Re: [Declude.JunkMail] No one at Declude?

2013-04-17 Thread SM Admin
Apparently I was too quick on the draw as this line has since been added to the diag file: 04/16/2013 22:24:21.947[BB86F9-606322-C04138-958B5A-AB7343-94F75B] IS INVALID KEY Did someone say something about new keys? -Original Message- From: SM Admin Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2013

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] No one at Declude?

2013-04-17 Thread Stephan Chayer
Use this key: CODE 28607230-BF21-4CDE-A59B-A451CC7C9CA0 -Message d'origine- De : SM Admin [mailto:imailad...@bcwebhost.net] Envoyé : 17 avril, 2013 2:43 À : Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Objet : Re: [Declude.JunkMail] No one at Declude? Apparently I was too quick on the draw as this

[Declude.JunkMail] Sample global.cfg ?

2013-04-17 Thread Dave Beckstrom
Is there a current sample global.cfg available? I haven't looked through mine in awhile and I may have some outdated RBLs, etc. Would like to see the current sample just to get an idea of what may have changed. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe,

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] No one at Declude?

2013-04-17 Thread John Doyle
Todd It appears that there is no one at Declude The server that handles this apparently is down and has been for a week or so. Go to mail list archive using the link below Go to the spam version of declude and sort the messages by date Go back a week or so and read the threads There is some

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] No one at Declude?

2013-04-17 Thread Todd Richards
Hi John - Thanks - I actually talked with Linda on Monday afternoon and she got me set back up with a working installation of Declude. What about you? Todd __ Todd Richards Director of Technology National Network, LLC. Email: to...@nnepa.com Toll

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] No one at Declude?

2013-04-17 Thread David Barker
Just my 2c - users do not need to abandon the Declude product. Declude still has tremendous value, hijack, routing email, rules etc all you need is a way to keep Declude running and support which MBF can help you do. The solution to this tragedy is Declude+Message Sniffer. David Barker

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] No one at Declude?

2013-04-17 Thread Nick Hayer
Thanks David for the vote of confidence. Who do we contact at Declude for customer support? They seem to be radio silent for now - at least on this list. Thank you -Nick MadRiverAccess.com|Skywaves.net Tech Support US/Canada 877-873-6482 or International +1-802-229-6574 Emergency Support

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] No one at Declude?

2013-04-17 Thread David Barker
There is no-one at Declude, not one person involved in operations. No engineers, no sales people, no support people no management nothing. The company right now simply exists as an entity. The only help you are going to get from MBF. David From: Nick Hayer

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] No one at Declude?

2013-04-17 Thread Todd
Ours went down as well this morning. Declude stopped processing with a licensing error. I have left several phone messages. Todd From: Nick Hayer n...@madriveraccess.com Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2013 10:47 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] No one at Declude?

2013-04-17 Thread Nick Hayer
Well the only thing that has not gone away is this list for some reason. Even the site went dark for awhile. Why have the the site up, phones on, list work but kill the license server?David - do you have any insight? Thank you -Nick MadRiverAccess.com|Skywaves.net Tech Support US/Canada

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] No one at Declude?

2013-04-17 Thread Darin Cox
There are a lot of new spam nets that have just been turned up over the past few days. Volumes more than doubled for us, with a lot slipping through. We’ve added quite a few class Cs to our firewall blocks this week as we see new ones light up that are entirely owned by a spammer. That’s helped

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] No one at Declude?

2013-04-17 Thread Darin Cox
We run an older Declude perpetual license, so we weren’t affected by this issue, and don’t use Postini, so it’s just the new spam nets over the past week or so that have affected us. Darin. From: Katie La Salle-Lowery Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2013 12:56 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] No one at Declude?

2013-04-17 Thread Pete McNeil
On 2013-04-17 13:06, Katie La Salle-Lowery wrote: X-MessageSniffer-Rules:     20-0-0--1-f Message Sniffer tagged this message with a truncate result. Result code 20. Normally we recommend that a Truncate result

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] No one at Declude?

2013-04-17 Thread David Barker
In short. That is the reason. From: Nick Hayer [mailto:n...@madriveraccess.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2013 12:23 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] No one at Declude? There is no-one at Declude, not one person involved in operations. No engineers, no

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] No one at Declude?

2013-04-17 Thread David Barker
I do know. Let me put it this way, it is up not for the benefit of customers. From: Nick Hayer [mailto:n...@madriveraccess.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2013 12:43 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] No one at Declude? Well the only thing that has not gone

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] No one at Declude?

2013-04-17 Thread David Barker
1. Makes sure that SNF is OFF in the \Diags.txt 2. These are my suggested values (please note that you path if copy/paste) also NONZERO weight can be 20 or 25. Also if you want to break out the NONZERO codes that is fine too. SNIFFER external

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] No one at Declude?

2013-04-17 Thread Pete McNeil
On 2013-04-17 13:36, David Barker wrote: SNIFFER   external NONZERO   "C:\Smartermail\Declude\SNF\SNFClient.exe"     20  0 SNIFFER-CAUTION 

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] No one at Declude?

2013-04-17 Thread Pete McNeil
On 2013-04-17 13:43, Katie La Salle-Lowery wrote: Just to be clear – 020 should be the truncate and 040 the caution (opposite of below) according to what Pete sent (http://www.armresearch.com/support/articles/software/snfServer/core.jsp), right?

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] No one at Declude?

2013-04-17 Thread SM Admin
For IMail that was true, but I switched to SM last fall and that no longer appears to be the case. There is no license code in my declude.cfg file and the cod line says SmarterMail can removed this line. Ben -Original Message- From: Randy Armbrecht Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2013 10:43

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] No one at Declude?

2013-04-17 Thread SM Admin
Why the negative weight on Caution? What’s the logic behind that? Thanks, Ben From: Pete McNeil Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2013 10:47 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] No one at Declude? On 2013-04-17 13:36, David Barker wrote: SNIFFER

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] No one at Declude?

2013-04-17 Thread Pete McNeil
On 2013-04-17 13:52, SM Admin wrote: Why the negative weight on Caution? What’s the logic behind that? The Caution result is based on a special case with a small amount of information: Sniffer is saying: This IP is new, and the first message or two that it sent was spam. The current message

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] No one at Declude?

2013-04-17 Thread David Barker
Sorry for the confusion: This is the correct VERSION. Please update your Sniffer Configs. (Sorry I missed this lack of sleep trying to keep everyone afloat) I am going to post this same information to the MBF Message List. SNIFFER external NONZERO

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] No one at Declude?

2013-04-17 Thread Darin Cox
FYI... I spot-checked some of the domains involved in what we were seeing. Many were two or three years old, so the new domain test would not work on them. On the report, there are log parsers that will do that for you, including Grep and Sawmill. We don’t use those, but import our logs into SQL

[Declude.JunkMail] ***DECLUDE NO-AUTHENTICATION KEY***

2013-04-17 Thread Matt
It seems clear at this point that the failure of Declude's licensing system is causing widespread havoc for their customers, and they are not responding to support issues, or any issues at all, and that they are in fact out of business. Therefore I am going to share the key that allows Declude to

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] No one at Declude?

2013-04-17 Thread Dave Beckstrom
Hi Darin, I don't have stats but in manual checks it seems to be about 50% of my spam. stepvalve.net Creation date: 16 Apr 2013 16:13:00 Expiration date: 16 Apr 2014 08:13:00 kunstkennis.com Updated Date: 17-apr-2013 Creation Date: 16-apr-2013 shoputc.com Creation date: 16 Apr 2013 19:24:13

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] ***DECLUDE NO-AUTHENTICATION KEY***

2013-04-17 Thread SM Admin
So what needs to be done with ClamAV? -Original Message- From: Matt Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2013 11:24 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] ***DECLUDE NO-AUTHENTICATION KEY*** It seems clear at this point that the failure of Declude's licensing system is

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] No one at Declude? topic change - gbudb

2013-04-17 Thread Nick Hayer
Pete, Is the data in truncate.gbudb.net duplicated in Sniffer? Thank you -Nick MadRiverAccess.com|Skywaves.net Tech Support US/Canada 877-873-6482 or International +1-802-229-6574 Emergency Support 24/7: supp...@skywaves.net General and Non-Emergency support ticket:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] ***DECLUDE NO-AUTHENTICATION KEY***

2013-04-17 Thread John Doyle
Matt I've been told if you have sniffer running and you block SNF RETURN CODE 049 AND 055 you block most virus's. I ended up putting different weights for the return codes years ago. I score them high enough to delete on weight only and as well delete on the names Here is my setup from global

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] No one at Declude? topic change - gbudb

2013-04-17 Thread Pete McNeil
On 2013-04-17 15:20, Nick Hayer wrote: Is the data in truncate.gbudb.net duplicated in Sniffer? No. Each SNF node has it's own view of the world. The truncate bl has an aggregate view from all SNF nodes. That means that it's good to use truncate

[Declude.JunkMail] ClamAV with Declude

2013-04-17 Thread Matt
I'm going to share some old information from 2009 that I put together for integrating ClamAV. Note that I cannot confirm at this moment whether these directions are perfectly accurate for the most recent code available, so please update this if you find issues. _Please also pay close attention to

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] IS INVALID KEY

2013-04-17 Thread Andy Schmidt
Phew - thanks for posting this. This WAS scary. Within a few minutes I had hundreds of spam emails in my inbox... Stopped the SMTP service and Queue service. This CODE did seem to help! -Original Message- From: Stephan Chayer [mailto:scha...@intrasoft.net] Sent: Wednesday, April 17,

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] No one at Declude?

2013-04-17 Thread Andy Schmidt
Uh - but with that code, the internal SNF is turned off? So one has to configure Sniffer has an external test with a separate Sniffer license code? -Original Message- From: Stephan Chayer [mailto:scha...@intrasoft.net] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2013 5:37 AM To:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] No one at Declude?

2013-04-17 Thread David Barker
Yes Internal Sniffer is no longer a valid option. Need to switch to external. -Original Message- From: Andy Schmidt [mailto:andy_schm...@hm-software.com] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2013 12:06 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] No one at Declude? Uh - but

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] No one at Declude?

2013-04-17 Thread Andy Schmidt
So - is there any advantage of using the hosts file trick (to invalidate the license server IP address) http://mailsbestfriend.com/declude-fix vs. using the special bypass license code? Does one enable more functions that the other? -Original Message- From: David Barker

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] No one at Declude?

2013-04-17 Thread David Barker
If internal SNF is still ON then it can conflict with external Message Sniffer by grabbing the port which SNF uses. By using our fix will ensure internal SNF is turned OFF. If using the bypass key has everything OFF then that is fine too. -Original Message- From: Andy Schmidt

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] No one at Declude?

2013-04-17 Thread Andy Schmidt
Thanks David, So, OTHER than Sniffer, any OTHER advantages of using the HOSTS trick vs. the Bypass key? -Original Message- From: David Barker [mailto:david.bar...@mailsbestfriend.com] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2013 1:09 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail]