: playing around with CGI::Application for the first time...
Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2003 15:32:17 -0400
From: Richard Dice [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jesse:
Hello again... I hope all has been well with you...
So, I'm web programming again. *sigh* :-) It's a temporary gig until
the 2nd
Whippo, Ryan K wrote:
I have a form paragraph that once it has more than 1975 characters in
it, the submit button on the form will not work. Any ideas?
Are you using the GET method to submit your form? (i.e. via the URL and
the QUERY_STRING environment variable) I thought that that was
Hello everyone...
I was wondering if there was a way to specify a list of paths for the
template provided by -load_tmpl to search view the TMPL_PATH in -new.
E.g.
my $webapp = MyApp-new(
TMPL_PATH = [
'../apptmpls/MyApp',
Andy Taylor wrote:
I'm getting ready to start a fairly large project using CGI::App and I was just wondering how some of the more experienced/knowledgeable people on this list handle some issues.
1. if you are doing a project with a superclass and several modules, where do you put your templates
a little because it's not really one of my VALID run modes, but
declaring it with $self-run_modes() means that if someone calls my app
with rm=AUTOLOAD CGI::App thinks it's a valid run-mode.
If someone calls your run mode? Isn't the programmer the one who sets
up the rm= URL or form query info?
This is a really good idea.
I've got a number of editors, publishers, agents, etc. in my Rolodex (well,
Palm) -- the bounty of having written a number of books already over the past
few years. It wouldn't be hard to sell this idea.
Jesse, whaddaya think? Sam, you on this list? :-)
Mark:
There's a lot to reply to in your email, and not enough time on my part to do
so. I'll just hit a few quick points here...
I don't think we have be exclusive about the modules that we choose to
mention. While there are may be favorite, recommended or popular
modules to include, partly
John:
Thanks for chiming in here. I hope that you enjoyed the talk I gave at
Toronto.pm a few months ago on this topic and that it inspired you to
come out for some more. :-)
Excellent point. However (as a one time publisher! and sometime tech writer) it is necessary to be very clear as to
Regarding my suggestion that Class::DBI is preferable to raw SQL DBI
in a large scale complicated web app project, Sam said:
I honestly couldn't disagree more. [deletia]
Class::DBI could indeed be underpowered to handle the kind of
complicated cases that you describe. [ Could Tangram be the
Before I send it to mod_perl list I put it here because the problem
mainly concerns C::A.
No, not really. To the degree that you are having problems with
Apache::Reload, this is a mod_perl/Apache::Reload problem.
But the problem that the error message you gave us pertains to a basic
Perl
I'm not arguing whether setter/getters are good or bad. Just why I'm forced
to use C::A's. Why is that the only way to avoid stepping on C::A's
variables?
It sounds like you want to rewrite the contract. Currently, the contract states
if you use the param method and its implicit get/set
I agree with that if I'm acessing C::A's underlying data structure. What I'm
getting at is why does C::A force its underlying data structure upon me?
Shouldn't I be able to access $self any way I want? Shouldn't there be a way
to prevent me from stepping on C::A's data structure without
@perl.org
To: Richard Dice [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The uploaded file
CGI-Application-Framework-0.22.tar.gz
has entered CPAN as
file: $CPAN/authors/id/R/RD/RDICE/CGI-Application-Framework-0.22.tar.gz
size: 109923 bytes
md5: f69e720d7cfdc2387edda4970cf587fc
No action is required on your part
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2005 14:42:30 +0200
From: PAUSE [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: cpan-testers@perl.org
To: Richard Dice [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The uploaded file
CGI-Application-Framework-0.24.tar.gz
has entered CPAN as
file: $CPAN/authors/id/R/RD/RDICE/CGI-Application-Framework-0.24.tar.gz
size
Dan,
I expect that they're all going to experience the same memory situation. They
all operation on basically the same idea. (Though if anyone out there has a
different perspective then I'd love to hear it. mod_perl is the only one of
them I have extensive experience with.)
Don't forget
Cees said:
All in all, you will get the best performance by using backend
mod_perl server. However, you can get most of the way there, with
lots of flexibility, and little to no configuration with
PersistentPerl.
In my earlier comments I said that I expected mod_perl to be comperable to the
- Forwarded message from PAUSE [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2005 14:39:23 +0200
From: PAUSE [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: cpan-testers@perl.org
Subject: CPAN Upload: R/RD/RDICE/CGI-Application-Framework-0.25.tar.gz
To: Richard Dice [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The uploaded file
Hi everyone...
As many of you would know Michael Graham and I have been putting some
effort into the CGI::Application::Framework project. (
http://search.cpan.org/~rdice/CGI-Application-Framework-0.25/lib/CGI/Application/Framework.pm
)
Matthew Rice, Michael and I have decided to instigate a CAF
Original Message
Subject: CPAN Upload: R/RD/RDICE/CGI-Application-Framework-0.26.tar.gz
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 03:13:47 +0100
From: PAUSE [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: cpan-testers@perl.org
To: Richard Dice [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The uploaded file
CGI-Application-Framework-0.26.tar.gz
has
I see this.
On Dec 12, 2007 10:27 AM, Jesse Erlbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ping?
Jesse Erlbaum
The Erlbaum Group, LLC http://erlbaum.net/
817 Broadway, 10th floor
New York, NY 10003
212-684-6161 (office)
917-647-3059 (mobile)
212-684-6226 (fax)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cees, want a trip back to N. America? :-)
Cheers,
- Richard
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 10:46 AM, Jason A. Crome [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I received this last week from Josh McAdams. Sorry for not passing it
along sooner, but I was out sick most of last week. I don't have time
to do this, but
Hi Leonard,
This effort sounds very similar to the CGI::Application::Framework (CAF,
occasionally we'd call it caffeine) module that Michael Graham and I
released in 2005. We maintained it for a few months afterwards but not
since since -- I'm a manager myself these days and barely code, and
22 matches
Mail list logo
