Re: [DBpedia-discussion] DBpedia download vs DBPedia SPARQL data

[Sebastian Hellmann]

Hi Denny,

On 04.06.19 19:40, Denny Vrandečić wrote:

Thank you, I read now through the paper - great work, congratulations!

I am glad to see DBpedia evolve. I am very much looking forward to see 
it move out of Beta.


I am also very glad (and quietly amused) to see you moving to opaque 
identifiers. I think that is the right decision.



We see them as Data Management URIs. You can connect to DBpedia Global 
ID Clusters and thus gain access to everything else. For semantics and 
validation it is strongly advised to keep a local URI from the cluster.





A few questions on the paper:

- the releases for the chapters - the enriched sets - aren't they 
basically just a subset of the complete fused set? What is the point 
of these, why would anyone prefer the Catalan release over the whole 
fused set? I am missing something here.


There are minor variations, but you could say it is a subset. However, 
the thing is called FlexiFusion for a reason. Chapters can choose how 
they want the data:


1. See Fig 2. the 'Rocket Ice' chart. One can safely assume that quality 
is better, if you choose the blue and green part only.


2. Chapters can easily tailor their ID space. So let's say they use 
their DBpedia language plus some well-linked, authorative national 
datasets and then enrich with everything else. We can tailor national 
information infrastructures with it.





- why would you load the English chapter into the main SPARQL endpoint 
instead of the fused set?


We are moving towards integration of LOD. So at some point is doesn't 
make sense to host ALL data in one place for free. Potentially, we can 
FlexiFuse anything with links like throw in Geonames, GND, 
WorldFactbook, MusicBrainz in the mix. If it gets really popular, there 
is no funding to add 10 or 100 servers to the cluster.


On the other hand, maybe you know some organisation who would donate big 
lump sums whenever 'free' hosting is at its limits due to a magnitude in 
request increase. This would make a lot of people very happy.


Otherwise it is free, unlimited dump downloads for self-hosting or paid 
dedicated hosting.




- in Table 2, the Fusion dataset boasts 66M entities over Wikidata's 
45M entities. Where do the 21M more entities come from? Shouldn't most 
of the individual Wikipedias' articles be already matched to Wikidata 
IDs and thus fused together?


Wikidata only has an ID, if the article exists in at least two 
languages. These are the singletons with no equivalent in other languages.





My understanding is that if I want to compare Wikidata to the fused 
dataset, I need to download both the mappings and the fused dataset, 
and then translate the latter using the former. Or is there some way 
for the databus to create me a fused dataset using Wikidata IDs 
("canonicalized", as it used to be called) instead of the new DBpedia 
IDs? I thought I read something like that in your previous answer, but 
I couldn't find that, and am now thinking of just doing it myself.


That sounds a lot like the enriched Wikidata. Yes, we can produce that. 
It would look like   "" .


Catalan is a prototype for now. All other sources will come soon, 
including Wikidata. Maybe, we will also produce a  URI 
datasets. You actually want the enriched Wikidata-DBpedia. There is no 
way to rewrite all 66M entities to WKD-URIs.


We also have two funded projects Energy-Databus and 
SupplyChainManagement-Databus, which will tackle bi-directional mappings 
of properties and classes. They start in August.


Note:

If you build something to remap properties and classes of the data, we 
would be happy, if you could share it via the Databus again: 
http://dev.dbpedia.org/Databus_Upload_User_Manual


Could also just be the reverse mapping, this is what we need. Or better 
we need infoboxes and their properties to Wikidata. So it would save us 
some work. Or you wait some months.





Finally, as Table 4 shows, the Fused dataset has an appreciable win 
of +2.16% over Wikidata on a property such as birth date. Would you 
consider publishing these diffs under a CC0 license so they could be 
provided to Wikidata for consideration and to enrich the source itself?


https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:Project/DBpedia/GlobalFactSyncRE 
-> WMF Grant to build the application to assist in this. I don't think 
we need to republish the dump. The app will hopefully have the 
references too and then it should be easy to import/sync. FlexiFusion 
was built with syncing Wikipedia and Wikidata in mind.


Getting traction here is the problem. How would you approach it? Can you 
mentor the project?


Cheers,

Sebastian




Cheers,
Denny



On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 10:48 PM Sebastian Hellmann 
> wrote:


Hi Denny,

On 03.06.19 23:31, Denny Vrandečić wrote:

Thank you a lot for the answer, that is super useful.

I'll see if I can get the canonicalized version recreated :)

One question though, is there a cleaned 

Re: [DBpedia-discussion] DBpedia download vs DBPedia SPARQL data

[Denny Vrandečić]

Thank you, I read now through the paper - great work, congratulations!

I am glad to see DBpedia evolve. I am very much looking forward to see it
move out of Beta.

I am also very glad (and quietly amused) to see you moving to opaque
identifiers. I think that is the right decision.

A few questions on the paper:

- the releases for the chapters - the enriched sets - aren't they basically
just a subset of the complete fused set? What is the point of these, why
would anyone prefer the Catalan release over the whole fused set? I am
missing something here.

- why would you load the English chapter into the main SPARQL endpoint
instead of the fused set?

- in Table 2, the Fusion dataset boasts 66M entities over Wikidata's 45M
entities. Where do the 21M more entities come from? Shouldn't most of the
individual Wikipedias' articles be already matched to Wikidata IDs and thus
fused together?

My understanding is that if I want to compare Wikidata to the fused
dataset, I need to download both the mappings and the fused dataset, and
then translate the latter using the former. Or is there some way for the
databus to create me a fused dataset using Wikidata IDs ("canonicalized",
as it used to be called) instead of the new DBpedia IDs? I thought I read
something like that in your previous answer, but I couldn't find that, and
am now thinking of just doing it myself.

Finally, as Table 4 shows, the Fused dataset has an appreciable win
of +2.16% over Wikidata on a property such as birth date. Would you
consider publishing these diffs under a CC0 license so they could be
provided to Wikidata for consideration and to enrich the source itself?

Cheers,
Denny



On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 10:48 PM Sebastian Hellmann <
hellm...@informatik.uni-leipzig.de> wrote:

> Hi Denny,
> On 03.06.19 23:31, Denny Vrandečić wrote:
>
> Thank you a lot for the answer, that is super useful.
>
> I'll see if I can get the canonicalized version recreated :)
>
> One question though, is there a cleaned version of the DBpedia ontology
> mapping based data? I only found the uncleaned version.
>
>
> Two scripts are missing: Type consistency check and Redirect resolution.
> We will do them after the Unicode bug.
>
>
> Do you have any plans when the next release of DBpedia is going to be
> available?
>
>
> These are signed with the public key from
> http://webid.dbpedia.org/webid.ttl so they are the next releases. The
> structure will stay the same and each release should be a bit better than
> the previous one. We are just working on the handful of issues and a better
> way to comment on mistakes before we announce them on all channels.
>
> It is an open platform now. We will have core dataset releases (including
> raw data) and then the community can create their own additions.
>
> https://propi.github.io/webid.ttl will add the LHD dataset and Heiko
> Paulheim DBkWik, etc.
>
> If you do any analysis, you can get an account and publish the data on the
> bus. Links like https://databus.dbpedia.org/denny/analysis are stable
> redirects to files, just like purl.org.
>
>
> -- Sebastian
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 2:19 PM Sebastian Hellmann <
> hellm...@informatik.uni-leipzig.de> wrote:
>
>> Hi Denny,
>>
>> you didn't find them really, because they are not yet publicly released.
>> Please see them as a beta.
>>
>> The main reason is, that there are a handful of missing features and a
>> handful of stupid bugs.
>>
>> One example:
>>
>> - we discovered a unicode issue in URIs which still allows valid
>> analysis, but would not allow to load it into dbpedia.org/sparql
>>
>> - we built the Databus to have a group changelog and a dataset/artifact
>> changelog, however, these can only be changed at release time, so we can
>> not update reported errors after it was published, like the one above.
>>
>> It is not hard and marvin did new extractions already:
>> https://databus.dbpedia.org/marvin , there is just a bit missing.
>>
>>
>> i.e. files such as
>> http://downloads.dbpedia.org/2016-10/core-i18n/de/mappingbased_objects_wkd_uris_de.ttl.bz2
>> - can you point me where I can find the canonicalized versions in the new
>> files?
>>
>>
>> These are discontinued. Instead there is:
>>
>> https://databus.dbpedia.org/dbpedia/id-management/global-ids loaded into
>> this webservice:
>> https://global.dbpedia.org/same-thing/lookup/?uri=http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q8087
>> where you can resolve many URIs against clusters.
>>
>> and the fused and enriched versions as described in
>> https://svn.aksw.org/papers/2019/ISWC_FlexiFusion/public.pdf
>>
>> Flexifusion is more systematic and can rewrite any datasetś subject with
>> any other subject from the ID management. So we could produce these
>> datasets any way.
>>
>>
>> Thanks for these pointers! I have run a few analyses, and now can rerun
>> them again with the actual current data :) I expect this to improve DBpedia
>> numbers by quite a bit.
>>
>> You could also try the fused version:
>> https://databus.dbpedia.or

Re: [DBpedia-discussion] DBpedia download vs DBPedia SPARQL data

[Sebastian Hellmann]

Hi Denny,

On 03.06.19 23:31, Denny Vrandečić wrote:

Thank you a lot for the answer, that is super useful.

I'll see if I can get the canonicalized version recreated :)

One question though, is there a cleaned version of the DBpedia 
ontology mapping based data? I only found the uncleaned version.



Two scripts are missing: Type consistency check and Redirect resolution. 
We will do them after the Unicode bug.




Do you have any plans when the next release of DBpedia is going to be 
available?



These are signed with the public key from 
http://webid.dbpedia.org/webid.ttl so they are the next releases. The 
structure will stay the same and each release should be a bit better 
than the previous one. We are just working on the handful of issues and 
a better way to comment on mistakes before we announce them on all 
channels.


It is an open platform now. We will have core dataset releases 
(including raw data) and then the community can create their own additions.


https://propi.github.io/webid.ttl will add the LHD dataset and Heiko 
Paulheim DBkWik, etc.


If you do any analysis, you can get an account and publish the data on 
the bus. Links like https://databus.dbpedia.org/denny/analysis are 
stable redirects to files, just like purl.org.



-- Sebastian







On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 2:19 PM Sebastian Hellmann 
> wrote:


Hi Denny,

you didn't find them really, because they are not yet publicly
released. Please see them as a beta.

The main reason is, that there are a handful of missing features
and a handful of stupid bugs.

One example:

- we discovered a unicode issue in URIs which still allows valid
analysis, but would not allow to load it into dbpedia.org/sparql


- we built the Databus to have a group changelog and a
dataset/artifact changelog, however, these can only be changed at
release time, so we can not update reported errors after it was
published, like the one above.

It is not hard and marvin did new extractions already:
https://databus.dbpedia.org/marvin , there is just a bit missing.



i.e. files such as

http://downloads.dbpedia.org/2016-10/core-i18n/de/mappingbased_objects_wkd_uris_de.ttl.bz2
- can you point me where I can find the canonicalized versions in
the new files?


These are discontinued. Instead there is:

https://databus.dbpedia.org/dbpedia/id-management/global-ids
loaded into this webservice:

https://global.dbpedia.org/same-thing/lookup/?uri=http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q8087
where you can resolve many URIs against clusters.

and the fused and enriched versions as described in
https://svn.aksw.org/papers/2019/ISWC_FlexiFusion/public.pdf

Flexifusion is more systematic and can rewrite any datasetś
subject with any other subject from the ID management. So we could
produce these datasets any way.



Thanks for these pointers! I have run a few analyses, and now can
rerun them again with the actual current data :) I expect this to
improve DBpedia numbers by quite a bit.

You could also try the fused version:
https://databus.dbpedia.org/dbpedia/fusion This is the one we are
working on most and will aggregate a lot more data in the future.



I find it all a bit hard to navigate (although Databus has a few
really neat features, thanks for that).


Any feedback welcome, the issue tracker is linked on top of the
website.


Yes, another missing feature. However, we thought that the pros
will just look at the dataid files and then write sparql queries
at https://databus.dbpedia.org/yasgui/

-- Sebastian


On 03.06.19 19:49, Denny Vrandečić wrote:

Oh, wow, thanks Sebastian, thanks Kingsley for the answers!

I was entirely unaware of the DBpedia datasets over at
databus.dbpedia.org  - when I search
for "dbpedia downloads" that's not where I get to. Also, when I
go to dbpedia.org  and then click on
"Downloads", I get to the 2016 datasets.

https://wiki.dbpedia.org/Datasets

https://wiki.dbpedia.org/develop/datasets

I honestly thought, that the 2016 dataset is the latest one, and
was rather disappointed. Thank you for showing me that I was just
looking in the wrong place - but I would really suggest that you
update your Websites to point to databus. I am sure I am not the
only one who believes that there has been no DBpedia update since
2016.

Thanks for these pointers! I have run a few analyses, and now can
rerun them again with the actual current data :) I expect this to
improve DBpedia numbers by quite a bit.

One question, I liked to use the canonicalized versions from here
https://wiki.dbpedia.org/downloads-2016-10, i.e. files such as

http://downloads.dbpedia.org/2016-10/core-i18n/de/mappingbased_objects_

Re: [DBpedia-discussion] DBpedia download vs DBPedia SPARQL data

[Denny Vrandečić]

Thank you a lot for the answer, that is super useful.

I'll see if I can get the canonicalized version recreated :)

One question though, is there a cleaned version of the DBpedia ontology
mapping based data? I only found the uncleaned version.

Do you have any plans when the next release of DBpedia is going to be
available?



On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 2:19 PM Sebastian Hellmann <
hellm...@informatik.uni-leipzig.de> wrote:

> Hi Denny,
>
> you didn't find them really, because they are not yet publicly released.
> Please see them as a beta.
>
> The main reason is, that there are a handful of missing features and a
> handful of stupid bugs.
>
> One example:
>
> - we discovered a unicode issue in URIs which still allows valid analysis,
> but would not allow to load it into dbpedia.org/sparql
>
> - we built the Databus to have a group changelog and a dataset/artifact
> changelog, however, these can only be changed at release time, so we can
> not update reported errors after it was published, like the one above.
>
> It is not hard and marvin did new extractions already:
> https://databus.dbpedia.org/marvin , there is just a bit missing.
>
>
> i.e. files such as
> http://downloads.dbpedia.org/2016-10/core-i18n/de/mappingbased_objects_wkd_uris_de.ttl.bz2
> - can you point me where I can find the canonicalized versions in the new
> files?
>
>
> These are discontinued. Instead there is:
>
> https://databus.dbpedia.org/dbpedia/id-management/global-ids loaded into
> this webservice:
> https://global.dbpedia.org/same-thing/lookup/?uri=http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q8087
> where you can resolve many URIs against clusters.
>
> and the fused and enriched versions as described in
> https://svn.aksw.org/papers/2019/ISWC_FlexiFusion/public.pdf
>
> Flexifusion is more systematic and can rewrite any datasetś subject with
> any other subject from the ID management. So we could produce these
> datasets any way.
>
>
> Thanks for these pointers! I have run a few analyses, and now can rerun
> them again with the actual current data :) I expect this to improve DBpedia
> numbers by quite a bit.
>
> You could also try the fused version:
> https://databus.dbpedia.org/dbpedia/fusion   This is the one we are
> working on most and will aggregate a lot more data in the future.
>
>
> I find it all a bit hard to navigate (although Databus has a few really
> neat features, thanks for that).
>
> Any feedback welcome, the issue tracker is linked on top of the website.
>
>
> Yes, another missing feature. However, we thought that the pros will just
> look at the dataid files and then write sparql queries at
> https://databus.dbpedia.org/yasgui/
>
> -- Sebastian
>
>
> On 03.06.19 19:49, Denny Vrandečić wrote:
>
> Oh, wow, thanks Sebastian, thanks Kingsley for the answers!
>
> I was entirely unaware of the DBpedia datasets over at databus.dbpedia.org
> - when I search for "dbpedia downloads" that's not where I get to. Also,
> when I go to dbpedia.org and then click on "Downloads", I get to the 2016
> datasets.
>
> https://wiki.dbpedia.org/Datasets
>
> https://wiki.dbpedia.org/develop/datasets
>
> I honestly thought, that the 2016 dataset is the latest one, and was
> rather disappointed. Thank you for showing me that I was just looking in
> the wrong place - but I would really suggest that you update your Websites
> to point to databus. I am sure I am not the only one who believes that
> there has been no DBpedia update since 2016.
>
> Thanks for these pointers! I have run a few analyses, and now can rerun
> them again with the actual current data :) I expect this to improve DBpedia
> numbers by quite a bit.
>
> One question, I liked to use the canonicalized versions from here
> https://wiki.dbpedia.org/downloads-2016-10, i.e. files such as
> http://downloads.dbpedia.org/2016-10/core-i18n/de/mappingbased_objects_wkd_uris_de.ttl.bz2
> - can you point me where I can find the canonicalized versions in the new
> files? I find it all a bit hard to navigate (although Databus has a few
> really neat features, thanks for that).
>
> Cheers,
> Denny
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 1, 2019 at 9:43 AM Kingsley Idehen 
> wrote:
>
>> On 6/1/19 5:45 AM, Sebastian Hellmann wrote:
>>
>> Hi Denny,
>>
>> * the old system was like this:
>>
>> we load from here: http://downloads.dbpedia.org/2016-10/core/
>>
>> metadata is in
>> http://downloads.dbpedia.org/2016-10/core/2016-10_dataid_core.ttl with
>> void:sparqlEndpoint 
>>  ;
>>
>>
>> Hi Sebastian,
>>
>>
>> I will also have the TTL referenced above loaded to a named graph so that
>> it becomes accessible from the query solution I shared in my prior post.
>>
>>
>>
>> * the new system is here: https://databus.dbpedia.org/dbpedia
>>
>> There are 6 new releases and the metadata is in the endpoint
>> https://databus.dbpedia.org/repo/sparql
>>
>> Once the collection saving feature  is finished, we will build a
>> collection of datasets on the bus, which will then be loaded. 

Re: [DBpedia-discussion] DBpedia download vs DBPedia SPARQL data

[Sebastian Hellmann]

Hi Denny,

you didn't find them really, because they are not yet publicly released. 
Please see them as a beta.


The main reason is, that there are a handful of missing features and a 
handful of stupid bugs.


One example:

- we discovered a unicode issue in URIs which still allows valid 
analysis, but would not allow to load it into dbpedia.org/sparql


- we built the Databus to have a group changelog and a dataset/artifact 
changelog, however, these can only be changed at release time, so we can 
not update reported errors after it was published, like the one above.


It is not hard and marvin did new extractions already: 
https://databus.dbpedia.org/marvin , there is just a bit missing.



i.e. files such as 
http://downloads.dbpedia.org/2016-10/core-i18n/de/mappingbased_objects_wkd_uris_de.ttl.bz2 
- can you point me where I can find the canonicalized versions in the 
new files?


These are discontinued. Instead there is:

https://databus.dbpedia.org/dbpedia/id-management/global-ids loaded into 
this webservice: 
https://global.dbpedia.org/same-thing/lookup/?uri=http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q8087 
where you can resolve many URIs against clusters.


and the fused and enriched versions as described in 
https://svn.aksw.org/papers/2019/ISWC_FlexiFusion/public.pdf


Flexifusion is more systematic and can rewrite any datasetś subject with 
any other subject from the ID management. So we could produce these 
datasets any way.



Thanks for these pointers! I have run a few analyses, and now can 
rerun them again with the actual current data :) I expect this to 
improve DBpedia numbers by quite a bit.
You could also try the fused version: 
https://databus.dbpedia.org/dbpedia/fusion   This is the one we are 
working on most and will aggregate a lot more data in the future.



I find it all a bit hard to navigate (although Databus has a few 
really neat features, thanks for that).


Any feedback welcome, the issue tracker is linked on top of the website.


Yes, another missing feature. However, we thought that the pros will 
just look at the dataid files and then write sparql queries at 
https://databus.dbpedia.org/yasgui/


-- Sebastian


On 03.06.19 19:49, Denny Vrandečić wrote:

Oh, wow, thanks Sebastian, thanks Kingsley for the answers!

I was entirely unaware of the DBpedia datasets over at 
databus.dbpedia.org  - when I search for 
"dbpedia downloads" that's not where I get to. Also, when I go to 
dbpedia.org  and then click on "Downloads", I get 
to the 2016 datasets.


https://wiki.dbpedia.org/Datasets

https://wiki.dbpedia.org/develop/datasets

I honestly thought, that the 2016 dataset is the latest one, and was 
rather disappointed. Thank you for showing me that I was just looking 
in the wrong place - but I would really suggest that you update your 
Websites to point to databus. I am sure I am not the only one who 
believes that there has been no DBpedia update since 2016.


Thanks for these pointers! I have run a few analyses, and now can 
rerun them again with the actual current data :) I expect this to 
improve DBpedia numbers by quite a bit.


One question, I liked to use the canonicalized versions from here 
https://wiki.dbpedia.org/downloads-2016-10, i.e. files such as 
http://downloads.dbpedia.org/2016-10/core-i18n/de/mappingbased_objects_wkd_uris_de.ttl.bz2 
- can you point me where I can find the canonicalized versions in the 
new files? I find it all a bit hard to navigate (although Databus has 
a few really neat features, thanks for that).


Cheers,
Denny





On Sat, Jun 1, 2019 at 9:43 AM Kingsley Idehen > wrote:


On 6/1/19 5:45 AM, Sebastian Hellmann wrote:


Hi Denny,

* the old system was like this:

we load from here: http://downloads.dbpedia.org/2016-10/core/

metadata is in
http://downloads.dbpedia.org/2016-10/core/2016-10_dataid_core.ttl
with void:sparqlEndpoint 
 ;



Hi Sebastian,


I will also have the TTL referenced above loaded to a named graph
so that it becomes accessible from the query solution I shared in
my prior post.




* the new system is here: https://databus.dbpedia.org/dbpedia

There are 6 new releases and the metadata is in the endpoint
https://databus.dbpedia.org/repo/sparql

Once the collection saving feature  is finished, we will build a
collection of datasets on the bus, which will then be loaded. It
is basically a sparql query retrieving the downloadurls like this:

http://dev.dbpedia.org/Data#example-application-virtuoso-docker



Okay.

Please install the Faceted Browser so that URIs like
http://dev.dbpedia.org/Data#example-application-virtuoso-docker
can also be looked up.

As an aside, here's an Entity Type overview query results page

Re: [DBpedia-discussion] DBpedia download vs DBPedia SPARQL data

[Denny Vrandečić]

(I did not yet find the time to read the paper, I am still doing so, maybe
the answer to my question is there, sorry if it is)

On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 10:49 AM Denny Vrandečić  wrote:

> Oh, wow, thanks Sebastian, thanks Kingsley for the answers!
>
> I was entirely unaware of the DBpedia datasets over at databus.dbpedia.org
> - when I search for "dbpedia downloads" that's not where I get to. Also,
> when I go to dbpedia.org and then click on "Downloads", I get to the 2016
> datasets.
>
> https://wiki.dbpedia.org/Datasets
>
> https://wiki.dbpedia.org/develop/datasets
>
> I honestly thought, that the 2016 dataset is the latest one, and was
> rather disappointed. Thank you for showing me that I was just looking in
> the wrong place - but I would really suggest that you update your Websites
> to point to databus. I am sure I am not the only one who believes that
> there has been no DBpedia update since 2016.
>
> Thanks for these pointers! I have run a few analyses, and now can rerun
> them again with the actual current data :) I expect this to improve DBpedia
> numbers by quite a bit.
>
> One question, I liked to use the canonicalized versions from here
> https://wiki.dbpedia.org/downloads-2016-10, i.e. files such as
> http://downloads.dbpedia.org/2016-10/core-i18n/de/mappingbased_objects_wkd_uris_de.ttl.bz2
> - can you point me where I can find the canonicalized versions in the new
> files? I find it all a bit hard to navigate (although Databus has a few
> really neat features, thanks for that).
>
> Cheers,
> Denny
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 1, 2019 at 9:43 AM Kingsley Idehen 
> wrote:
>
>> On 6/1/19 5:45 AM, Sebastian Hellmann wrote:
>>
>> Hi Denny,
>>
>> * the old system was like this:
>>
>> we load from here: http://downloads.dbpedia.org/2016-10/core/
>>
>> metadata is in
>> http://downloads.dbpedia.org/2016-10/core/2016-10_dataid_core.ttl with
>> void:sparqlEndpoint 
>>  ;
>>
>>
>> Hi Sebastian,
>>
>>
>> I will also have the TTL referenced above loaded to a named graph so that
>> it becomes accessible from the query solution I shared in my prior post.
>>
>>
>>
>> * the new system is here: https://databus.dbpedia.org/dbpedia
>>
>> There are 6 new releases and the metadata is in the endpoint
>> https://databus.dbpedia.org/repo/sparql
>>
>> Once the collection saving feature  is finished, we will build a
>> collection of datasets on the bus, which will then be loaded. It is
>> basically a sparql query retrieving the downloadurls like this:
>>
>> http://dev.dbpedia.org/Data#example-application-virtuoso-docker
>>
>>
>> Okay.
>>
>> Please install the Faceted Browser so that URIs like
>> http://dev.dbpedia.org/Data#example-application-virtuoso-docker can also
>> be looked up.
>>
>> As an aside, here's an Entity Type overview query results page
>> 
>> for future use etc..
>>
>>
>> Kingsley
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 31.05.19 21:59, Denny Vrandečić wrote:
>>
>> Thank you for the answer!
>>
>> I don't see how the query solution page that you linked indicates that
>> this is the English Wikipedia extraction. Where does it say that? How can I
>> tell? I am trying to understand, thanks.
>>
>> Also, when I download the set of English extractions from here,
>>
>> http://downloads.dbpedia.org/2016-10/core-i18n/en/
>>
>> particularly this one,
>>
>>
>> http://downloads.dbpedia.org/2016-10/core-i18n/en/mappingbased_objects_en.ttl.bz2
>>
>>
>> it is only about 17,467 people with parents, not 20,120, so that dataset
>> seems out of sync with the one in the SPARQL endpoint.
>>
>> I am curious where do you load the dataset from?
>>
>> Thank you!
>>
>>
>> On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 11:49 AM Kingsley Idehen 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 5/31/19 2:23 PM, Denny Vrandečić wrote:
>>>
>>> When I query the dbpedia.org/sparql endpoint asking for "how many
>>> people with a parent do you know?", i.e. select (count (distinct ?p) as ?c)
>>> where { ?s dbo:parent ?o }, I get as the answer 20,120.
>>>
>>> Where among the Downloads on wiki.dbpedia.org/downloads-2016-10 can I
>>> find the dataset that the SPARQL endpoint actually serves? Is it the
>>> English Wikipedia-based "Mappingbased" one? Or is t the "Infobox Properties
>>> Mapped"?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Denny
>>>
>>>
>>> The query solution page
>>> 

Re: [DBpedia-discussion] DBpedia download vs DBPedia SPARQL data

[Denny Vrandečić]

Oh, wow, thanks Sebastian, thanks Kingsley for the answers!

I was entirely unaware of the DBpedia datasets over at databus.dbpedia.org
- when I search for "dbpedia downloads" that's not where I get to. Also,
when I go to dbpedia.org and then click on "Downloads", I get to the 2016
datasets.

https://wiki.dbpedia.org/Datasets

https://wiki.dbpedia.org/develop/datasets

I honestly thought, that the 2016 dataset is the latest one, and was rather
disappointed. Thank you for showing me that I was just looking in the wrong
place - but I would really suggest that you update your Websites to point
to databus. I am sure I am not the only one who believes that there has
been no DBpedia update since 2016.

Thanks for these pointers! I have run a few analyses, and now can rerun
them again with the actual current data :) I expect this to improve DBpedia
numbers by quite a bit.

One question, I liked to use the canonicalized versions from here
https://wiki.dbpedia.org/downloads-2016-10, i.e. files such as
http://downloads.dbpedia.org/2016-10/core-i18n/de/mappingbased_objects_wkd_uris_de.ttl.bz2
- can you point me where I can find the canonicalized versions in the new
files? I find it all a bit hard to navigate (although Databus has a few
really neat features, thanks for that).

Cheers,
Denny





On Sat, Jun 1, 2019 at 9:43 AM Kingsley Idehen 
wrote:

> On 6/1/19 5:45 AM, Sebastian Hellmann wrote:
>
> Hi Denny,
>
> * the old system was like this:
>
> we load from here: http://downloads.dbpedia.org/2016-10/core/
>
> metadata is in
> http://downloads.dbpedia.org/2016-10/core/2016-10_dataid_core.ttl with
> void:sparqlEndpoint 
>  ;
>
>
> Hi Sebastian,
>
>
> I will also have the TTL referenced above loaded to a named graph so that
> it becomes accessible from the query solution I shared in my prior post.
>
>
>
> * the new system is here: https://databus.dbpedia.org/dbpedia
>
> There are 6 new releases and the metadata is in the endpoint
> https://databus.dbpedia.org/repo/sparql
>
> Once the collection saving feature  is finished, we will build a
> collection of datasets on the bus, which will then be loaded. It is
> basically a sparql query retrieving the downloadurls like this:
>
> http://dev.dbpedia.org/Data#example-application-virtuoso-docker
>
>
> Okay.
>
> Please install the Faceted Browser so that URIs like
> http://dev.dbpedia.org/Data#example-application-virtuoso-docker can also
> be looked up.
>
> As an aside, here's an Entity Type overview query results page
> 
> for future use etc..
>
>
> Kingsley
>
>
>
>
> On 31.05.19 21:59, Denny Vrandečić wrote:
>
> Thank you for the answer!
>
> I don't see how the query solution page that you linked indicates that
> this is the English Wikipedia extraction. Where does it say that? How can I
> tell? I am trying to understand, thanks.
>
> Also, when I download the set of English extractions from here,
>
> http://downloads.dbpedia.org/2016-10/core-i18n/en/
>
> particularly this one,
>
>
> http://downloads.dbpedia.org/2016-10/core-i18n/en/mappingbased_objects_en.ttl.bz2
>
>
> it is only about 17,467 people with parents, not 20,120, so that dataset
> seems out of sync with the one in the SPARQL endpoint.
>
> I am curious where do you load the dataset from?
>
> Thank you!
>
>
> On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 11:49 AM Kingsley Idehen 
> wrote:
>
>> On 5/31/19 2:23 PM, Denny Vrandečić wrote:
>>
>> When I query the dbpedia.org/sparql endpoint asking for "how many people
>> with a parent do you know?", i.e. select (count (distinct ?p) as ?c) where
>> { ?s dbo:parent ?o }, I get as the answer 20,120.
>>
>> Where among the Downloads on wiki.dbpedia.org/downloads-2016-10 can I
>> find the dataset that the SPARQL endpoint actually serves? Is it the
>> English Wikipedia-based "Mappingbased" one? Or is t the "Infobox Properties
>> Mapped"?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Denny
>>
>>
>> The query solution page
>> 
>> indicates this is the English Wikipedia dataset. That's what we've always
>> loaded into the Virtuoso instance from which DBpedia Linked Data and its
>> associated SPARQL endpoint are deployed.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Regards,

Re: [DBpedia-discussion] DBpedia download vs DBPedia SPARQL data

[Kingsley Idehen]

On 6/1/19 5:45 AM, Sebastian Hellmann wrote:
>
> Hi Denny,
>
> * the old system was like this:
>
> we load from here: http://downloads.dbpedia.org/2016-10/core/
>
> metadata is in
> http://downloads.dbpedia.org/2016-10/core/2016-10_dataid_core.ttl with
> void:sparqlEndpoint  ;
>

Hi Sebastian,


I will also have the TTL referenced above loaded to a named graph so
that it becomes accessible from the query solution I shared in my prior
post.


>
> * the new system is here: https://databus.dbpedia.org/dbpedia
>
> There are 6 new releases and the metadata is in the endpoint
> https://databus.dbpedia.org/repo/sparql
>
> Once the collection saving feature  is finished, we will build a
> collection of datasets on the bus, which will then be loaded. It is
> basically a sparql query retrieving the downloadurls like this:
>
> http://dev.dbpedia.org/Data#example-application-virtuoso-docker
>

Okay.

Please install the Faceted Browser so that URIs like
http://dev.dbpedia.org/Data#example-application-virtuoso-docker can also
be looked up.

As an aside, here's an Entity Type overview query results page

for future use etc..


Kingsley

>
>
>
> On 31.05.19 21:59, Denny Vrandečić wrote:
>> Thank you for the answer!
>>
>> I don't see how the query solution page that you linked indicates
>> that this is the English Wikipedia extraction. Where does it say
>> that? How can I tell? I am trying to understand, thanks.
>>
>> Also, when I download the set of English extractions from here,
>>
>> http://downloads.dbpedia.org/2016-10/core-i18n/en/ 
>>
>> particularly this one,
>>
>> http://downloads.dbpedia.org/2016-10/core-i18n/en/mappingbased_objects_en.ttl.bz2
>>  
>>
>> it is only about 17,467 people with parents, not 20,120, so that
>> dataset seems out of sync with the one in the SPARQL endpoint.
>>
>> I am curious where do you load the dataset from?
>>
>> Thank you!
>>
>>
>> On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 11:49 AM Kingsley Idehen
>> mailto:kide...@openlinksw.com>> wrote:
>>
>> On 5/31/19 2:23 PM, Denny Vrandečić wrote:
>>> When I query the dbpedia.org/sparql 
>>> endpoint asking for "how many people with a parent do you
>>> know?", i.e. select (count (distinct ?p) as ?c) where { ?s
>>> dbo:parent ?o }, I get as the answer 20,120.
>>>
>>> Where among the Downloads on wiki.dbpedia.org/downloads-2016-10
>>>  can I find the
>>> dataset that the SPARQL endpoint actually serves? Is it the
>>> English Wikipedia-based "Mappingbased" one? Or is t the "Infobox
>>> Properties Mapped"?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Denny
>>>
>>
>> The query solution page
>> 
>> 
>> indicates this is the English Wikipedia dataset. That's what
>> we've always loaded into the Virtuoso instance from which DBpedia
>> Linked Data and its associated SPARQL endpoint are deployed.
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Regards,
>>
>> Kingsley Idehen
>> Founder & CEO 
>> OpenLink Software   
>> Home Page: http://www.openlinksw.com
>> Community Support: https://community.openlinksw.com
>> Weblogs (Blogs):
>> Company Blog: https://medium.com/openlink-software-blog
>> Virtuoso Blog: https://medium.com/virtuoso-blog
>> Data Access Drivers Blog: 
>> https://medium.com/openlink-odbc-jdbc-ado-net-data-access-drivers
>>
>> Personal Weblogs (Blogs):
>> Medium Blog: https://medium.com/@kidehen
>> Legacy Blogs: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen/
>>   http://kidehen.blogspot.com
>>
>> Profile Pages:
>> Pinterest: https://www.pinterest.com/kidehen/
>> Quora: https://www.quora.com/profile/Kingsley-Uyi-Idehen
>> Twitter: https://twitter.com/kidehen
>> Google+: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about
>> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
>>
>> Web Identities (WebID):
>> Personal: http://kingsley.idehen.net/public_home/kidehen/profile.ttl#i
>> : 
>> http://id.myopenlink.net/DAV/home/KingsleyUyiIdehen/Public/kingsley.ttl#this
>>
>> ___
>> DB

Re: [DBpedia-discussion] DBpedia download vs DBPedia SPARQL data

[Sebastian Hellmann]

Hi Denny,

* the old system was like this:

we load from here: http://downloads.dbpedia.org/2016-10/core/

metadata is in 
http://downloads.dbpedia.org/2016-10/core/2016-10_dataid_core.ttl with 
void:sparqlEndpoint  ;



* the new system is here: https://databus.dbpedia.org/dbpedia

There are 6 new releases and the metadata is in the endpoint 
https://databus.dbpedia.org/repo/sparql


Once the collection saving feature  is finished, we will build a 
collection of datasets on the bus, which will then be loaded. It is 
basically a sparql query retrieving the downloadurls like this:


http://dev.dbpedia.org/Data#example-application-virtuoso-docker


So we keep better usage tracing and also better provenance tracking, 
i.e. we hope that the wikidata/wikipedia dumps will be on the databus, 
so we can set prov-o:wasDerivedFrom links.



By the way there is a new fusion dataset: 
https://svn.aksw.org/papers/2019/ISWC_FlexiFusion/public.pdf


So people don need to merge Wikidata and DBpedia manually any more. It 
is prefused.



-- Sebastian



On 31.05.19 21:59, Denny Vrandečić wrote:

Thank you for the answer!

I don't see how the query solution page that you linked indicates that 
this is the English Wikipedia extraction. Where does it say that? How 
can I tell? I am trying to understand, thanks.


Also, when I download the set of English extractions from here,

http://downloads.dbpedia.org/2016-10/core-i18n/en/

particularly this one,

http://downloads.dbpedia.org/2016-10/core-i18n/en/mappingbased_objects_en.ttl.bz2 



it is only about 17,467 people with parents, not 20,120, so that 
dataset seems out of sync with the one in the SPARQL endpoint.


I am curious where do you load the dataset from?

Thank you!


On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 11:49 AM Kingsley Idehen 
mailto:kide...@openlinksw.com>> wrote:


On 5/31/19 2:23 PM, Denny Vrandečić wrote:

When I query the dbpedia.org/sparql 
endpoint asking for "how many people with a parent do you know?",
i.e. select (count (distinct ?p) as ?c) where { ?s dbo:parent ?o
}, I get as the answer 20,120.

Where among the Downloads on wiki.dbpedia.org/downloads-2016-10
 can I find the
dataset that the SPARQL endpoint actually serves? Is it the
English Wikipedia-based "Mappingbased" one? Or is t the "Infobox
Properties Mapped"?

Cheers,
Denny



The query solution page


indicates this is the English Wikipedia dataset. That's what we've
always loaded into the Virtuoso instance from which DBpedia Linked
Data and its associated SPARQL endpoint are deployed.


-- 
Regards,


Kingsley Idehen 
Founder & CEO
OpenLink Software
Home Page:http://www.openlinksw.com
Community Support:https://community.openlinksw.com
Weblogs (Blogs):
Company Blog:https://medium.com/openlink-software-blog
Virtuoso Blog:https://medium.com/virtuoso-blog
Data Access Drivers 
Blog:https://medium.com/openlink-odbc-jdbc-ado-net-data-access-drivers

Personal Weblogs (Blogs):
Medium Blog:https://medium.com/@kidehen
Legacy Blogs:http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen/
   http://kidehen.blogspot.com

Profile Pages:
Pinterest:https://www.pinterest.com/kidehen/
Quora:https://www.quora.com/profile/Kingsley-Uyi-Idehen
Twitter:https://twitter.com/kidehen
Google+:https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about
LinkedIn:http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen

Web Identities (WebID):
Personal:http://kingsley.idehen.net/public_home/kidehen/profile.ttl#i
 
:http://id.myopenlink.net/DAV/home/KingsleyUyiIdehen/Public/kingsley.ttl#this

___
DBpedia-discussion mailing list
DBpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net

https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion



___
DBpedia-discussion mailing list
DBpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion

--
All the best,
Sebastian Hellmann

Director of Knowledge Integration and Linked Data Technologies (KILT) 
Competence Center

at the Institute for Applied Informatics (InfAI) at Leipzig University
Executive Director of the DBpedia Association
Projects: http://dbpedia.org, http://nlp2rdf.org, 
http://linguistics.okfn.org, https://www.w3.org/community/ld4lt 

Re: [DBpedia-discussion] DBpedia download vs DBPedia SPARQL data

[Kingsley Idehen]

On 5/31/19 3:59 PM, Denny Vrandečić wrote:
> Thank you for the answer!
>
> I don't see how the query solution page that you linked indicates that
> this is the English Wikipedia extraction. Where does it say that? How
> can I tell? I am trying to understand, thanks.


My query solution includes the named graph IRI as part of the select
list output.

There isn't any additional information triangulating from the named
graph IRI to datasets loaded into said named graph.

We could add this information as I think its quite useful, especially
bearing in mind your example.

I will check with my team about the loaded dataset details. Ditto
looking into how we can add some additional metadata to the instance etc..

Thanks!


Kingsley


>
> Also, when I download the set of English extractions from here,
>
> http://downloads.dbpedia.org/2016-10/core-i18n/en/ 
>
> particularly this one,
>
> http://downloads.dbpedia.org/2016-10/core-i18n/en/mappingbased_objects_en.ttl.bz2
>  
>
> it is only about 17,467 people with parents, not 20,120, so that
> dataset seems out of sync with the one in the SPARQL endpoint.
>
> I am curious where do you load the dataset from?
>
> Thank you!
>
>
> On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 11:49 AM Kingsley Idehen
> mailto:kide...@openlinksw.com>> wrote:
>
> On 5/31/19 2:23 PM, Denny Vrandečić wrote:
>> When I query the dbpedia.org/sparql 
>> endpoint asking for "how many people with a parent do you know?",
>> i.e. select (count (distinct ?p) as ?c) where { ?s dbo:parent ?o
>> }, I get as the answer 20,120.
>>
>> Where among the Downloads on wiki.dbpedia.org/downloads-2016-10
>>  can I find the
>> dataset that the SPARQL endpoint actually serves? Is it the
>> English Wikipedia-based "Mappingbased" one? Or is t the "Infobox
>> Properties Mapped"?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Denny
>>
>
> The query solution page
> 
> 
> indicates this is the English Wikipedia dataset. That's what we've
> always loaded into the Virtuoso instance from which DBpedia Linked
> Data and its associated SPARQL endpoint are deployed.
>
>
> -- 
> Regards,
>
> Kingsley Idehen 
> Founder & CEO 
> OpenLink Software   
> Home Page: http://www.openlinksw.com
> Community Support: https://community.openlinksw.com
> Weblogs (Blogs):
> Company Blog: https://medium.com/openlink-software-blog
> Virtuoso Blog: https://medium.com/virtuoso-blog
> Data Access Drivers Blog: 
> https://medium.com/openlink-odbc-jdbc-ado-net-data-access-drivers
>
> Personal Weblogs (Blogs):
> Medium Blog: https://medium.com/@kidehen
> Legacy Blogs: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen/
>   http://kidehen.blogspot.com
>
> Profile Pages:
> Pinterest: https://www.pinterest.com/kidehen/
> Quora: https://www.quora.com/profile/Kingsley-Uyi-Idehen
> Twitter: https://twitter.com/kidehen
> Google+: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about
> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
>
> Web Identities (WebID):
> Personal: http://kingsley.idehen.net/public_home/kidehen/profile.ttl#i
> : 
> http://id.myopenlink.net/DAV/home/KingsleyUyiIdehen/Public/kingsley.ttl#this
>
> ___
> DBpedia-discussion mailing list
> DBpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
> 
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion
>

-- 
Regards,

Kingsley Idehen   
Founder & CEO 
OpenLink Software   
Home Page: http://www.openlinksw.com
Community Support: https://community.openlinksw.com
Weblogs (Blogs):
Company Blog: https://medium.com/openlink-software-blog
Virtuoso Blog: https://medium.com/virtuoso-blog
Data Access Drivers Blog: 
https://medium.com/openlink-odbc-jdbc-ado-net-data-access-drivers

Personal Weblogs (Blogs):
Medium Blog: https://medium.com/@kidehen
Legacy Blogs: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen/
  http://kidehen.blogspot.com

Profile Pages:
Pinterest: https://www.pinterest.com/kidehen/
Quora: https://www.quora.com/profile/Kingsley-Uyi-Idehen
Twitter: https://twitter.com/kidehen
Google+: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen

Web Identities (WebID):
Personal: http://kingsley.idehen.net/public_home/kidehen/profile.ttl#i
: 
http://id.myopenlink.net/DAV/home/KingsleyUyiIdehen/Public/kingsley.ttl#this



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryp

Re: [DBpedia-discussion] DBpedia download vs DBPedia SPARQL data

[Denny Vrandečić]

Thank you for the answer!

I don't see how the query solution page that you linked indicates that this
is the English Wikipedia extraction. Where does it say that? How can I
tell? I am trying to understand, thanks.

Also, when I download the set of English extractions from here,

http://downloads.dbpedia.org/2016-10/core-i18n/en/

particularly this one,

http://downloads.dbpedia.org/2016-10/core-i18n/en/mappingbased_objects_en.ttl.bz2


it is only about 17,467 people with parents, not 20,120, so that dataset
seems out of sync with the one in the SPARQL endpoint.

I am curious where do you load the dataset from?

Thank you!


On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 11:49 AM Kingsley Idehen 
wrote:

> On 5/31/19 2:23 PM, Denny Vrandečić wrote:
>
> When I query the dbpedia.org/sparql endpoint asking for "how many people
> with a parent do you know?", i.e. select (count (distinct ?p) as ?c) where
> { ?s dbo:parent ?o }, I get as the answer 20,120.
>
> Where among the Downloads on wiki.dbpedia.org/downloads-2016-10 can I
> find the dataset that the SPARQL endpoint actually serves? Is it the
> English Wikipedia-based "Mappingbased" one? Or is t the "Infobox Properties
> Mapped"?
>
> Cheers,
> Denny
>
>
> The query solution page
> 
> indicates this is the English Wikipedia dataset. That's what we've always
> loaded into the Virtuoso instance from which DBpedia Linked Data and its
> associated SPARQL endpoint are deployed.
>
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Kingsley Idehen   
> Founder & CEO
> OpenLink Software
> Home Page: http://www.openlinksw.com
> Community Support: https://community.openlinksw.com
> Weblogs (Blogs):
> Company Blog: https://medium.com/openlink-software-blog
> Virtuoso Blog: https://medium.com/virtuoso-blog
> Data Access Drivers Blog: 
> https://medium.com/openlink-odbc-jdbc-ado-net-data-access-drivers
>
> Personal Weblogs (Blogs):
> Medium Blog: https://medium.com/@kidehen
> Legacy Blogs: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen/
>   http://kidehen.blogspot.com
>
> Profile Pages:
> Pinterest: https://www.pinterest.com/kidehen/
> Quora: https://www.quora.com/profile/Kingsley-Uyi-Idehen
> Twitter: https://twitter.com/kidehen
> Google+: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about
> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
>
> Web Identities (WebID):
> Personal: http://kingsley.idehen.net/public_home/kidehen/profile.ttl#i
> : 
> http://id.myopenlink.net/DAV/home/KingsleyUyiIdehen/Public/kingsley.ttl#this
>
> ___
> DBpedia-discussion mailing list
> DBpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion
>
___
DBpedia-discussion mailing list
DBpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion

Re: [DBpedia-discussion] DBpedia download vs DBPedia SPARQL data

[Kingsley Idehen]

On 5/31/19 2:23 PM, Denny Vrandečić wrote:
> When I query the dbpedia.org/sparql 
> endpoint asking for "how many people with a parent do you know?", i.e.
> select (count (distinct ?p) as ?c) where { ?s dbo:parent ?o }, I get
> as the answer 20,120.
>
> Where among the Downloads on wiki.dbpedia.org/downloads-2016-10
>  can I find the dataset
> that the SPARQL endpoint actually serves? Is it the English
> Wikipedia-based "Mappingbased" one? Or is t the "Infobox Properties
> Mapped"?
>
> Cheers,
> Denny
>

The query solution page

indicates this is the English Wikipedia dataset. That's what we've
always loaded into the Virtuoso instance from which DBpedia Linked Data
and its associated SPARQL endpoint are deployed.


-- 
Regards,

Kingsley Idehen   
Founder & CEO 
OpenLink Software   
Home Page: http://www.openlinksw.com
Community Support: https://community.openlinksw.com
Weblogs (Blogs):
Company Blog: https://medium.com/openlink-software-blog
Virtuoso Blog: https://medium.com/virtuoso-blog
Data Access Drivers Blog: 
https://medium.com/openlink-odbc-jdbc-ado-net-data-access-drivers

Personal Weblogs (Blogs):
Medium Blog: https://medium.com/@kidehen
Legacy Blogs: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen/
  http://kidehen.blogspot.com

Profile Pages:
Pinterest: https://www.pinterest.com/kidehen/
Quora: https://www.quora.com/profile/Kingsley-Uyi-Idehen
Twitter: https://twitter.com/kidehen
Google+: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen

Web Identities (WebID):
Personal: http://kingsley.idehen.net/public_home/kidehen/profile.ttl#i
: 
http://id.myopenlink.net/DAV/home/KingsleyUyiIdehen/Public/kingsley.ttl#this



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
___
DBpedia-discussion mailing list
DBpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion