11 07:29, Daniel wrote: El dg 08 de 05 de 2011 a les 09:47 -0700, en/na Bill Spitzak va escriure: Though it is possible, I don't like the idea of clients sending hints about

Re: client side decorations

2011-05-06 Thread Russell Shaw
On 06/05/11 10:18, Bill Spitzak wrote: I believe client-side decorations are an absolute must. The amount of code necessary for an application to use an async protocol to describe how the window border should appear is greatly larger than that needed to just draw and handle events in the window

Re: client side decorations

2011-05-06 Thread Russell Shaw
On 06/05/11 10:18, Bill Spitzak wrote: I believe client-side decorations are an absolute must. The amount of code necessary for an application to use an async protocol to describe how the window border should appear is greatly larger than that needed to just draw and handle events in the window

Re: debbugs, and a FAQ, for Autotools

2011-02-19 Thread Russell Shaw
On 20/02/11 06:10, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Hi Russell, * Russell Shaw wrote on Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 12:00:14AM CET: I'd ask more about how the internals of ./configure and autoconf works. Can you formulate more specific questions? And questions on how to make bison get handled without being

Re: debbugs, and a FAQ, for Autotools

2011-02-14 Thread Russell Shaw
On 14/02/11 05:12, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: [ Cross post; Reply-To and Mail-Followup-To set. Please followup to the automake list only, to avoid excessive spammage. Thank you. ] Hello everyone, I've been advertising debbugs before, I think we should be a good example. So, two proposals:

Re: configure -C by default?

2011-02-07 Thread Russell Shaw
On 07/02/11 23:45, Brian Gough wrote: At Sun, 6 Feb 2011 23:11:43 +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Back then, the consensus was to not make it the default because that was deemed too dangerous for users. Various reports are cited, and also the problem is mentioned that such kinds of failures tend

Bison

2011-01-11 Thread Russell Shaw
Hi, On debian, there is /usr/bin/bison, and /usr/bin/bison.yacc just does: exec '/usr/bin/bison' -y $@ How can i get autoconf to use bison? The problem with yacc is that you can't rename the output files and always get: y.tab.h y.tab.c Is there a way i can get yacc to give better output

Re: Bison

2011-01-11 Thread Russell Shaw
On 12/01/11 06:24, John Calcote wrote: On 01/11/2011 04:31 AM, Russell Shaw wrote: Hi, On debian, there is /usr/bin/bison, and /usr/bin/bison.yacc just does: exec '/usr/bin/bison' -y $@ How can i get autoconf to use bison? The problem with yacc is that you can't rename the output files

Re: gEDA-user: gEDA Wikibook ?

2010-12-25 Thread Russell Shaw
On 26/12/10 01:13, Karl Hammar wrote: Russell: ... I don't do latex, because not one sane person on any planet can explain Tex. (yes, i've read all the tex manuals and have written compiler tools) Strange wording. I've not read the tex manuals and I can still produce and be fluent with Latex.

Re: gEDA-user: Small patch to aid use of lib dmalloc

2010-12-06 Thread Russell Shaw
On 07/12/10 11:55, Peter Clifton wrote: On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 00:48 +, Peter Clifton wrote: On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 10:04 +1100, Stephen Ecob wrote: Dropping the (a) ? (a) : 1 foolishness would be cleaner, but could expose latent bugs in the 71 callers of the mymem allocators. I'm happy to

Re: default -g ??!?

2010-11-20 Thread Russell Shaw
On 20/11/10 06:10, MK wrote: I have a FOSS project distributed by debian, and for quite I've been using this in the Makefile.am under install-data-am: -strip --strip-all $(bindir)/executable Since I could not find a way to prevent the project being built -g, and there is no need for this.

Re: gEDA-user: STEP Format? [WAS: Re: PCB+GL+3D Packages??]

2010-11-19 Thread Russell Shaw
On 20/11/10 10:02, Peter Clifton wrote: On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 13:06 -0800, Colin D Bennett wrote: That suits me just fine.. OpenGL _likes_ rendering triangles, and any other geometry primitives are extra work to implement ;) But wouldn't support for higher-level shapes be superior to

Re: gEDA-user: STEP Format? [WAS: Re: PCB+GL+3D Packages??]

2010-11-19 Thread Russell Shaw
On 20/11/10 11:43, kai-martin knaak wrote: John Griessen wrote: STL seems to work fine for those shapes - your tool just chooses triangles that are long and skinny to accurately model the side of a cylinder for instance. ... and the file size explodes. If the wires of thru hole components

Re: [openobex-users] Nokia 6120

2010-11-16 Thread Russell Shaw
On 16/11/10 20:06, Hendrik Sattler wrote: obexftp -H -U none -u 1 -X sudo obexftp -H -U none -u 1 -X Suppressing FBS. obexftp_open() obexftp_connect_src() Connecting...obexftp_connect_src() obexftp_connect_src() USB 1 cli_sync_request() \obexftp_sync() obexftp_sync() OBEX_HandleInput = 0

Re: [openobex-users] Nokia 6120

2010-11-15 Thread Russell Shaw
. I guess the xml from the phone is somewhat non-standard. I'd be great if you could capture the output -- compile ObexFTP with debug enabled and just list/get some directories. Am 12.11.2010 um 17:26 schrieb Russell Shaw: When i mount the 6120 (not 2162), i get a heap of question-marks: sudo

Re: [openobex-users] Nokia 6120

2010-11-14 Thread Russell Shaw
On 14/11/10 21:25, Russell Shaw wrote: On 13/11/10 23:56, Christian Zuckschwerdt wrote: Russel, just remove doc from Makefile.am, then run autoreconf. Or even simpler touch doc/obexftp.1. Am 13.11.2010 um 03:34 schrieb Russell Shaw: I got obexftp from git. I get a doc error: ./configure

Re: [openobex-users] Nokia 6120

2010-11-14 Thread Russell Shaw
On 13/11/10 23:56, Christian Zuckschwerdt wrote: Russel, just remove doc from Makefile.am, then run autoreconf. Or even simpler touch doc/obexftp.1. Am 13.11.2010 um 03:34 schrieb Russell Shaw: I got obexftp from git. I get a doc error: ./configure CFLAGS=-DOBEXFTP_DEBUG=5 -g -O0 make[2

Re: builddir

2010-11-14 Thread Russell Shaw
On 15/11/10 01:10, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Hello Russell, * Russell Shaw wrote on Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 02:49:07AM CET: In a Makefile.in generated by automake 1.9.6, it defines top_builddir ok, but builddir is used but not defined in there. This causes problems, because the automake manual says

builddir

2010-11-13 Thread Russell Shaw
Hi, In a Makefile.in generated by automake 1.9.6, it defines top_builddir ok, but builddir is used but not defined in there. This causes problems, because the automake manual says: — Variable: builddir Rigorously equal to ‘.’. Added for symmetry only.

[openobex-users] Nokia 2162

2010-11-12 Thread Russell Shaw
Hi, When i mount the 2162, i get a heap of question-marks: sudo obexfs -t /dev/Nokia -u 1 /phone russ...@main~: ls -l / ls: cannot access /phone: Permission denied total 116 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Nov 3 23:05 bin drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 Nov 12 18:26 boot ... d? ? ?

[openobex-users] Nokia 6120

2010-11-12 Thread Russell Shaw
Hi, When i mount the 6120 (not 2162), i get a heap of question-marks: sudo obexfs -t /dev/Nokia -u 1 /phone russ...@main~: ls -l / ls: cannot access /phone: Permission denied total 116 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Nov 3 23:05 bin drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 Nov 12 18:26 boot ...

Re: [Mesa-dev] Dri api

2010-11-10 Thread Russell Shaw
On 11/11/10 01:36, Jerome Glisse wrote: On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 2:36 AM, Russell Shawrjs...@netspace.net.au wrote: Hi, I compiled mesa from sources. In mesa/src/driclient/src/XF86dri.c, if i use the api to make a drawable, how can i find the buffer pixel format? See my other reply on the

Dri2 buffer format

2010-11-08 Thread Russell Shaw
Hi, How should the format of a DRI2 buffer be determined? http://www.x.org/releases/current/doc/dri2proto/dri2proto.txt DRI2ATTACH_FORMAT { attachment: CARD32 format: CARD32 } The DRI2ATTACH_FORMAT describes an attachment and the associated format. 'attachment'

[Mesa-dev] X Dri

2010-11-08 Thread Russell Shaw
Hi, How should the format of a DRI2 buffer be determined? http://www.x.org/releases/current/doc/dri2proto/dri2proto.txt DRI2ATTACH_FORMAT { attachment: CARD32 format: CARD32 } The DRI2ATTACH_FORMAT describes an attachment and the associated format. 'attachment'

Dri2 buffer format

2010-11-08 Thread Russell Shaw
Hi, How should the format of a DRI2 buffer be determined? http://www.x.org/releases/current/doc/dri2proto/dri2proto.txt DRI2ATTACH_FORMAT { attachment: CARD32 format: CARD32 } The DRI2ATTACH_FORMAT describes an attachment and the associated format.

Re: XInput

2010-11-04 Thread Russell Shaw
On 05/11/10 10:21, Peter Hutterer wrote: On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 10:35:29PM +1100, Russell Shaw wrote: In XInput2, when i get a XI_HierarchyChanged event after plugging in another mouse, is there a way to get a unique identifier for each device such as a brand and model number? no, the device

Re: Slow Radeon on upgrade

2010-11-03 Thread Russell Shaw
Justin P. Mattock wrote: On 11/02/2010 10:42 PM, Russell Shaw wrote: I commented out all of xorg.conf, but it didn't fix it. maybe try the ati driver instead of the radeonhd? Hi, I messed around with xorg.conf settings and tried reinstalling the old driver and xorg-core resulting

Re: Slow Radeon on upgrade

2010-11-02 Thread Russell Shaw
I commented out all of xorg.conf, but it didn't fix it. ___ xorg@lists.freedesktop.org: X.Org support Archives: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg Info: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg Your subscription address:

Re: How to properly use XGrabKey to get a program hotkey

2010-10-27 Thread Russell Shaw
cheshirekow wrote: Hello, My goal is to have a program that sleeps in the background but can be activated by the user via some hotkey. From digging around the Xlib manual and the Xlib O'reilly manual, I gather that the correct way to to this is with XGrabKey. However my understanding of the

Re: gEDA-user: new footprint guidelines

2010-10-06 Thread Russell Shaw
John Doty wrote: On Oct 1, 2010, at 3:55 PM, Rick Collins wrote: Oh, I almost forgot, NEVER ask a PhD anything to design PCBs. What the heck are you thinking??? Speaking as a physicist, let me comment. 1. Learning to do a variety of engineering tasks is an important part of an experimental

Re: AC_CACHE_CHECK

2010-09-05 Thread Russell Shaw
Thomas Dickey wrote: On Sun, 5 Sep 2010, Russell Shaw wrote: Hi, When should AC_CACHE_CHECK be used? Whenever the user uninstalls something, wouldn't the cache become invalid? ...only if the user happened to uninstall something during the configure process. After that, AC_CACHE_CHECK

AC_CACHE_CHECK

2010-09-04 Thread Russell Shaw
Hi, When should AC_CACHE_CHECK be used? Whenever the user uninstalls something, wouldn't the cache become invalid? ___ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf

Re: gEDA-user: wishful UI

2010-08-05 Thread Russell Shaw
Andrew Poelstra wrote: I've been learning the code base and testing out new ideas, and it looks like I'll have to change the base HID code to support layer groups. So there's some more design work to run by you guys before I can do any real work: My vision is this: the current drawing area will

Re: Autotools book published

2010-07-26 Thread Russell Shaw
John Calcote wrote: Hi all. Just a quick note to let you all know that my Autotools book has been published (finally!) by No Starch Press: http://nostarch.com/autotools.htm I apologize in advance for the apparent self-promoting tone of this message but I know there are folks out there

Re: desktop schemas review [was: Re: GSettings migration status]

2010-07-05 Thread Russell Shaw
Alexander Larsson wrote: On Sat, 2010-07-03 at 13:25 -0400, Ryan Lortie wrote: On Sat, 2010-07-03 at 13:37 +0200, Christian Persch wrote: This is a common error. Filenames need to be stored as ay and *NOT* s (since s is UTF-8). (I think this needs some enhancement in glib-compile-schemas to be

Re: Fullscreen windows - weird behaviour

2010-05-18 Thread Russell Shaw
Andreas Falkenhahn wrote: Andreas Falkenhahn wrote: Hi, I have the following setup: ... Anybody got a clue what's going on there? You could add test code that uses XQueryTree() to find out why. http://tronche.com/gui/x/xlib/window-information/XQueryTree.html Hmm, I'm not sure if this

Re: gEDA-user: A little puzzled about the purpose of gschem

2010-04-29 Thread Russell Shaw
Gene Heskett wrote: On Wednesday 28 April 2010, Dave McGuire wrote: On Apr 28, 2010, at 3:40 PM, John Doty wrote: Well, you started out complaining about a 741 model. I'd call that a very rare, obsolete part: I haven't actually seen one in a circuit in over 30 years. I guess it's still in

Re: Building prog first

2010-03-23 Thread Russell Shaw
Steffen Dettmer wrote: On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 4:44 PM, Reuben Thomas r...@sc3d.org wrote: Not true. automake does not have explicit support for building programs with the host compiler when cross-compiling, but I have done this successfully in the past when I needed precisely to build a

Re: Building prog first

2010-03-22 Thread Russell Shaw
Steffen Dettmer wrote: * On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: noinst_PROGRAMS = unimain unimain_SOURCES = unimain.c unidata.tab.c: unimain$(EXEEXT) /usr/share/unicode/UnicodeData.txt ./unimain$(EXEEXT) $ $@ BTW, execution of built programs like this makes your

Building prog first

2010-03-21 Thread Russell Shaw
Hi, I want the unimain program built first, then use it to generate unidata.tab.c, which is then compiled and linked into librunicode.la bin_PROGRAMS = unimain unimain_SOURCES = unimain.c lib_LTLIBRARIES = librunicode.la librunicode_la_SOURCES = runicode.c runicode.h

Re: Building prog first

2010-03-21 Thread Russell Shaw
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Hello Russell, * Russell Shaw wrote on Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 07:06:00AM CET: I want the unimain program built first, then use it to generate unidata.tab.c, which is then compiled and linked into librunicode.la bin_PROGRAMS = unimain unimain_SOURCES = unimain.c

Re: Building prog first

2010-03-21 Thread Russell Shaw
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: * Russell Shaw wrote on Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 09:26:44AM CET: Ralf Wildenhues wrote: * Russell Shaw wrote on Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 07:06:00AM CET: bin_PROGRAMS = unimain unimain_SOURCES = unimain.c unidata.tab.c: unimain$(EXEEXT) /usr/share/unicode/UnicodeData.txt

Re: Building prog first

2010-03-21 Thread Russell Shaw
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: * Russell Shaw wrote on Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 11:18:03AM CET: Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Use noinst_PROGRAMS instead of bin_PROGRAMS. Be encouraged to read the fine manual. But it is somewhat big, and i had already searched through the online one a lot first

Re: Building prog first

2010-03-21 Thread Russell Shaw
Alfred M. Szmidt wrote: Have you tried reading `(automake) Autotools Introduction'? It is part of the automake manual. Hi, I printed out all the autotools manuals and have read every page of them more than once. It was a while ago, so it's easy to forget things. Searching the online manual

autoscan

2010-03-20 Thread Russell Shaw
Hi, I ran autoscan and it gives: configure.ac: warning: missing AC_PROG_RANLIB wanted by: ltmain.sh:1601 So i added AC_PROG_RANLIB and ran autoreconf and now it says: autoreconf: Entering directory `.' autoreconf: configure.ac: not using Gettext autoreconf: running: aclocal -I m4

Re: Problems with X.org and incompatibilities with in-house software

2010-02-28 Thread Russell Shaw
Richard Brown wrote: Mikhail Gusarov wrote: Twas brillig at 19:05:25 28.02.2010 UTC-05 when rbrown1...@gmail.com did gyre and gimble: RB So of these disabled, removed extensions. How many of these are RB disabled as a result of actual broken code, vs, how many are RB disabled because, we

Re: Problems with X.org and incompatibilities with in-house software

2010-02-28 Thread Russell Shaw
David Gerard wrote: On 1 March 2010 01:28, Richard Brown rbrown1...@gmail.com wrote: Russell Shaw wrote: What are you referring to by Ximage ? Ximage extension to the X server. It has been superceded by MIT shared memory. However, some ancient apps may still use it. It's not clear

Re: Remarks on gtk docs

2010-02-17 Thread Russell Shaw
Ed James wrote: Joost, and others, I tried learning to use gtk, gdk, cairo, pango, etc several years ago and was frustrated by the difficulty in getting good docs, sample code, etc. Even worse was finding that constant change meant me having to rewrite code fairly often. Note that I'm an

Re: Dual-head config broke with update to 1.4.2

2010-02-16 Thread Russell Shaw
Martin Cracauer wrote: ... Anyway... I will also spend some time this week to test the available Window managers to see where they stand wrt xrandr and report back. I noticed that fvwm2 seems broken enough to not even get keyboard focus over to the added desktops, ever. I also don't

Re: X11 fullscreen

2010-02-04 Thread Russell Shaw
David Bronaugh wrote: Russell Shaw wrote: *SNIP* You have plenty of time on your hands, don't you? This can mean only one thing: You have an idea to sell, in the hopes that people will jump on board and run with it and you won't have to do any work. I hate to disappoint you

Remote X

2010-02-02 Thread Russell Shaw
Hi, Is remote execution of X clients away from the X server still regarded as a design goal, or does everyone just develop for client applications that only run on or close to the X server machine? With a unicode text widget, every time a character is entered, the line or paragraph(s) need to be

Re: Remote X

2010-02-02 Thread Russell Shaw
Patrick O'Donnell wrote: Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 01:18:01 +1100 From: Russell Shaw rjs...@netspace.net.au User-Agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20091109) Sender: xorg-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org Is remote execution of X clients away from the X server still regarded as a design goal

Re: X11 fullscreen

2010-01-31 Thread Russell Shaw
Daniel Stone wrote: On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 12:04:41AM +1100, Russell Shaw wrote: Daniel Stone wrote: On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 10:53:11AM +1100, Russell Shaw wrote: One can make their own widget libraries based on Xlib, then write apps using the libraries. Nothing hard about that (hard

Re: X11 fullscreen

2010-01-31 Thread Russell Shaw
Clemens Eisserer wrote: Man, don't have a job? Is your time worth anything to you? And by the way ... I've never read so many *strange* arguments in one discussion. (using shm ximage for normal drawing is bullshit) What do you suggest? I'd very much like to know. How do other toolkits draw

Re: X11 fullscreen

2010-01-31 Thread Russell Shaw
Russell Shaw wrote: Daniel Stone wrote: On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 12:04:41AM +1100, Russell Shaw wrote: Daniel Stone wrote: On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 10:53:11AM +1100, Russell Shaw wrote: ... He doesn't want non-trivial widgets, he wants full-screen and a menu, remember? That's not something

Re: X11 fullscreen

2010-01-31 Thread Russell Shaw
Clemens Eisserer wrote: Man, don't have a job? Is your time worth anything to you? And by the way ... I've never read so many *strange* arguments in one discussion. (using shm ximage for normal drawing is bullshit) What do you suggest? I'd very much like to know. How do other toolkits draw

Re: X11 fullscreen

2010-01-30 Thread Russell Shaw
Daniel Stone wrote: On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 12:13:23AM +1100, Russell Shaw wrote: This means abstracting everything with pointer indirections leading to slow Any performance problems you may have are not caused by excessive pointer dereferences. Not directly. In the context of widget kits

Re: X11 fullscreen

2010-01-29 Thread Russell Shaw
Daniel Stone wrote: On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 10:41:04PM +1100, Russell Shaw wrote: Forget widget toolkits. They're totally lame wrappers that hide all the useful functionality from you, run like a waterlogged sheep, and otherwise assume you don't want to get anything really nontrivial running

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >