I support Karthik's point and think there is a long overdue case to call
for all publicly funded work (incl. government works, publications, data
etc.) to be explicitly released into the public domain (as defined here
http://law.yourdictionary.com/articles/what-is-public-domain.html ) or
failing
there was some movement towards the making of govt funded work, or
hopefully just govt work, copyright-free. there were many proposals before
the govt when the last amendment to the copyright act came up for revision.
However such proposals were rejected and they didnt go through.
It is worth
What do you think of websites or organizations that ask you to fill up an
elaborate form or write an elaborate research proposal before they share
their data with you? Do you think such data is really open?
I find monetary paywalls more egalitarian than such artificial paywalls
because in the
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Karthik Shashidhar
karthik.shashid...@gmail.com wrote:
What do you think of websites or organizations that ask you to fill up an
elaborate form or write an elaborate research proposal before they share
their data with you? Do you think such data is really
Hi Karthik,
Very interesting question. However, before putting my points here, I wanted
to know what are you referring to as non-monetary paywalls. Can you give
some examples? It would definitely make the context more clear for me.
Thank you,
Sumant
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Gautam
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Sumant Suresh Kulkarni
kulkarni.sum...@gmail.com wrote:
Very interesting question. However, before putting my points here, I wanted
to know what are you referring to as non-monetary paywalls. Can you give
some examples? It would definitely make the context
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Sumant Suresh Kulkarni
kulkarni.sum...@gmail.com wrote:
Very interesting question. However, before putting my points here, I
wanted to know what are you referring to as non-monetary paywalls. Can you
give some examples? It would definitely make the context
Without taking names. I recently read a report online based on a survey.
Now, I thought there were some different ways to look at and analyze the
survey data, so I wanted to get my hands on the raw data.
But take names no? :)
I stopped responding to surveys from Moneylife (although I respect
