Re: Any reason not to make a new DBI release?

2012-01-30 Thread David E. Wheeler
On Jan 29, 2012, at 11:06 AM, Martin J. Evans wrote:

 I'd be happy with that as I'm looking forward to asking people to use 
 DBI_TRACE=DBD.
 
 I've had no problems with the lastest releases and subversion trunk.

I’d like to see a statement about Unicode support in the docs, and any 
recommendations for how drivers should behave.

Best,

David



Re: Any reason not to make a new DBI release?

2012-01-30 Thread demerphq
On 30 January 2012 00:16, David E. Wheeler da...@justatheory.com wrote:
 On Jan 29, 2012, at 11:06 AM, Martin J. Evans wrote:

 I'd be happy with that as I'm looking forward to asking people to use 
 DBI_TRACE=DBD.

 I've had no problems with the lastest releases and subversion trunk.

 I’d like to see a statement about Unicode support in the docs, and any 
 recommendations for how drivers should behave.

I just joined the list and I don't have the original mail in this
thread to reply to, but I am wondering will this release include Dave
M's work? I guess not. Assuming I am right, how long until the next
release?

cheers,
Yves


-- 
perl -Mre=debug -e /just|another|perl|hacker/


Re: Any reason not to make a new DBI release?

2012-01-30 Thread Tim Bunce
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 11:51:50AM +0100, demerphq wrote:
 On 30 January 2012 00:16, David E. Wheeler da...@justatheory.com wrote:
  On Jan 29, 2012, at 11:06 AM, Martin J. Evans wrote:
 
  I'd be happy with that as I'm looking forward to asking people to use 
  DBI_TRACE=DBD.
 
  I've had no problems with the lastest releases and subversion trunk.
 
  I’d like to see a statement about Unicode support in the docs, and any 
  recommendations for how drivers should behave.

Too late for 1.617 I'm afraid. It's on CPAN already.

 I just joined the list and I don't have the original mail in this
 thread to reply to, but I am wondering will this release include Dave
 M's work? I guess not. Assuming I am right, how long until the next
 release?

Probably not long after Dave's finished his work ;-)

Which also gives a distinct window of opportunity for those interested
in Unicode support to thrash out what the docs should say... [starting
in a new thread please]

Tim.


Re: Any reason not to make a new DBI release?

2012-01-29 Thread Martin J. Evans

On 28/01/2012 10:41, Tim Bunce wrote:

I'd like to make a formal DBI release soon.

DBI-1.616_901 tested well and I've just uploaded DBI-1.616_902.

Any reason I shouldn't upload as DBI-1.617 soon?

Tim.
I'd be happy with that as I'm looking forward to asking people to use 
DBI_TRACE=DBD.


I've had no problems with the lastest releases and subversion trunk.

Martin


Re: Any reason not to make a new DBI release?

2012-01-28 Thread H.Merijn Brand
On Sat, 28 Jan 2012 10:41:56 +, Tim Bunce tim.bu...@pobox.com
wrote:

 I'd like to make a formal DBI release soon.
 
 DBI-1.616_901 tested well and I've just uploaded DBI-1.616_902.
 
 Any reason I shouldn't upload as DBI-1.617 soon?

No objections from me.

-- 
H.Merijn Brand  http://tux.nl   Perl Monger  http://amsterdam.pm.org/
using perl5.00307 .. 5.14   porting perl5 on HP-UX, AIX, and openSUSE
http://mirrors.develooper.com/hpux/http://www.test-smoke.org/
http://qa.perl.org   http://www.goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/