Charles Polisher wrote on 04/10/2011 11:39 PM:
Perhaps something in my idea could be salvaged in some future
effort to enhamce the wiki's content.
The Wiki is in need of a lot of love, and need not wait on Website 2.0,
so please jump in with ideas and/or actions to improve it.
Phil
Am 11.04.11 05:39, schrieb Charles Polisher:
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
schrieb Charles Polisher:
Please make me a wiki editor. I want to create my personal home page.
Is CharlesPolisher your wiki account?
Yes it is, sorry for the omission.
http://wiki.centos.org/CharlesPolisher is yours
Estimados Amigos:
Actualmente tengo dos servidores DELL T710 12 Gb Ram y Raid 5 (4
discos de 500 Gb), mas una uniad de Cinta LT03. Uno de ellos posee
Centos 5.5 y queria consultarles la mejor forma de crear imagen del
servidor Centos y si es posible replicarlo en el segundo servidor.
Muchas
El 04/04/11 15:27, Azu Carlitox escribió:
Hola a todos. Tengo el siguiente problema:
Desde hace tiempo tengo instalado y configurado un servidor con openfire
sobre CentOS. El mismo valida los usuarios con un Active Directory que tengo
en la red. El problema se dio cuando cambie el servidor de
utiliza dd, man dd para mas info.
El 10 de abril de 2011 16:42, Marcelo Aguirre maguirre...@gmail.comescribió:
Estimados Amigos:
Actualmente tengo dos servidores DELL T710 12 Gb Ram y Raid 5 (4
discos de 500 Gb), mas una uniad de Cinta LT03. Uno de ellos posee
Centos 5.5 y queria
carlos restrepo wrote:
utiliza dd, man dd para mas info.
rsync ? no sirve para cinta... quizá tar o star, son buenísimos.
saludos
epe
El 10 de abril de 2011 16:42, Marcelo Aguirremaguirre...@gmail.comescribió:
Estimados Amigos:
Actualmente tengo dos servidores DELL T710 12 Gb Ram y Raid
Saludos comunidad, tengo un problema con mi Pc, he instalado Centos 5.5 y no
reconoce el hardware respectivo que detallo a continuacion:
Driver Brigge : Intel Corporation 82801 Mobile PCI Bridge (Ver
93)
--- Network Controller : Atheros Communications Inc AR9285 Wireless
Hola muy buenas, estoy intentando aprender un poquito más sobre red
hat, ya que se utiliza muchísimo en empresas y como esto es una lista
para Centos y son muy parecidos, quería saber si alguien sabe como
obtener los derechos para poder instalar aplicaciones y actualizarlo.
Por ejemplo al
Pagando la suscripción a Red Hat Network.
Tendrás actualizaciones, soporte técnico y mas detalles.
2011/4/12 Maykel Franco Hernandez may...@maykel.sytes.net
Hola muy buenas, estoy intentando aprender un poquito más sobre red
hat, ya que se utiliza muchísimo en empresas y como esto es una
Sorry, hopefully fixed account and computer that started this.
Damn
- Original Message
From: Ljubomir Ljubojevic off...@plnet.rs
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
Sent: Sun, April 10, 2011 6:29:15 AM
Subject: Re: [CentOS] (no subject)
Steven Vishoot wrote:
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of Ed Westphal
Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2011 2:24 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: [CentOS] 5.6 update experience - EXCELLENT!
Just updated 98 packages on this ole hardware raid 10 box -
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of Mathieu Baudier
Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2011 5:22 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.6
(especially for focusing on 5.6 before 6.0)
Hear-here!
--
/Sorin
Just updated 98 packages on this ole hardware raid 10 box - 5.6 final is
running just fine. No problems. THANKS.
Topping that; 175 packages dropped in on my test-machine at work. 8-)
Feels like
I'm getting spoiled with updates like this that just work. ;*)
So far, so good. Great work
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of Phil Schaffner
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 3:55 AM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] ext4 support in anaconda?
S.Tindall wrote on 04/10/2011 01:46 PM:
Just boot the installer
S.Tindall wrote:
On Sun, 2011-04-10 at 21:00 -0400, Stephen Harris wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:33:56AM +0200, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
Is there an easy way to determine what rpms might be missing? I'd hoped
to use something like rpm -qR against each of the installed packages,
but
Lanny Marcus wrote:
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic off...@plnet.rs wrote:
Olaf Mueller wrote:
I am searching for an internet usb surf-stick (umts) that works under
CentOS. Is anyone using such a stick and if so, which chip has this
usb-stick?
Would a Huawei E160E chip
On Sun, 2011-04-10 at 09:39 -0700, Chuck Munro wrote:
Hello All,
Just a short note to add my vote for a HUGE round of applause to the
CentOS team for their untiring efforts in getting releases out the door.
I've just upgraded several servers to 5.6 and it all just works.
This is one of
Hello, after updating to Cents 5.6 and so to kvm-83-224
my KVM virtual machines qemu qcow2 based images do not start anymore.
Looking at VM console the error message is that VM media is not bootable.
Going back to previous KVM version kvm-83-164 from Centos 5.5 they works
again.
What's wrong
why don't you simply rsync down what you need? Installing of a mounted iso
via pxe is probably the less preferred method. rsync also gives you the
option of excluding stuff you don't need.
Kai
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Try a yum update and look at the output. Now, with a new release this is a
good option, anyway.
Kai
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Le 11/04/2011 11:30, Riccardo Veraldi a écrit :
Hello, after updating to Cents 5.6 and so to kvm-83-224
my KVM virtual machines qemu qcow2 based images do not start anymore.
Looking at VM console the error message is that VM media is not bootable.
Going back to previous KVM version kvm-83-164
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 5:30 AM, Riccardo Veraldi
riccardo.vera...@cnaf.infn.it wrote:
Hello, after updating to Cents 5.6 and so to kvm-83-224
my KVM virtual machines qemu qcow2 based images do not start anymore.
Looking at VM console the error message is that VM media is not bootable.
On 4/11/11 11:45 AM, Tom H wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 5:30 AM, Riccardo Veraldi
riccardo.vera...@cnaf.infn.it wrote:
Hello, after updating to Cents 5.6 and so to kvm-83-224
my KVM virtual machines qemu qcow2 based images do not start anymore.
Looking at VM console the error message is
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 04:37, Mister IT Guru misteritg...@gmx.com wrote:
On Sun, 2011-04-10 at 09:39 -0700, Chuck Munro wrote:
RedHat's move to defend their support business against the
freeloading distro vendors (we all know who those sharks are!) wasn't
aimed at CentOS, but it has
I'm hazarding a guess here - that the os/{i386,x86_64}/CentOS/*.rpm's that
have 'centos' in the name have had changes made for CentOS. The others
have not and the sources are available from upstream at eg
http://mirrors.kernel.org/redhat/redhat/linux/enterprise/5Server/en/os/SRPMS/
Can
On 04/11/2011 12:46 AM, Bob Hepple wrote:
Oh well, so much for that idea! According to the release notes
(http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS5.6) there is a list
of packages modified by centos - and that includes httpd. So the
absence of 'centos' in the release string does _not_
On 04/10/2011 05:00 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 7:16 AM, Steve Clarkscl...@netwolves.com wrote:
On 04/07/2011 05:14 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
Great. Please keep us posted. If the patches work as expected, they
will be a worthy addition to the cplus kernel.
I got a kernel built
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of Phil Schaffner
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 3:55 AM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] ext4 support in anaconda?
S.Tindall wrote on 04/10/2011 01:46 PM:
Just boot the installer
On Sunday 10 April 2011 17:31:15 Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Eero Volotinen wrote on Sun, 10 Apr 2011 17:41:20 +0300:
well, I think geoip library it not supported in rhel and this requires
geoip library..
yeah, geoip is an rpmforge package.
Marko, you can easily compile it yourself, it's a set of
Later this week I will have to install a serious KVM setup, and I am
looking for background material.
I found a nice how-to:
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/KVM
...but it is probably partly outdated by now.
Then there is a fine virtualization manual:
5.6 version of the virtualization guide from RedHat includes Xen and KVM:
http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/5/html/Virtualization/index.html
-Giovanni
On Apr 11, 2011, at 9:01 AM, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
Later this week I will have to install a serious KVM setup, and I am
Jerry Geis wrote:
I have updated to 5.6 - GREAT job guys...
when I do host slashdot.org for example it comes back immediately.
when I enter slashdot.org on firefox it says Looking up slashdot.org
for a LONG time like 15 or 20 seconds
before continuing.
I have set network.dns.disableIPv6
What is the package that allows copy and paste between windows?
I think I need to yum reinstall it.
after the 5.6 update I get the copy button when I right click - (for
example in thunderbird)
put when I then goto a console window and try to right click and paste
the paste is grey-ed or ghosted.
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Chuck Munro chu...@seafoam.net wrote:
Just a short note to add my vote for a HUGE round of applause to the
CentOS team for their untiring efforts in getting releases out the door.
I've just upgraded several servers to 5.6 and it all just works.
snip
+1 for
Jerry Geis wrote:
What is the package that allows copy and paste between windows?
I think I need to yum reinstall it.
after the 5.6 update I get the copy button when I right click - (for
example in thunderbird)
put when I then goto a console window and try to right click and paste
the
On 04/11/2011 05:53 AM, Tom Brown wrote:
I'm hazarding a guess here - that the os/{i386,x86_64}/CentOS/*.rpm's that
have 'centos' in the name have had changes made for CentOS. The others
have not and the sources are available from upstream at eg
On 11.4.2011 16.07, Torres, Giovanni (NIH/NINDS) [C] wrote:
5.6 version of the virtualization guide from RedHat includes Xen and KVM:
Oh damn. I didn't notice the URL which said 5.2. Thanks.
- Jussi
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
At Mon, 11 Apr 2011 09:34:06 -0400 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
What is the package that allows copy and paste between windows?
I think I need to yum reinstall it.
after the 5.6 update I get the copy button when I right click - (for
example in thunderbird)
put when I then
At Mon, 11 Apr 2011 15:46:17 +0200 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
Jerry Geis wrote:
What is the package that allows copy and paste between windows?
I think I need to yum reinstall it.
after the 5.6 update I get the copy button when I right click - (for
example in
Instead of removing the unwanted .repo files, replace them with empty files.
That way an upgrade should just result in a .rpmnew file being created.
because by removing them from the centos-release package and
rebuilding it they are not there in the first place.
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 07:26:55PM -0500, Gilbert Sebenste wrote:
Remember, you could have been at the limit of reboots before it does a
automatic fsck. Been there, done that.
...or time, if the filesystem has a force-fsck-after-N-days feature.
Yes, it could have, but it's been 2 hours now,
On Saturday 09 April 2011 14:01:34 Luigi Rosa wrote:
Just one thing: THANK YOU ALL!!!
+3 servers! 8)
And I guess no. 4, as soon as hardware gets fixed... ;-)
Best, :-)
Marko
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Robert Heller wrote:
At Mon, 11 Apr 2011 15:46:17 +0200 CentOS mailing listcentos@centos.org
wrote:
Jerry Geis wrote:
What is the package that allows copy and paste between windows?
I think I need to yum reinstall it.
after the 5.6 update I get the copy button when I right click - (for
Luigi Rosa wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Just one thing: THANK YOU ALL!!!
#insert EU_anthem
(In addition to the update, NO MORE WHEN WILL 5.6 COME OUT?!?!?!?!?!!!
threads!)
mark
___
CentOS mailing list
On 04/11/2011 10:17 AM, Nicolas Ross wrote:
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 07:26:55PM -0500, Gilbert Sebenste wrote:
Remember, you could have been at the limit of reboots before it does a
automatic fsck. Been there, done that.
...or time, if the filesystem has a force-fsck-after-N-days feature.
Yes,
Jerry Geis wrote:
What is the package that allows copy and paste between windows?
I think I need to yum reinstall it.
after the 5.6 update I get the copy button when I right click - (for
example in thunderbird)
put when I then goto a console window and try to right click and paste
the
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
Luigi Rosa wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Just one thing: THANK YOU ALL!!!
#insert EU_anthem
(In addition to the update, NO MORE WHEN WILL 5.6 COME
OUT?!?!?!?!?!!! threads!)
So when will 6.0 be out?
(sorry; yes I am OCD-enabled;
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of m.r...@5-cent.us
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 4:52 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.6
(In addition to the update, NO MORE WHEN WILL 5.6 COME OUT?!?!?!?!?!!!
Just tried running a configuration on 5.6 with ext4 as the /
partitition. I got the error
that cannot boot ext4 partition. bummer I know this is just a boot
issue and make the ext3 but I was disappointed.
Maybe 6.0 will have ext4 bootable.
jerry
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Jerry Geis ge...@pagestation.com wrote:
Just tried running a configuration on 5.6 with ext4 as the /
partitition. I got the error
that cannot boot ext4 partition. bummer I know this is just a boot
issue and make the ext3 but I was disappointed.
Maybe 6.0
Jerry Geis wrote:
What is the package that allows copy and paste between windows?
I think I need to yum reinstall it.
after the 5.6 update I get the copy button when I right click - (for
example in thunderbird)
put when I then goto a console window and try to right click and paste
the
Jerry Geis wrote:
Jerry Geis wrote:
What is the package that allows copy and paste between windows?
I think I need to yum reinstall it.
after the 5.6 update I get the copy button when I right click - (for
example in thunderbird)
put when I then goto a console window and try to right click
Tom Brown wrote on Mon, 11 Apr 2011 15:08:48 +0100:
because by removing them from the centos-release package and
rebuilding it they are not there in the first place.
Yeah, but you have to do that all the time (e.g. with each update).
Replacing with empty files is a one-time operation.
Kai
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
The main support *I* need is timely updates and releases.
This is the key indicator that says you want RHEL not CentOS.
Insert spiffy .sig here:
Life is complex: it has both real and imaginary parts.
//me
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
Just tried running a configuration on 5.6 with ext4 as the /
partitition. I got the error that cannot boot ext4 partition.
bummer I know this is just a boot issue and make the ext3 but I
was disappointed.
Maybe 6.0 will have ext4 bootable.
I installed
What is the package that allows copy and paste
between windows?
How do you connect to centos? VNC?
If you're running vnc4server on the centos box, there's a program you have
to leave running named vncconfig that allows clipboard xfer...
___
CentOS
On 4/11/2011 10:55 AM, Brunner, Brian T. wrote:
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
The main support *I* need is timely updates and releases.
This is the key indicator that says you want RHEL not CentOS.
That's only true if you think the CentOS team is incapable of matching
some definition of
On 04/10/2011 07:15 PM, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
You just gave me examples of more person Foo dropping by Bar... I'm
not sure how that can shorten the gap between upstream and CentOS
releases. It seems more in the way of giving user support.
No, re-read what I said. Ownership in the
On 04/11/11 9:14 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
The main support*I* need is timely updates and releases.
This is the key indicator that says you want RHEL not CentOS.
That's only true if you think the CentOS team is incapable of matching
some definition of 'timely'.
well, whatever your
Brunner, Brian T. wrote:
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
Luigi Rosa wrote:
Just one thing: THANK YOU ALL!!!
#insert EU_anthem
(In addition to the update, NO MORE WHEN WILL 5.6 COME
OUT?!?!?!?!?!!! threads!)
So when will 6.0 be out?
(sorry; yes I am OCD-enabled; no obviously I have no
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
On 4/11/2011 10:55 AM, Brunner, Brian T. wrote:
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
The main support *I* need is timely updates and releases.
This is the key indicator that says you want RHEL not CentOS.
That's only true if you think the CentOS team is
On 04/11/2011 07:25 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
On 04/10/2011 05:00 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 7:16 AM, Steve Clarkscl...@netwolves.com wrote:
On 04/07/2011 05:14 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
Great. Please keep us posted. If the patches work as expected, they
will be a worthy addition
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Steve Clark scl...@netwolves.com wrote:
On 04/11/2011 07:25 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
On 04/10/2011 05:00 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
I got a kernel built with the patches using the wiki and your notes in
0004586 (thanks). I am pleased to report
that they appear to
On 04/11/2011 01:08 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Steve Clarkscl...@netwolves.com wrote:
On 04/11/2011 07:25 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
On 04/10/2011 05:00 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
I got a kernel built with the patches using the wiki and your notes in
0004586 (thanks). I am
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Steve Clark scl...@netwolves.com wrote:
Hmm... without looking at the dates of the files I had downloaded the
kernel-2.6.32-71.18.2.el6.centos.ayplus.i686.rpm 09-Mar-2011
11:36
files let me try the
On 04/11/2011 01:19 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Steve Clarkscl...@netwolves.com wrote:
Hmm... without looking at the dates of the files I had downloaded the
kernel-2.6.32-71.18.2.el6.centos.ayplus.i686.rpm 09-Mar-2011
11:36
files let me try the
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 10:45 AM, Steve Clark scl...@netwolves.com wrote:
On 04/11/2011 01:19 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
Yes, that ( 2.6.32-71.24.1.el6.centos.ayplus.1 ) is the right one. :)
Akemi
HOORAY - it works.
I got an ipv6 address:
$ ip6 a s eth2
4: eth2:
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Brunner, Brian T. wrote:
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
On 4/11/2011 10:55 AM, Brunner, Brian T. wrote:
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
The main support *I* need is timely updates and releases.
This is the key indicator that says you want RHEL not CentOS.
That's
At Mon, 11 Apr 2011 17:27:54 +0200 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
Jerry Geis wrote:
Jerry Geis wrote:
What is the package that allows copy and paste between windows?
I think I need to yum reinstall it.
after the 5.6 update I get the copy button when I right click - (for
On 04/11/2011 01:51 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 10:45 AM, Steve Clarkscl...@netwolves.com wrote:
On 04/11/2011 01:19 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
Yes, that ( 2.6.32-71.24.1.el6.centos.ayplus.1 ) is the right one. :)
Akemi
HOORAY - it works.
I got an ipv6 address:
$ ip6 a s eth2
On 4/11/2011 1:22 PM, Robert Heller wrote:
does it work if you log in as another user?
So long as it is the same X Server. If you log into a different console
and then do a 'startx -- :1' (or :2, :3, etc.), then no it won't work.
If you just do a su or sudo su in a [gnome] terminal, then
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 08:19:22PM +0200, Dag Wieers wrote:
Considering you follow the it's released when it's ready mantra, what
[ ... ]
I no longer expect any change.
Then why are you always coming back here to voice your concerns
if you don't expect any change?
Tru
--
Tru Huynh
Hi,
I'ld like to know where or how I can find changes in a package update.
Also, is there a way to find out which package updates are security updates?
thanks
--
Bernard
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 19:54, Bernard Fay bernard@enodegroup.com wrote:
Hi,
I'ld like to know where or how I can find changes in a package update.
http://linux.die.net/man/1/yum-changelog
rpm -qa --changelog foo.bar.rpm
Cheers,
--
Kind Regards,
Christopher J. Buckley
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Tru Huynh t...@centos.org wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 08:19:22PM +0200, Dag Wieers wrote:
Considering you follow the it's released when it's ready mantra, what
[ ... ]
I no longer expect any change.
Then why are you always coming back here to voice your
Great! Thanks a lot!
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Christopher J. Buckley ch...@cjbuckley.net
wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 19:54, Bernard Fay bernard@enodegroup.com
wrote:
Hi,
I'ld like to know where or how I can find changes in a package update.
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Tru Huynh wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 08:19:22PM +0200, Dag Wieers wrote:
Considering you follow the it's released when it's ready mantra, what
[ ... ]
I no longer expect any change.
Then why are you always coming back here to voice your concerns
if you don't
On 04/11/2011 03:10 PM, Dag Wieers wrote:
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Tru Huynh wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 08:19:22PM +0200, Dag Wieers wrote:
Considering you follow the it's released when it's ready mantra, what
[ ... ]
I no longer expect any change.
Then why are you always coming back
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
/putting on asbestos pants.
Not needed... And they itch.
Perhaps the tack to take is to apply pressure to the upstream provider
to release the build details? I am sure that many folks who start with
CentOS, grow to be large and move to RH proper. So there is,
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Digimer wrote:
On 04/11/2011 03:10 PM, Dag Wieers wrote:
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Tru Huynh wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 08:19:22PM +0200, Dag Wieers wrote:
Considering you follow the it's released when it's ready mantra, what
[ ... ]
I no longer expect any change.
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 03:03:05PM -0400, Brian Mathis wrote:
I for one am glad about it as it is obvious that it needs to be
addressed.
we all agree that it can be done better/faster/...
The constant retorts against anyone asking is just
unbelievable. Maybe if the questions can be read
On Apr 9, 2011, at 8:22 AM, Mathieu Baudier wrote:
Just one thing: THANK YOU ALL!!!
Thanks a lot!
(especially for focusing on 5.6 before 6.0)
+1
--
Ryan Ordway E-mail: rord...@oregonstate.edu
Unix Systems Administrator rord...@library.oregonstate.edu
On 4/11/2011 2:33 PM, Tru Huynh wrote:
Make your own experiment (i.e rebuild your own clone) and document/report back
what you find out as the proper order of rebuild of the upstream SRPMS ?
So having everyone repeat the same mistakes with no coordination is your
idea of doing things faster?
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Tru Huynh wrote:
4) back to your genuine inquiry how can I help it be ready faster?
Make your own experiment (i.e rebuild your own clone) and document/report back
what you find out as the proper order of rebuild of the upstream SRPMS ?
[... anything usefull for your
On 04/11/2011 11:04 AM, Brunner, Brian T. wrote:
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
Just tried running a configuration on 5.6 with ext4 as the /
partitition. I got the error that cannot boot ext4 partition.
bummer I know this is just a boot issue and make the ext3 but I
was disappointed.
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 09:48:18PM +0200, Dag Wieers wrote:
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Tru Huynh wrote:
4) back to your genuine inquiry how can I help it be ready faster?
Make your own experiment (i.e rebuild your own clone) and document/report
back
what you find out as the proper order of
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 02:44:03PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 4/11/2011 2:33 PM, Tru Huynh wrote:
Make your own experiment (i.e rebuild your own clone) and document/report
back
what you find out as the proper order of rebuild of the upstream SRPMS ?
So having everyone repeat the
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Tru Huynh wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 09:48:18PM +0200, Dag Wieers wrote:
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Tru Huynh wrote:
4) back to your genuine inquiry how can I help it be ready faster?
Make your own experiment (i.e rebuild your own clone) and document/report
back
what
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 10:00:57PM +0200, Dag Wieers wrote:
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Tru Huynh wrote:
right: you are locked inside a maze, there is one exit somewhere.
Everyone start from the same place, eveyone benefit from the
person who find the exit. We don't have the solution at the
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 10:13 PM, Tru Huynh t...@centos.org wrote:
[free troll feeding is over for me]
--
Do you want payment for your troll feeding now? ;)
--
Kind Regards
Rudi Ahlers
SoftDux
Website: http://www.SoftDux.com
Technical Blog: http://Blog.SoftDux.com
Office: 087 805 9573
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Steve Clark scl...@netwolves.com wrote:
On 04/11/2011 01:51 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
By the way, has this been accepted in the mainline kernel?
The patches are in 2.6.38.2 just downloaded from kernel.org.
Indeed. Just found it here:
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Tru Huynh wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 10:00:57PM +0200, Dag Wieers wrote:
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Tru Huynh wrote:
right: you are locked inside a maze, there is one exit somewhere.
Everyone start from the same place, eveyone benefit from the
person who find the exit. We
On 4/11/2011 2:59 PM, Tru Huynh wrote:
Make your own experiment (i.e rebuild your own clone) and document/report
back
what you find out as the proper order of rebuild of the upstream SRPMS ?
So having everyone repeat the same mistakes with no coordination is your
idea of doing things
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 10:20:59PM +0200, Dag Wieers wrote:
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Tru Huynh wrote:
...
My maze is the build order (ie dependancy order of the SRPMS),
What are yours? how do you get to that number of mazes?
The build order is not what took 86 days, was it ?
it's too easy to
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 03:37:28PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 4/11/2011 2:59 PM, Tru Huynh wrote:
Make your own experiment (i.e rebuild your own clone) and document/report
back
what you find out as the proper order of rebuild of the upstream SRPMS ?
So having everyone repeat the
On 11/04/11 20:16, Digimer wrote:
/putting on asbestos pants.
each release is more complex than the last. The web of dependency grows,
so the reverse-engineering takes longer and longer.
This is just complete nonsense. You clearly have no understanding of the
processes involved in
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Tru Huynh wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 10:20:59PM +0200, Dag Wieers wrote:
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Tru Huynh wrote:
...
My maze is the build order (ie dependancy order of the SRPMS),
What are yours? how do you get to that number of mazes?
The build order is not what
Did the Announce go out for CentOS 5.6, or are people just jumping the gun?
If it went out, I missed it, and need to look at my spam filters.
If it hasn't gone out yet, then maybe I'm OK...
See... No is it ready crap in here!
___
CentOS mailing list
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Tru Huynh wrote:
I only see wasted time talking, no actions. I will be happy to be proven
wrong.
We are more alike than it seems at first. I don't see actions either, I
only see the output of actions because the process is deliberately closed.
--
-- dag wieers,
Tru Huynh wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 03:37:28PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 4/11/2011 2:59 PM, Tru Huynh wrote:
Make your own experiment (i.e rebuild your own clone) and
document/report back what you find out as the proper order of
rebuild of the upstream SRPMS ?
So having
1 - 100 of 151 matches
Mail list logo