CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2014:1260
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-1260.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2014:1269
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2014-1269.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2014:1270
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-1270.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2014:1272
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-1272.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2014:1281 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-1281.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
Just a reminder, the Virt SIG meeting is tomorrow on IRC (channel
#centos-devel) at 1pm UTC (2pm BST, 9am EST).
I've (finally) done a draft update of the Virt SIG roadmap:
http://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Virtualization/Roadmap
The concept I had was to have a number of different
Thank you John
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 12:36 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
On 9/18/2014 9:14 PM, Chandran Manikandan wrote:
Dear All,
I would like to study and practice for storage in Centos 5 and 6. Could
anyone guide me.
What is cluster and Virtualization technology how
On 9/21/2014 12:50, John R Pierce wrote:
every so often, I'm seeing these in my dmesg output, and I'm not sure
what they are?
host[32625]: segfault at 0 ip 0040abb8 sp 7ff59d36bd40 error
4 in host[40+1b000]
host[24560]: segfault at 0 ip 0040abb8 sp 7f4fa1c4bd40 error
Hi,
My bosses are running into an issue, where we type ls on a nfs mounted
filesystem, and files that are there are not listed...
I thought it was pilot error until my big boss showed me...
but we can vi the files, we can access them via other means if we know
the name. Then once we have
On Mon, 22 Sep 2014 10:48:32 -0500
Dan Hyatt wrote:
but we can vi the files, we can access them via other means if we know
the name. Then once we have accessed them, LS now shows the files.
Sounds like a caching issue to me. After you have accessed the file, it's in
the cache and you can
On 2014-09-22, Frank Cox thea...@melvilletheatre.com wrote:
On Mon, 22 Sep 2014 10:48:32 -0500
Dan Hyatt wrote:
but we can vi the files, we can access them via other means if we know
the name. Then once we have accessed them, LS now shows the files.
Sounds like a caching issue to me.
I dunno if this ours, or an upstream enhancement, but I was just
rebuilding a 6.5 box with 7. I selected custom formatting.
1. It seems to autoselect *ALL* drives. I would strongly argue that it
should *only* select the first drive, or whichever is already bootable.
That could be disastrous if
So how do I fix it.
We actually have a widespread problem with files and directories
disappearing... as it is one user in particular it might be pilot
error, but it might be this. Because this is happening to two competent
users.
On 9/22/2014 1:11 PM, Keith Keller wrote:
On 2014-09-22,
Yes, imagine connected to your large data filesystems.
Or worse yet, you have a data center power down
PXE for some reason is set on all switches as the first choice
and any mounted filesystem might get wiped...
On 9/22/2014 3:06 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I dunno if this ours, or an upstream
On Mon, September 22, 2014 3:14 pm, Dan Hyatt wrote:
Yes, imagine connected to your large data filesystems.
Or worse yet, you have a data center power down
PXE for some reason is set on all switches as the first choice
and any mounted filesystem might get wiped...
I had an assistant a
I have one user. We've pretty much all got two monitors, but he insists on
rotating both of them vertically - that is, they're taller than they are
wide, and he's got a Radeon card. I always have X grief on his system when
I update it
I just did a full update. X comes up in both screens...
On Mon, 22 Sep 2014 15:12:07 -0500
Dan Hyatt wrote:
but we can vi the files, we can access them via other means if we know
the name. Then once we have accessed them, LS now shows the files.
Sounds like a caching issue to me. After you have accessed the file, it's
in the cache and you
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I have one user. We've pretty much all got two monitors, but he insists on
rotating both of them vertically - that is, they're taller than they are
wide, and he's got a Radeon card. I always have X grief on his system when
I update it
I just did a full update. X
On 2014-09-22, Dan Hyatt dhy...@dsgmail.wustl.edu wrote:
So how do I fix it.
If it is in fact client-side, you have to fix the client. If these are
Windows NFS clients then I am not much help. Perhaps the maintainers of
the NFS client software have heard of this issue.
If you have Samba
Anything enlightening showing up in /var/log/Xorg.0.log? Maybe
something explaining why your conf is being ignored?
Kahlil (Kal) Hodgson GPG: C9A02289
Head of Technology (m) +61 (0) 4 2573 0382
DealMax Pty Ltd(w) +61 (0) 3
Apologies for previous top post. Gmail was being, well, Gmail :-(
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
22 matches
Mail list logo
