[Andrea Mennucc]
me, I do my part of the work in Debian
and nobody ever contacted me regarding the choice of the number
What that...? Why on earth would you think you should be contacted
before this sort of decision is made?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
On Sat, 7 May 2005, Joey Hess wrote:
bb
I did not checked your complete list but our most frequently used
programs at exhigition boothes. It currently has no RC bug (the only
grave bug was solved two weeks ago.
So something is wrong either with your list of with the removal.
Kind regards
On Friday 06 May 2005 11:22am, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
Hi
Note: non-free is NOT provided yet. We need to decide what we do with
it, as we may be forbidden to distribute some of the software in it (we
aren't Debian).
Wait a second, if you *aren't* Debian, it should be *easier* for you to
Ed Cogburn wrote:
Note: non-free is NOT provided yet. We need to decide what we do with
it, as we may be forbidden to distribute some of the software in it (we
aren't Debian).
Wait a second, if you *aren't* Debian, it should be *easier* for you to
provide non-free, not harder.
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 03:26:20AM -0400, Ed Cogburn wrote:
On Friday 06 May 2005 11:22am, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
Hi
Note: non-free is NOT provided yet. We need to decide what we do with
it, as we may be forbidden to distribute some of the software in it (we
aren't Debian).
Wait a
Ed Cogburn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wait a second, if you *aren't* Debian, it should be *easier* for you to
provide non-free, not harder.
Permission to redistribute some bits of non-free may be specific to
Debian. Alternatively, packages may be buildable but no permission to
rebuild them
On 10283 March 1977, Ed Cogburn wrote:
Note: non-free is NOT provided yet. We need to decide what we do with
it, as we may be forbidden to distribute some of the software in it (we
aren't Debian).
Wait a second, if you *aren't* Debian, it should be *easier* for you to
provide non-free,
On 07/05/05, Michael K. Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Again, that's not how it works. In the presence of a valid license
contract, one is entitled to contract-law standards of the
reasonableness of one's attempts to cure a breach when notified. The
automatic termination clause
Joey Hess wrote:
[snip]
doctorj
Seem to just be a SPARC buildd issue holding this out of sarge, as
reported to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] previously.
Can someone with access to a SPARC do a binary-NMU to get this into
sarge, please?
[1]
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: bubnbros
Version : 1.3
Upstream Authors: Armin Rigo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://bub-n-bros.sourceforge.net/
* License : MIT
Description : The Bub's Brothers
This is a new striking n-multiplayer crazy
On 08/05/2005-10:35, Joey Hess wrote:
ocaml-getopt
According to [1], this package was removed because of bug#306074, which
is now fixed. ocaml-getopt in unstable is now 12 days old, so I think it
can be allowed back in testing.
Thanks,
Julien Cristau
[1]
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 08:45:21AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Sat, 7 May 2005, Joey Hess wrote:
bb
I did not checked your complete list but our most frequently used
programs at exhigition boothes. It currently has no RC bug (the only
grave bug was solved two weeks ago.
So something
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 12:36:16PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 08:45:21AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Sat, 7 May 2005, Joey Hess wrote:
bb
I did not checked your complete list but our most frequently used
programs at exhigition boothes. It currently has no RC
Hello
On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 09:03:19PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
...
mnemo2
This package was 10 days old when sarge was frozen. It contain just one
minor bug. I think it can be safely added.
...
Regards,
// Ola
--
- Ola Lundqvist ---
/ [EMAIL
On Saturday 07 May 2005 16.56, Brad and Billie Fick wrote:
do you know how I can get the sheet music to this? If so I would greatly
appreciate it. Thank you
There we go again. I am so glad this happens, helps to lighten the mood
everywhere and certainly eases the way to general happiness in
Hi all,
The following two packages are the only ones not in testing that I
currently use. Note that both are in woody, so it would be good they
also shipped with sarge. (packages maintainers cced, in the hope they
might fix these themselves).
(Note: I'm not a dd, so I can't fix these
Hi Gürkan,
Am Sonntag, 8. Mai 2005 12:01 schrieb Gürkan Sengün:
* Package name: bubnbros
* URL : http://bub-n-bros.sourceforge.net/
* License : MIT
Is it really MIT-licensed? I had a short look at making a package of that
myself, and found the following statement on
* Jaldhar H. Vyas ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050506 20:00]:
On Fri, 6 May 2005, Marc Haber wrote:
Their fault for releasing a book about unreleased software which is
bound to be outdated the day that sarge will actually release.
Uh-uh and when will that day be? And don't give me any of that
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 12:21:05PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On 08/05/2005-10:35, Joey Hess wrote:
ocaml-getopt
According to [1], this package was removed because of bug#306074, which
is now fixed. ocaml-getopt in unstable is now 12 days old, so I think it
can be allowed back in
Hi everybody!
Although I guess there's no chance for it to make it in,
Openswan is the one on my personal wishlist.
Yes, the package is still buggy but AFAIK the bugs are eighter on the
kernel-patches (I don't use KLIPS in favor of the in-kernel ipsec layer,
and since they seem to be a real
On Sat, 2005-05-07 at 15:01 -0400, Bruno Barrera C. wrote:
So, I recently sent an email to the bbconf upstream to know if they're
going to keep working on it. Therefore, I think that we should wait a
bit to know his answers and then I will reply.
Quoting Upstream:
Hm. Well, I agree, it's
[Joey Hess]
So here is a list (from update-excuses) of all 491 packages that is
being held out of sarge[1].
I would be even more interested in seeing which packages in woody are
now missing in sarge. Anyone have such a list available?
It would be nice to have some working upgrade path for
On Sunday 08 May 2005 05:02, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
On 10283 March 1977, Ed Cogburn wrote:
Note: non-free is NOT provided yet. We need to decide what we do with
it, as we may be forbidden to distribute some of the software in it (we
aren't Debian).
Wait a second, if you *aren't* Debian,
On 10283 March 1977, Ed Tomlinson wrote:
Whats going on == someone needs to check it. Thats it.
That was the point made by Ed Cogburn. Its already been checked in the other
arch! If this is not the case please explain why. Without that explanation
I am
forced to agree with Ed - the
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 03:07:44PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Joey Hess]
So here is a list (from update-excuses) of all 491 packages that is
being held out of sarge[1].
I would be even more interested in seeing which packages in woody are
now missing in sarge. Anyone have such a
On 4 May 2005, at 6:39 pm, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 04:35:25PM +0100, Tim Cutts wrote:
On 1 May 2005, at 8:53 am, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
True. However, it does no harm to add the conflicts, while it does
make
it easier for your users. When presented with a bug in another
At the bottom is a complete list of the 2070 binary packages present in
woody but not in sarge (including nun-US and contrib/non-free).
Correction: 2069 binary packages
The entry packages: was a bug in my quickdirty scripting...
cu
Adrian
--
Is there not promise of rain? Ling Tan
Ed Cogburn writes:
Wait a second, if you *aren't* Debian, it should be *easier* for you to
provide non-free, not harder. The only problem with non-free is the
internal politics of Debian. Ubuntu certainly doesn't have any problem
providing access to, but not support for, non-free.
One of
On 10283 March 1977, Ed Tomlinson wrote:
Whats going on == someone needs to check it. Thats it.
That was the point made by Ed Cogburn. Its already been checked in the
other
arch! If this is not the case please explain why. Without that
explanation I am
forced to agree with Ed -
On Sunday 08 May 2005 09:27, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
On 10283 March 1977, Ed Tomlinson wrote:
Whats going on == someone needs to check it. Thats it.
That was the point made by Ed Cogburn. Its already been checked in the
other
arch! If this is not the case please explain why. Without
Ola Lundqvist wrote:
On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 09:03:19PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
...
mnemo2
This package was 10 days old when sarge was frozen. It contain just one
minor bug. I think it can be safely added.
Sorry, I don't think it's a net win to accept packages that were NEW
just before the
Andrew Vaughan wrote:
partimage
Bug: #294953 partimage - refuses to restore image on i386 which is
created on s390.
Synopsis: partimage seems to be i386 only, yet is still built for other
arches. The changelog for 0.6.4-10 says:
partimage (0.6.4-10) unstable; urgency=low
* Change
Hi Malte,
Is it really MIT-licensed? I had a short look at making a package of that
myself, and found the following statement on their homepage
(http://bub-n-bros.sourceforge.net/authors.html):
Yes I have seen that as well.
Almost all sprite images, sounds, background musics and levels are
Hamish Moffatt wrote:
On Friday 06 May 2005 11:22am, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
Hi
Note: non-free is NOT provided yet. We need to decide what we do with
it, as we may be forbidden to distribute some of the software in it (we
aren't Debian).
Not necessary. For 'sattrack' for example, I got
Hi,
One of my packages (ncmpc) is kept out of testing because of a missing
build for sparc (it is unblocked). Looking at the buildd log for sparc
[1], the package seems to have built successfully on April 25th 2005.
Unfortunately, there has been no upload until now. I have contacted
[EMAIL
René van Bevern wrote:
One of my packages (ncmpc) is kept out of testing because of a missing
build for sparc (it is unblocked). Looking at the buildd log for sparc
[1], the package seems to have built successfully on April 25th 2005.
Unfortunately, there has been no upload until now. I have
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you write:
Ren=E9 van Bevern wrote:
One of my packages (ncmpc) is kept out of testing because of a missing
build for sparc (it is unblocked). Looking at the buildd log for sparc
[1], the package seems to have built successfully on April 25th 2005.
Unfortunately,
On Sun, 8 May 2005, Steve Langasek wrote:
Yes, it's called garbage in, garbage out. If people aren't going to file
bugs at the proper severity, and if package maintainers aren't going to
treat release-critical bugs with the appropriate urgency when they *are*
filed at the wrong severity, there's
Unless the theatre can ennoble you, make you a better person, you should flee
from it.
Looking for popular sfotware, but tight on budget?
We are selilng world bestseslers at the chaepest prcices around!
Why so csheap? We don't sel'll progrmas in a fancy box, with printed
documentation, etc.,
Roger Leigh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
FWIW, I've noticed that 3.1 is already used in quite a lot of
documentation and on websites with articles relating to Debian. It
was announced quite some time ago, and so it would be rather
inconsiderate [gross understatement] to change it at this late
Andreas Tille [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, 8 May 2005, Steve Langasek wrote:
Yes, it's called garbage in, garbage out. If people aren't going to file
bugs at the proper severity, and if package maintainers aren't going to
treat release-critical bugs with the appropriate urgency when
John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ed Cogburn writes:
Wait a second, if you *aren't* Debian, it should be *easier* for you to
provide non-free, not harder. The only problem with non-free is the
internal politics of Debian. Ubuntu certainly doesn't have any problem
providing access to,
On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 10:02:51AM +0200, Petr Cech wrote:
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 10:38:39PM +0200 , Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 11:23:51PM +0300, Lior Kaplan wrote:
The NMU is very simple... I don't have a problem with doing it myself in
a week or two.
Adam M. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hamish Moffatt wrote:
On Friday 06 May 2005 11:22am, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
Hi
Note: non-free is NOT provided yet. We need to decide what we do with
it, as we may be forbidden to distribute some of the software in it (we
aren't Debian).
Not necessary.
Ed Tomlinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sunday 08 May 2005 09:27, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
On 10283 March 1977, Ed Tomlinson wrote:
Whats going on == someone needs to check it. Thats it.
That was the point made by Ed Cogburn. Its already been checked in the
other
arch! If this is not
On Sun, 8 May 2005, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
I agree completely here that all bugs should be fixed and the fact that
a bug should be RC but is not marked as such qualifies also for removal
If a bug is RC but not marked such then mark it. Then it is RC and
marked such and any discussion about
hoi :)
On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 09:42:39PM -0600, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
I think the package is ready for a wider audience. I just updated it
to the just-released upstream version 0.9, it's available here:
why do you patch the Makefile?
does 'make prefix=/usr' not work?
--
Martin Waitz
On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 03:01:16PM -0400, Bruno Barrera C. wrote:
On Tue, 2005-05-03 at 14:54 +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
I intend to ask for removal of the following packages in the next few
days unless someone is willing to step up as maintainer. All of these
packages have been
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Adam M. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We are not part of Debian. We are not allowed to use certain Debian
resources such as buildd.d.o for buildd logs, access to the incoming
queue for buildds or wanna-build and several other things.
So if Debian itself does not think
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 03:09:27PM -0700, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
Allow me to explain a bit about the purpose of this application.
This portion of the Launchpad application, when it is completed, will
provide a composite index of all of the packages available in Ubuntu and in
Debian, and link
On Fri, 2005-04-29 at 22:54 -0700, Dillinger wrote:
What do you guys think?
Go ahead. When you have something to show, I'd bet many people would be
more interested.
Benefit of doubt.
--
David Moreno Garza [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.damog.net/
I think there is a world market for maybe five
On Fri, 2005-05-06 at 13:11 +0300, Lior Kaplan wrote:
Any chance you'll at least fix the rc bug so phpdoc will enter sarge?
It's a very small fix to the build-dep line.
What about NMUing? Sorry if this was solved before, I'm replying offline
and have not Internet access since a few days ago.
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 12:35:21AM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
While this sounds like a very useful tool, AFAIK it is a proprietary
service (for now?), and I wonder whether this clashes with part two of
our social contract, at least with the spirit of it (as Debian obviously
did not write
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Chris Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: r-cran-bayesm
Version : 0.0-2
Upstream Authors: Peter Rossi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rob McCulloch [EMAIL PROTECTED].
* URL:
On Mon, 2005-05-09 at 00:24 +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
Your latest comment in #259581 is completely different from this --
please keep the relevant wnpp bug in the loop for stuff like this!
Specifically, your latest recorded comment about bbconf is No, I will
not take care about
Martin Waitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
] On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 09:42:39PM -0600, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
] I think the package is ready for a wider audience. I just updated it
] to the just-released upstream version 0.9, it's available here:
]
] why do you patch the Makefile?
] does 'make
Get it here:
http://highlab.com/~seb/debian
Before 0.10, the upstream installed both the binaries (actually shell
scripts) and the shell libraries in /usr/bin. Starting with 0.10, the
shell libraries are moved to /usr/lib/cogito. This seems to me like a
fine thing to do, any reason Debian
It seems that Red Hat has a lot of programs under /usr/libexec that are
under /usr/lib in Debian. One example is /usr/lib/postfix
vs /usr/libexec/postfix.
It seems to me that /usr/libexec is a better name for such things, and having
the same directory names used across distributions provides
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 8 May 2005 03:04:46 +
Source: snownews
Binary: snownews
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.5.6.1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Joe Nahmias [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Joe Nahmias [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 7 May 2005 11:08:38 -0400
Source: approx
Binary: approx
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 1.15
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Eric Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Eric Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2005 09:23:03 +0200
Source: neon
Binary: libneon24-dev libneon24
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.24.7.dfsg-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 7 May 2005 22:03:48 +
Source: monotone
Binary: monotone
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.19-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Tomas Fasth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 08 May 2005 10:21:39 +0200
Source: gnurobbo
Binary: gnurobbo
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.57.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Lukasz Jachowicz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Lukasz Jachowicz [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 8 May 2005 10:32:51 +0200
Source: seahorse
Binary: seahorse
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.7.8-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Jose Carlos Garcia
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 8 May 2005 11:38:34 +0100
Source: asterisk-spandsp-plugins
Binary: asterisk-app-fax asterisk-app-dtmftotext
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.0.20050203-2.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian VoIP Team
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 08 May 2005 22:18:44 +1000
Source: ssmtp
Binary: ssmtp
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.61-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Anibal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Anibal Monsalve Salazar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 8 May 2005 20:35:51 +0900
Source: ruby1.8
Binary: libtcltk-ruby1.8 libruby1.8-dbg rdoc1.8 libgdbm-ruby1.8 ruby1.8-dev
ruby1.8-elisp ruby1.8-examples libdbm-ruby1.8 irb1.8 ruby1.8
libreadline-ruby1.8 libopenssl-ruby1.8
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 01:24:08 -0400
Source: kismet
Binary: kismet
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2005.04.R1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Francois Gurin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Francois Gurin [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 8 May 2005 16:31:24 +0200
Source: gsnes9x
Binary: gsnes9x
Architecture: source i386
Version: 3.12-7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Alain Schroeder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Alain Schroeder [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 8 May 2005 14:36:13 +0200
Source: mpqc
Binary: mpqc-support mpqc libsc6 libsc-dev libsc-doc
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 2.2.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Michael Banck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 3 May 2005 21:55:42 +0100
Source: mrxvt
Binary: mrxvt mrxvt-common mrxvt-mini mrxvt-cjk
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 0.4.1-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Qingning Huo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 8 May 2005 15:36:04 +0100
Source: libapache2-mod-perl2
Binary: libapache2-mod-perl2 libapache2-mod-perl2-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.999.23-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Thom May [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 8 May 2005 08:12:20 -0700
Source: nagios-plugins
Binary: nagios-plugins
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.4-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Guido Trotter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Guido Trotter [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 8 May 2005 16:56:18 +0200
Source: mailscanner
Binary: mailscanner
Architecture: source all
Version: 4.41.3-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Matthias Klose [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 8 May 2005 18:09:00 +0200
Source: pysvn
Binary: python2.4-svn python2.3-svn python-svn
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 1.1.2-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 8 May 2005 18:01:47 +0200
Source: doc++
Binary: doc++
Architecture: source i386
Version: 3.4.10-3.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Matej Vela [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 8 May 2005 11:02:36 +0200
Source: gcc-snapshot
Binary: gcc-snapshot
Architecture: source ia64
Version: 20050508-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian GCC maintainers debian-gcc@lists.debian.org
Changed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 8 May 2005 10:02:40 +0200
Source: rhythmbox
Binary: rhythmbox
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.8.8-12
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Loic Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Loic Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 (shared library subset
kit)
protoize - Create/remove ANSI prototypes from C code
treelang-4.0 - The GNU Treelang compiler
Closes: 307762 308002
Changes:
gcc-4.0 (4.0.0-6) experimental; urgency=low
.
* Update to CVS 20050508, taken from the gcc-4_0-branch.
.
gcc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 8 May 2005 13:02:22 -0400
Source: debhelper
Binary: debhelper
Architecture: source all
Version: 4.2.36
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 7 May 2005 15:19:11 +0100
Source: libid3tag
Binary: libid3tag0-dev libid3tag0
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.15.1b-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Mad Maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Sam Clegg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 8 May 2005 16:47:55 +0200
Source: galculator
Binary: galculator
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.2.5-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Sebastien Bacher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Sebastien Bacher [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 8 May 2005 18:59:49 +0100
Source: libmad
Binary: libmad0 libmad0-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.15.1b-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Mad Maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Sam Clegg [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 22:14:59 +0100
Source: madplay
Binary: madplay
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.15.2b-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Mad Maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Sam Clegg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 8 May 2005 16:01:37 +0200
Source: roxen3
Binary: roxen3-doc roxen3
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 3.3.63-8
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Turbo Fredriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Turbo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 8 May 2005 20:32:39 +0200
Source: kronolith
Binary: kronolith
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.1.4-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ola Lundqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Ola Lundqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 8 May 2005 14:32:20 +0200
Source: shadow
Binary: login passwd
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1:4.0.3-33
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Shadow package maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Christian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 8 May 2005 20:36:52 +0200
Source: eyed3
Binary: eyed3 python-eyed3
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.6.5-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Alexander Wirt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Alexander Wirt [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 8 May 2005 19:44:59 +0100
Source: request-tracker3.4
Binary: request-tracker3.4 rt3.4-clients
Architecture: source all
Version: 3.4.2-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Stephen Quinney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 8 May 2005 19:30:17 +0100
Source: request-tracker3
Binary: rt3-clients request-tracker3
Architecture: source all
Version: 3.0.12-8
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Stephen Quinney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2005 22:20:50 -0600
Source: scim-chinese
Binary: scim-chinese
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.4.2-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ming Hua [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Ming Hua [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 3 May 2005 22:17:49 +0200
Source: muddleftpd
Binary: muddleftpd
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.3.13.1-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 8 May 2005 21:51:08 +0200
Source: gsnes9x
Binary: gsnes9x
Architecture: source i386
Version: 3.12-8
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Alain Schroeder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Alain Schroeder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 6 May 2005 22:56:55 +0200
Source: gcc-3.3
Binary: gcc-3.3-nof gcc-3.3 libobjc1 libgcc1 lib64g2c0 libstdc++5-3.3-doc
libgcj4 gpc-2.1-3.3-doc libstdc++5 cpp-3.3-doc protoize gcc-3.3-hppa64 cpp-3.3
libgcj4-awt libstdc++5-3.3-dbg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 5 May 2005 18:56:00 +0200
Source: phpsysinfo
Binary: phpsysinfo
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.3-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Frederik Schüler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Frederik Schüler [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 7 May 2005 15:28:51 +0200
Source: hurd
Binary: hurd-dbg hurd-doc hurd-dev hurd
Architecture: all hurd-i386 source
Version: 20050507-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: GNU Hurd Maintainers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 7 May 2005 20:57:12 -0700
Source: openafs
Binary: openafs-client libopenafs-dev openafs-dbserver openafs-modules-source
openafs-fileserver openafs-kpasswd libpam-openafs-kaserver
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 1.3.81-5
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 8 May 2005 22:59:33 +0200
Source: ekg
Binary: ekg libgadu3 libgadu-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1:1.5+20050411-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Marcin Owsiany [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Marcin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 8 May 2005 23:13:06 +0200
Source: abs-guide
Binary: abs-guide
Architecture: source all
Version: 3.4-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Matthias Klose [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 8 May 2005 18:44:44 -0300
Source: gconf2
Binary: libgconf2-4 gconf2 libgconf2-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.8.1-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Takuo KITAME [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Gustavo
1 - 100 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
