Re: problema driver flash memory card

2003-09-08 Thread Francesco P. Lovergine
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 04:29:11PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Qualcuno mi potrebbe cortesemente spiegare perchè alcuni driver per la gestione di flash memory card in PCMCIA sviluppati in kernel-image-2.2.20 non sono più presenti nei kernel successivi? Sul mio portatile ho installato il

Re: debian/ et upstream

2003-09-08 Thread Michael Scherer
Bonjour On Monday 08 September 2003 09:57, Georges Mariano wrote: On Mon, 8 Sep 2003 09:57:40 +0200 Xavier Roche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Autre argument: votre application n'est pas specifique a Debian, donc mettre le repertoire debian/ ne va pas aider les empaqueteurs d'autres

Re: apache2 php4 and all folk

2003-09-08 Thread Bertrand PERRINE
J'ai réalisé quelques paquets php4 avec apache2 sous debian woody. J'ai utilisé un retroportage du paquet apache2 et j'ai inclus une dépendance sur mpm-prefork en raison d'extensions PHP ne supportant pas les threads. A noter qu'APXS est configuré en support thread. Pour lever cela, il faut

Re: debian/ et upstream

2003-09-08 Thread Georges Mariano
Tous ça pour dire que même entre fichiers .deb il peut y avoir des problèmes si ils ne font pas parti de la même distribution, homogène et suivant des règles communes. Ben c'est quand même prévisible, non ? du temps où j'utilisais du Ximian, ça marchait bien. Évidemmment, je _savais_ qu'en

Re: debian/ et upstream

2003-09-08 Thread Georges Mariano
Selon Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]: soudain impossible (il existe des ajustements plus lourds que 'mv debian debian.upstram')? Ca pollue le .diff.gz et rend les choses plus difficile pour le mainteneur. hmm, oui, tiens... à quel moment le diff.gz entre-t-il dans la danse ? il n'est

Re: debian/ et upstream

2003-09-08 Thread Sven Luther
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 08:33:30PM +0200, Georges Mariano wrote: Tous ça pour dire que même entre fichiers .deb il peut y avoir des problèmes si ils ne font pas parti de la même distribution, homogène et suivant des règles communes. Ben c'est quand même prévisible, non ? du temps où

Re: IMPORTANT: your message to html-tidy

2003-09-08 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 04:26:57PM -0700, Joshua Kwan wrote: On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 06:40:46PM -0400, W3C List Manager wrote: This is a response to a message apparently sent from your address to [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Subject: Re: Thank you! From:debian-devel@lists.debian.org

[no subject]

2003-09-08 Thread Justin Delaporte
hay u suck u faget u lick dick suck yr mu

is your /usr/share/info/dir in perfect shape?

2003-09-08 Thread Dan Jacobson
Gentlemen, the Info dir on my system is not in tip top shape, and may not be also on yours. Try this simple test for duplicate entries: $ sort /usr/share/info/dir|uniq -d|fgrep \* * patch: (diff)Invoking patch. Apply a patch to a file. * sdiff: (diff)Invoking sdiff.

Single point of entry for translation work?

2003-09-08 Thread Matthew Palmer
Is there a page somewhere that I can point people to for all translation work relating to Debian (DDTS, po-debconf, etc)? Just trying to make the debian-mentors FAQ as useful as possible... - Matt

Re: IMPORTANT: your message to html-tidy

2003-09-08 Thread Karsten M. Self
on Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 01:57:54PM +1000, Matthew Palmer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 04:26:57PM -0700, Joshua Kwan wrote: On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 06:40:46PM -0400, W3C List Manager wrote: This is a response to a message apparently sent from your address to [EMAIL

Re: IMPORTANT: your message to html-tidy

2003-09-08 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 06:04:39AM +0100, Karsten M. Self wrote: on Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 01:57:54PM +1000, Matthew Palmer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: [W3C's autoresponder] This one's a bit different. It's only asking for permission to archive posts to the list - I guess W3C's just trying,

Re: IMPORTANT: your message to html-tidy

2003-09-08 Thread Steve Lamb
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003 15:40:15 +1000 Matthew Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 06:04:39AM +0100, Karsten M. Self wrote: I'm coming to the view that we're approaching the era where all mail is going to have to be subject to filtering, at the MTA level. Depends on how

Re: ruby-defaults 1.8.0

2003-09-08 Thread Matthias Klose
Fumitoshi UKAI writes: Hi, ruby package maintainers! I've upload new ruby-defaults that make ruby 1.8.0 the debault version of ruby. I contains some new binary package so it takes time to get into unstable. You can get the new ruby-defaults from deb

installer for non-free packages in contrib

2003-09-08 Thread Mathieu Roy
Hi, I did not noticed clear answer about my proposal about the non-free software installer in contrib. Would it be acceptable to fill a bug against each installer that do not build a proper debian package when installing non-free software? If so, which severity is appropriate? I do not think

Bug#209178: ITP: jamin -- Audio mastering from a mixed down multitrack source with JACK

2003-09-08 Thread Robert Jordens
Package: wnpp Version: unavailable; reported 2003-09-08 Severity: wishlist * Package name: jamin Version : 0.5.12+cvs030908 Upstream Author : Steve Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://jamin.sourceforge.net * License : GPL Description : Audio mastering

Re: Single point of entry for translation work?

2003-09-08 Thread Krzysztof Krzyzaniak
W licie z pon, 08-09-2003, godz. 06:41, Matthew Palmer pisze: Is there a page somewhere that I can point people to for all translation work relating to Debian (DDTS, po-debconf, etc)? Just trying to make the debian-mentors FAQ as useful as possible... Take look at http://ddtp.debian.org/

Re: tmda: Challenge-response is fundamentally broken (RAPNAP)

2003-09-08 Thread Craig Sanders
On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 11:32:04PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote: DNSBL's and spamassasin seem quite good at dealing with spam and are much less annoying. That combined with some new laws that are being enacted to combat spam should keep it to a managable level. oh, please tell me that these new

translations and the ddtp

2003-09-08 Thread Martin Quinson
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 11:21:18AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: Op vr 05-09-2003, om 09:16 schreef Martin Quinson: On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 10:44:08PM -0700, Joshua Kwan wrote: On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 07:15:57AM +0200, Martin Godisch wrote: Are these actually used somewhere? If I switch

Re: /etc/shells management

2003-09-08 Thread Branden Robinson
On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 06:59:18PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 11:58:03AM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote: On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 06:08:06PM +0200, Thomas Hood wrote: On Sun, 2003-09-07 at 17:23, Branden Robinson wrote: Man, that's ugly. I use: if [ -n $var

Re: Single point of entry for translation work?

2003-09-08 Thread Mark Brown
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 10:17:45AM +0200, Krzysztof Krzyzaniak wrote: W li?cie z pon, 08-09-2003, godz. 06:41, Matthew Palmer pisze: Is there a page somewhere that I can point people to for all translation work relating to Debian (DDTS, po-debconf, etc)? Just trying to make the

Re: /etc/shells management

2003-09-08 Thread Branden Robinson
Sorry to give offense, Manoj. I should have grepped the whole chapter before wondering about unknown, and I should have mentioned that I really just use section 6.4 most of the time (because I *think* I remember what each of the cases are for). The fact that a non-version-number string literal

Re: /etc/shells management

2003-09-08 Thread Branden Robinson
On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 09:42:40PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 10:23:15AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: Where did you come by this, and if it's something we should worry about, why isn't it documented in Policy? It is, but you shouldn't worry about it anyhow because

Re: installer for non-free packages in contrib

2003-09-08 Thread Branden Robinson
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 09:35:45AM +0200, Mathieu Roy wrote: I did not noticed clear answer about my proposal about the non-free software installer in contrib. It might help if you posted a summary of the thread. Would it be acceptable to fill a bug against each installer that do not build a

Re: Single point of entry for translation work?

2003-09-08 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 10:17:45AM +0200, Krzysztof Krzyzaniak wrote: W li?cie z pon, 08-09-2003, godz. 06:41, Matthew Palmer pisze: Is there a page somewhere that I can point people to for all translation work relating to Debian (DDTS, po-debconf, etc)? Just trying to make the

Re: Single point of entry for translation work?

2003-09-08 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 02:41:14PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote: Is there a page somewhere that I can point people to for all translation work relating to Debian (DDTS, po-debconf, etc)? Just trying to make the debian-mentors FAQ as useful as possible... Normally the contact persons and

Re: /etc/shells management

2003-09-08 Thread Andreas Metzler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] The fact that a non-version-number string literal with shell redirection operators in it was a valid value of old-version, new-version, most-recently-configured-version, and so forth, did not occur to

Re: Single point of entry for translation work?

2003-09-08 Thread Andreas Metzler
Matthew Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 10:17:45AM +0200, Krzysztof Krzyzaniak wrote: W li?cie z pon, 08-09-2003, godz. 06:41, Matthew Palmer pisze: Is there a page somewhere that I can point people to for all translation work relating to Debian (DDTS, po-debconf,

Re: /etc/shells management

2003-09-08 Thread Colin Watson
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 03:42:06AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 06:59:18PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 11:58:03AM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote: In general, no. If the contents of $var are a test operator, you'll get a syntax error.

Re: installer for non-free packages in contrib

2003-09-08 Thread Colin Watson
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 09:35:45AM +0200, Mathieu Roy wrote: Would it be acceptable to fill a bug against each installer that do not build a proper debian package when installing non-free software? How can they do so? Installing a package with 'dpkg -i' in the postinst of another package isn't

Re: Single point of entry for translation work?

2003-09-08 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 11:21:00AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: Matthew Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 10:17:45AM +0200, Krzysztof Krzyzaniak wrote: W li?cie z pon, 08-09-2003, godz. 06:41, Matthew Palmer pisze: Is there a page somewhere that I can point people to

Re: installer for non-free packages in contrib

2003-09-08 Thread Mathieu Roy
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] a tapoté : On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 09:35:45AM +0200, Mathieu Roy wrote: Would it be acceptable to fill a bug against each installer that do not build a proper debian package when installing non-free software? How can they do so? Installing a package with

Re: installer for non-free packages in contrib

2003-09-08 Thread Colin Watson
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 01:08:34PM +0200, Mathieu Roy wrote: Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] a tapot? : On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 09:35:45AM +0200, Mathieu Roy wrote: Would it be acceptable to fill a bug against each installer that do not build a proper debian package when installing

Re: /etc/shells management

2003-09-08 Thread Nicolas François
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 03:48:37AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: I do continue to think that: if [ -n $var ] is more readable than if [ ${var+set} = set ] both are not equivalent: the first one test if var is empty or unset the second one test if var is unset with bash: $ a=1 ;

Re: /etc/shells management

2003-09-08 Thread Josip Rodin
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 03:50:38AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: Where did you come by this, and if it's something we should worry about, why isn't it documented in Policy? It is, but you shouldn't worry about it anyhow because nobody's crazy enough to try doing anything with a dpkg

Mesajiniz Alinmistir...

2003-09-08 Thread Kral Ferdi Tayfur Online
Merhabalar, Mesajiniz bize ulasmistir. En kisa zamanda geregi yapilacaktir. Saygilar, www.KralFerdiTayfur.com

Draw font with different size

2003-09-08 Thread Tomas Kratochvil
Hello, could you help me, please. I wrote X aplication which draw text into window. How could I draw text with different font size? I`m able only use fonts which are in font.aliases. And I want to draw text with size 50, 54, 60,... // this way I do it now. // init font font1 =

debian menu system and capital letters

2003-09-08 Thread Jonathan Dowland
Hi all, A small annoyance I have with debian's menu system is an inconsistency in the naming of programs on the menus: Apps/Tools ASclock EditRes Oclock ... bbpager docker ... The ordering of the menu is dictated by the menu system rather

Re: unrebuildable ruby packages (Re: ruby-defaults 1.8.0)

2003-09-08 Thread Fumitoshi UKAI
At Sun, 7 Sep 2003 15:20:09 -0400, Joey Hess wrote: I'm probably the only ruby package maintainer who doesn't speak ruby.. :-) Luckily I have eager ruby minions to take care of that part of mooix. However, we were a bit suprised to have to make the configure script check for

Bug#209214: ITP: hbf -- A 3D real time strategy game based in an Heroic Fantasy realm with different races

2003-09-08 Thread Julien Danjou
Package: wnpp Version: unavailable; reported 2003-09-08 Severity: wishlist * Package name: hbf Version : Not yet released (CVS only) Upstream Author : Boris Lesner [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://hbf.tuxfamily.org * License : GPL Description : A 3D real

Re: ruby-defaults 1.8.0

2003-09-08 Thread Fumitoshi UKAI
At Mon, 8 Sep 2003 08:19:14 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: I've upload new ruby-defaults that make ruby 1.8.0 the debault version of ruby. I contains some new binary package so it takes time to get into unstable. You can get the new ruby-defaults from deb

erratic autoconf emacsen-common bug

2003-09-08 Thread Camm Maguire
Greetings! This turned up recently in autobuilding gcl: Setting up autoconf (2.57-10) ... ERROR: emacsen-common being used before being configured. ERROR: This is likely a bug in the autoconf package, which needs to ERROR: add one of the appropriate dependencies. ERROR: See

Re: /etc/shells management

2003-09-08 Thread Steve Greenland
On 08-Sep-03, 03:42 (CDT), Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I personally stongly advocate -n and -z over [ $var ] and really horrible tests like: if [ x$var = x ] and if [ x$var != x ] Those just strike me as obscurantist (which might explain why they feature prominently in

Re: Single point of entry for translation work?

2003-09-08 Thread Martin Quinson
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 07:29:27PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote: On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 11:21:00AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: Matthew Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 10:17:45AM +0200, Krzysztof Krzyzaniak wrote: W li?cie z pon, 08-09-2003, godz. 06:41, Matthew

Re: debian menu system and capital letters

2003-09-08 Thread Jason Chambers
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 02:45:49PM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote: Hi all, A small annoyance I have with debian's menu system is an inconsistency in the naming of programs on the menus: Apps/Tools ASclock EditRes Oclock ... bbpager

Re: /etc/shells management

2003-09-08 Thread Branden Robinson
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 10:10:34AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 03:42:06AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: But if $var contains more than one shell word... You might get different results dependening on whether you remember to quote the shell variable or not.

Re: /etc/shells management

2003-09-08 Thread Branden Robinson
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 11:11:34AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: I do continue to think that: if [ -n $var ] is more readable than if [ ${var+set} = set ] I agree, but usually use »[ x${var} != x ]« for no particular reason but the fact that when reading it later I can discern

Re: ruby-defaults 1.8.0

2003-09-08 Thread Branden Robinson
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 11:16:51PM +0900, Fumitoshi UKAI wrote: Oh, I didn't notice that powerpc buildd failed to build ruby1.8. However, I've successfully build ruby1.8 in pure sid environment on my friend's powerpc machine. I suspect the reason why ruby1.8 failed to be built is that

Security Reseller Application - Invitation

2003-09-08 Thread Secure IT Systems Ltd
Secure IT Systems are a leading UK based manufacturer of Physical Computer Security systems. You are invited you to become an approved reseller of the popular Proline range ( see link below ) of computer security systems. As a reseller you have... •

Re: /etc/shells management

2003-09-08 Thread Bob Proulx
Branden Robinson wrote: test -n and -z exist for a reason, even if one has to come up with pretty dodgy mnemonics for remembering them. -n Nonzero size string -z Zero size string Dodgy mnemonics? I find them very mnemonic! Bob pgpJpoX4Xwb2h.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: /etc/shells management

2003-09-08 Thread Bob Proulx
Branden Robinson wrote: I don't defend test(1) as a miracle of clarity, though. -h is a synonym for -L. Go figure. :-/ I think you can blame BSD for that one. IIRC test -h was the original option used to test for a symlink. Whoever wrote that test probably did not like upper case letters

Re: /etc/shells management

2003-09-08 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003 03:48:37 -0500, Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: I do continue to think that: if [ -n $var ] is more readable than if [ ${var+set} = set ] ...but I remain open to being directed to a section of the Policy manual that firmly establishes my wrongness on that

Re: installer for non-free packages in contrib

2003-09-08 Thread Mathieu Roy
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] a tapoté : On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 01:08:34PM +0200, Mathieu Roy wrote: Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] a tapot? : On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 09:35:45AM +0200, Mathieu Roy wrote: Would it be acceptable to fill a bug against each installer that do not build

Re: /etc/shells management

2003-09-08 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Mon, 08 Sep 2003 11:11:34 +0200, Andreas Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] The fact that a non-version-number string literal with shell redirection operators in it was a valid value of old-version, new-version,

Re: /etc/shells management

2003-09-08 Thread Colin Watson
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 10:14:46AM -0600, Bob Proulx wrote: Today I can't find a system that does not implement 'test -L'. Solaris' /bin/sh didn't do so at least up to 2.9. Of course, it's not a POSIX shell in other ways anyway: for example, the lack of 'test -e' is far more annoying and harder

Re: /etc/shells management

2003-09-08 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi, [I apologize for following up to this mail a second time;; I should not post before I have had coffee] On Mon, 8 Sep 2003 03:48:37 -0500, Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: I do continue to think that: if [ -n $var ] is more readable than if [ ${var+set} = set

Bug 70132 (on atari-fdisk)

2003-09-08 Thread Gunnar Wolf
This is a very old FTBFS bug (28 Aug 2000), which was closed in 23 Aug 2003 and reopened in 3 Sep 2003. After this, Frank Lichtenheld comments: Hi. I verified that it builds correctly with an added Build-Depends to debhelper. But before producing a NMU patch I wonder if this package

Re: installer for non-free packages in contrib

2003-09-08 Thread Colin Watson
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 06:42:46PM +0200, Mathieu Roy wrote: [Please stop sending me private copies of list mail.] Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] a tapot? : On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 01:08:34PM +0200, Mathieu Roy wrote: Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] a tapot? : On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at

Re: debian menu system and capital letters

2003-09-08 Thread Jonathan Dowland
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 04:10:20PM +0100, Jason Chambers wrote: You can get the case ignored when ordering by adding the following to /etc/menu-methods/menu.h. sort=tolower($title) Then run update-menus to regenerate them. I've had a play around with this, and found that putting a

Re: Bug 70132 (on atari-fdisk)

2003-09-08 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 12:01:39PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote: This is a very old FTBFS bug (28 Aug 2000), which was closed in 23 Aug 2003 and reopened in 3 Sep 2003. After this, Frank Lichtenheld comments: I verified that it builds correctly with an added Build-Depends to debhelper. But

Re: /etc/shells management

2003-09-08 Thread Adam Heath
On Sun, 7 Sep 2003, Guido Guenther wrote: On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 10:23:15AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: if [ -n $var ]; then fi Just of out curiosity, is this in any way different from the shorter: if [ $var ]; then fi var=-f

Bug#209257: debian menu system and capital letters

2003-09-08 Thread Daniel Burrows
Package: menu Severity: normal On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 04:10:20PM +0100, Jason Chambers [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say: On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 02:45:49PM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote: Hi all, A small annoyance I have with debian's menu system is an inconsistency in the naming of

Re: imformation leakage in debian binaries

2003-09-08 Thread Adam Heath
On Sat, 23 Aug 2003, Joey Hess wrote: It's interesting to examine what information about maintainers' build environments slips into binary packages, and consider the possible consequences and what, if anything, we can do about it. Here's an annotated and edited version of the output of the

Re: imformation leakage in debian binaries

2003-09-08 Thread Adam Heath
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Adam Heath wrote: On Sat, 23 Aug 2003, Joey Hess wrote: It's interesting to examine what information about maintainers' build environments slips into binary packages, and consider the possible consequences and what, if anything, we can do about it. Here's an

Re: debian menu system and capital letters

2003-09-08 Thread Jason Chambers
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 05:57:16PM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote: On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 04:10:20PM +0100, Jason Chambers wrote: You can get the case ignored when ordering by adding the following to /etc/menu-methods/menu.h. sort=tolower($title) Then run update-menus to

Re: installer for non-free packages in contrib

2003-09-08 Thread Travis Crump
Colin Watson wrote: ? I think that's a minimal specification for a correct installer package which does its work by creating Debian packages; unless you think that it's better for the installer package to spit out a .deb somewhere which you then have to install separately, which seems to me like a

Re: unrebuildable ruby packages (Re: ruby-defaults 1.8.0)

2003-09-08 Thread Dmitry Borodaenko
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 04:01:31AM +0900, Fumitoshi UKAI wrote: As Marcelo pointed out on Bug#209052, ruby-dev has been obsoleted, so packages that build-depend on ruby-dev can't be built now. We have ruby1.6-dev (for ruby1.6) and ruby1.8-dev (for ruby1.8), so please rebuild your packages to

bitmap vectorizers

2003-09-08 Thread Artur R. Czechowski
[ note: I have no interests in denying any of those packages, there is ] [ a result of digging through wnpp bugs] Hello, There are two packages looking similar: #206859: O: autotrace -- Bitmap to vector graphics converter #208508: ITP: potrace -- utility to

python (parted) question

2003-09-08 Thread Paul Telford
[no response from debian-python, trying my luck here] I've been banging my head against a python problem in a package I'm interested in for quite a while trying to fix a bug. I'm certainly not a python expert, so maybe someone here can help... I have python + python-parted + libparted1.6, all

[ruby] SURVEY: which ruby module packages should support both ruby1.6 and ruby1.8?

2003-09-08 Thread Fumitoshi UKAI
Hi, I'd like to ask you which ruby module packages should support both ruby1.6 and ruby1.8 until ruby1.6 is removed from archive. Some ruby module packages are used for specific ruby applications. In such case, we can safely remove ruby1.6 support from these ruby module packages. However,

Re: [Fwd: False Representation at Google.com]

2003-09-08 Thread Darren Salt
I demand that Branden Robinson may or may not have written... On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 11:02:09AM +1000, Russell Coker wrote: It wan't asking for help, it was asking that we change the way we do things for their minor benefit. Thinking that the world revolves around yourself is a serious

Re: python (parted) question

2003-09-08 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 11:52:35AM -0700, Paul Telford wrote: [no response from debian-python, trying my luck here] [...snip vague problem report...] You probably didn't get a response because you didn't provide any information about 1) the code you are running, or 2) what actually happens

Jemand hat Dir eine Nachricht geschickt! ID Xscaadsvlv

2003-09-08 Thread Gruesse
Hi und Hallo, Ihnen wurde eine Einladung (Kennung Japdwrdq) über unser Online Kontakt System zugesendet! Um Ihre Einladung anzunehmen, klicken Sie auf folgende Webseite: Webseite: http://www.topfreespace.com/KontaktBox/ Viel Spass Erfolg Service Team Online Kontakt Systeme HINWEISE: Sie

Re: Bug 70132 (on atari-fdisk)

2003-09-08 Thread Wouter Verhelst
Op ma 08-09-2003, om 19:46 schreef Steve Langasek: It seems clear that the package has already been orphaned; filing a bug against wnpp for it is merely a formality. ISTR that Roman is not actively involved in m68k development anymore, so it wouldn't surprise me that he's not taking an

Re: /etc/shells management

2003-09-08 Thread Andreas Metzler
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 08 Sep 2003 11:11:34 +0200, Andreas Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] The fact that a non-version-number string literal with shell redirection operators in it was a valid value of old-version,

Re: imformation leakage in debian binaries

2003-09-08 Thread Adam Heath
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Adam Heath wrote: Ok. I have it fixed. bash-2.05b$ strings build/src/lib/tests/hashtable-test |grep hashtable-test.c ../../../src/lib/tests/hashtable-test.c I might be able to fix it even better, by overriding __FILE__ myself(with -D) on the cmdline, instead of letting

Re: python (parted) question

2003-09-08 Thread Paul Telford
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Matt Zimmerman wrote: You probably didn't get a response because you didn't provide any information about 1) the code you are running, or 2) what actually happens when you run it (no, it returns an error is not sufficient). Fair enough. I should have been more

Re: Bug#209116: exim daemon does not restart after last two security upgrades

2003-09-08 Thread Mark Baker
Zygo Blaxell wrote: I have exim configured in daemon mode and I use xinetd instead of inetd. The last two security updates left me with no running exim daemon and nothing listening in port 25. The latest one was nice enough to create an /etc/inetd.conf that was empty except for this line: smtp

Re: python (parted) question

2003-09-08 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 01:15:03PM -0700, Paul Telford wrote: On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Matt Zimmerman wrote: You probably didn't get a response because you didn't provide any information about 1) the code you are running, or 2) what actually happens when you run it (no, it returns an error is

Re: Mcrypt maintainer.

2003-09-08 Thread Francesco Paolo Lovergine
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 03:53:58PM -0500, Andrés Roldán wrote: Is the mcrypt maintainer MIA? The last mcrypt package was released the last year (November) and there are newer mcrypt and libmcrypt upstream releases. Ask [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Francesco P. Lovergine

Re: Bug#209116: exim daemon does not restart after last two security upgrades

2003-09-08 Thread Ray Miller
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 09:04:29PM +0100, Mark Baker wrote: The startup script for the daemon only runs it if it isn't running from inetd, in order that you don't get both trying to run. I suppose I could check that inetd is running, though that would only work if exim starts before inetd

music sheet

2003-09-08 Thread Brown, Darryl JU0
Do you have the sheet music for dueling banjos? I would like to get it if possible. db

Re: Bug#209116: exim daemon does not restart after last two security upgrades

2003-09-08 Thread Andreas Metzler
Ray Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 09:04:29PM +0100, Mark Baker wrote: The startup script for the daemon only runs it if it isn't running from inetd, in order that you don't get both trying to run. I suppose I could check that inetd is running, though that would

Re: music sheet

2003-09-08 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 03:50:25PM -0600, Brown, Darryl JU0 wrote: Do you have the sheet music for dueling banjos? I would like to get it if possible. If you spelt it differently - Duelling Banjos - you'd get some nice hits at Google for Duelling Banjos sheet music. - Matt

bug report #208857 disappeard ?

2003-09-08 Thread Christophe Barbe
I don't understand why but I am unable to find a bug report I filled 3 days ago. Can someone explain me what happen? http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=208857 See below the ack from bugs.debian.org. I even submitted more info (a full trace that took me a long time to get).

Re: music sheet

2003-09-08 Thread Jim Penny
On Tue, 9 Sep 2003 08:14:59 +1000 Matthew Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do you have the sheet music for dueling banjos? I would like to get it if possible. If you spelt it differently - Duelling Banjos - you'd get some nice hits at Google for Duelling Banjos sheet music. - Matt The

Re: unrebuildable ruby packages (Re: ruby-defaults 1.8.0)

2003-09-08 Thread Joey Hess
Fumitoshi UKAI wrote: I just look into mooix source. The released source that is. RUBY_LINK=`ruby -rrbconfig -e 'puts Config::CONFIG[LIBRUBYARG_SHARED]n'` [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ruby -rrbconfig -e 'puts Config::CONFIG[LIBRUBYARG_SHARED]' nil [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ruby -v

Re: music sheet

2003-09-08 Thread Josip Rodin
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 06:55:31PM -0400, Jim Penny wrote: Do you have the sheet music for dueling banjos? I would like to get it if possible. If you spelt it differently - Duelling Banjos - you'd get some nice hits at Google for Duelling Banjos sheet music. The problem, amazingly

Re: bug report #208857 disappeard ?

2003-09-08 Thread Josip Rodin
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 06:26:27PM -0400, Christophe Barbe wrote: I don't understand why but I am unable to find a bug report I filled 3 days ago. Can someone explain me what happen? http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=208857 ~~~ ~~~

Re: music sheet

2003-09-08 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 06:55:31PM -0400, Jim Penny wrote: On Tue, 9 Sep 2003 08:14:59 +1000 Matthew Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do you have the sheet music for dueling banjos? I would like to get it if possible. If you spelt it differently - Duelling Banjos - you'd get some

Re: music sheet

2003-09-08 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 01:00:11AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 06:55:31PM -0400, Jim Penny wrote: Do you have the sheet music for dueling banjos? I would like to get it if possible. If you spelt it differently - Duelling Banjos - you'd get some nice hits

Re: /etc/shells management

2003-09-08 Thread Colin Watson
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 12:59:24PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote: On Sun, 7 Sep 2003, Guido Guenther wrote: On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 10:23:15AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: if [ -n $var ]; then fi Just of out curiosity, is this in any way different from the shorter: if [ $var ]; then

Re: bug report #208857 disappeard ?

2003-09-08 Thread Colin Watson
On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 01:01:11AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 06:26:27PM -0400, Christophe Barbe wrote: I don't understand why but I am unable to find a bug report I filled 3 days ago. Can someone explain me what happen?

Re: IMPORTANT: your message to html-tidy

2003-09-08 Thread Karsten M. Self
on Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 03:40:15PM +1000, Matthew Palmer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 06:04:39AM +0100, Karsten M. Self wrote: on Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 01:57:54PM +1000, Matthew Palmer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: [W3C's autoresponder] This one's a bit different.

Re: music sheet

2003-09-08 Thread Craig Sanders
On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 09:11:09AM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote: On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 01:00:11AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 06:55:31PM -0400, Jim Penny wrote: Do you have the sheet music for dueling banjos? I would like to get it if possible. If you

autoconf and setting prefix

2003-09-08 Thread David Meggy
Hi, I don't know if this has been asked before or not, but I couldn't find anything using google. I'm trying to build a gcc 3.3.1 cross compiler package for woody, so I use the following line in debian/rules (cd build ../configure --target=arm-linux --enable-target-optspace

Re: autoconf and setting prefix

2003-09-08 Thread James Michael Greenhalgh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On September 08, 2003 20:28, David Meggy wrote: from debian/rules install line (cd build $(MAKE) install prefix=$(CURDIR)/debian/gcc4arm/usr) Hi David, Dunno about 'prefix=' ... I've always used 'DESTDIR='? - -James - -- James Michael

Re: autoconf and setting prefix

2003-09-08 Thread David Meggy
Actually after saying that, I had an epiphany. Why don't I just look at the gcc debian package source. Everyone can ignore that last message David -- David Meggy Engineering Technical Solutions Inc. Unit #1 7157 Honeyman St Delta BC Canada, V4G 1E2

Re: IMPORTANT: your message to html-tidy

2003-09-08 Thread Craig Sanders
On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 11:09:57PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote: On Mon, 8 Sep 2003 15:40:15 +1000 Matthew Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 06:04:39AM +0100, Karsten M. Self wrote: I'm coming to the view that we're approaching the era where all mail is going to have to

Re: bug report #208857 disappeard ?

2003-09-08 Thread christophe barbe
Sorry for this. Let's say it was Monday. Christophe On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 06:26:27PM -0400, Christophe Barbe wrote: I don't understand why but I am unable to find a bug report I filled 3 days ago. Can someone explain me what happen? http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=208857

  1   2   >