do with Heyne in a lecture class of 150.
Thanks for listening to me rant.
Comments?
-Jeffrey Rous
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/24/02 11:57PM
Howdy,
Let me apologize in advance for this letter being too
long.
With all due respect, I think I may be disagreeing
with Mr. Foldarvy. First, I think his
this be rational?
-Jeffrey Rous
I know some immigrants send some of their money to relatives in their
previous countries, but they can't send all of it; most must be spent
in the host country.
And even if they send the money out of the county, it eventually leads to a greater
demand for exports.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/03/03
As a topic, I am more interested local parks and other local greenspace rather than
golf courses and Disney World. It seems that to have parks provided by private
developers requires the type of sprawling enclave development that many city planners
(and most of my homebuying friends) are
and higher, at least perceived, crime rates.
I have some thoughts about why new development is looking the way it is, but I am not
satisfied with any of them.
Stephen Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/30/04 12:04PM
On Jul 30, 2004, at 12:54 PM, Jeffrey Rous wrote:
At the same time, none of my
Economists are not hostile to public goods.
I guess I did overstate it a bit. Among my more conservative, pro-market economist
friends, there is a general suspicion of the public goods argument. I think that
mostly, this comes from a distrust of government. Fair enough. Anyway, that is where
From CNN.com:
Sen. John Kerry's campaign refused to concede early Wednesday, arguing
that more than 250,000 provisional and absentee ballots remained to be
counted in the key battleground state of Ohio.
New Mexico will not release presidential election results until later
Wednesday because
I think the debate is over the tax rate where revenue is maximized. If it is
near 25%, you can argue cutting taxes will raise revenue, if it is nearer to
60%, cutting taxes will cause revenue to fall. I am sure there has been
research on this, but I do not know the consensus (last I heard, the
In addition, the book you site seems to have missed something big. If I recall
correctly, studies have shown that smokers generally place less of a burden on
Medicaid/Medicare than non-smokers. This is because non-smokers live longer,
giving them more time to accumulate medical bills, and
I guess the market failure would be one of capital markets not being able to
respond fast enough and offering high interest loans to the poor and infirm in
N.O. so that they could pay to evacuate within a day or two. Possibly, the
market for information failed in that people in N.O. did not
10 matches
Mail list logo
